• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

News Roe v. Wade overturned

Page 28 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
And yet no stern words for the man responsible for said pregnancy
Party of personal responsibility shirking responsibility?!! Why I never...! 😀

I hope the women in the lives of these religious nuts withhold "relations" claiming they don't want to get pregnant and risk snuffing out potential life.
And the daughters should make their lives absolute hell too....just put em on blast 24/7 for being such dicks.
 
Last edited:
They don't need to crow about it as they have a dozen other talking points to hammer the Dems on and to win. If it's truly a summer decision then the outrage will likely subside a bit by November, no doubt helped by the inept Dems and their continued lack of a messaging game even after SIX YEARS.
And are you including yourself in the inept Dem category?
 
Let's criminalize IVF and miscarriages. Fuck yeah!

Won't be surprised if this fails (surviving a committee isn't the same as passing all votes and becoming law), but still... that's pretty horrifying. It's basically a return to the mid-20th century, when women not only couldn't legally seek abortions in many places but often had few ways to prevent unwanted pregnancies.

And criminalizing miscarriages is downright spiteful — imagine going to prison because you were hurt in a car crash or fell down the stairs.
 
Won't be surprised if this fails (surviving a committee isn't the same as passing all votes and becoming law), but still... that's pretty horrifying. It's basically a return to the mid-20th century, when women not only couldn't legally seek abortions in many places but often had few ways to prevent unwanted pregnancies.

And criminalizing miscarriages is downright spiteful — imagine going to prison because you were hurt in a car crash or fell down the stairs.
Evidently an abortion cost $5-20 in Nebraska in 1897.

MedicalServicesList1897Nebraska.jpg
 
I can see this spiraling out of control ...
We need less control here, that's part of the problem. They want to control us. Get the women to the polls. 70+% favor choice (men and women, among women, likely much more), get them to cast their votes for choice candidates, vote the Republicans out of office and then tackle gerrymandering and voting restrictions that favor Republicans.
 
Last edited:
We need less control here, that's part of the problem. They want to control us. Get the women to the polls. 70+% favor choice, get them to cast their votes for choice candidates, vote the Republicans out of office and then tackle gerrymandering and voting restrictions that favor Republicans.
Clearly the next step is remove women's rights to vote.
 
Won't be surprised if this fails (surviving a committee isn't the same as passing all votes and becoming law), but still... that's pretty horrifying. It's basically a return to the mid-20th century, when women not only couldn't legally seek abortions in many places but often had few ways to prevent unwanted pregnancies.

And criminalizing miscarriages is downright spiteful — imagine going to prison because you were hurt in a car crash or fell down the stairs.
Fact is a great many women have successive miscarriages, can't come to term. Imagine the humiliation and harassment and perhaps horrible experiences with the criminal injustice system that they are apt to suffer, and these are women who sometimes/often desperately want to bare a child.
 
Back
Top