News Roe v. Wade overturned

Page 29 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
P

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
15,142
10,040
136
Truly terrible article (on the leak) by Ross Doubt-that in the NYT. Annoyed I wasted my last 'free article' on his drivel. Now it won't let me read anything else.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Captante and Pohemi
P

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
15,142
10,040
136
pmv said:
Truly terrible article (on the leak) by Ross Doubt-that in the NYT. Annoyed I wasted my last 'free article' on his drivel. Now it won't let me read anything else.
Click to expand...


It was an annoyingly stupid article. Just speculates that the leak 'must' have been from a 'liberal' and then woffles on from there.

See, it 'must' have been a liberal, because it's liberal judges who are 'activists' - ignore Thomas being married to someone who urged the overturning of an election result, that isn't "activism". Nor is mounting a multi-decade effort to specifically take control of the Supreme Court at all costs, in order to achieve your political goals. That's not 'activism' either, apparently. Only liberals can be activists.

He also illustrates the 'politicisation' of the court with a list that puts the Merick Garland gaming of the system on a par with some Dems merely _talking_ about court packing (which is clearly a _response_ to the politicisation, not a cause), and not even mentioning Barrett's rushed confirmation. Really passive-aggressive sneaky bit of spin, there.

And of course he ignores the _content_ of the leak, as if the leak itself is the 'real issue' here. Probably is slightly more likely it was leaked by someone on 'team liberal', but the politics of the leaker is surely a secondary issue? It's not impossible the leak might not have been political at all, either way - just someone in a junior position over-excited at having a bit of extremely-high-news-value inside information.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo and dank69
cytg111

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,189
15,597
136
Luna1968 said:
now the crazy democrats are DOXing the justices. this is not how a democracy works. another summer of batshit crazy liberals burning cities.
Click to expand...
80% of the US population is crazy democrats? Holy smokes, think you gonn need some more tinfoil…
 
dank69

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,356
32,985
136
pmv said:
It was an annoyingly stupid article. Just speculates that the leak 'must' have been from a 'liberal' and then woffles on from there.

See, it 'must' have been a liberal, because it's liberal judges who are 'activists' - ignore Thomas being married to someone who urged the overturning of an election result, that isn't "activism". Nor is mounting a multi-decade effort to specifically take control of the Supreme Court at all costs, in order to achieve your political goals. That's not 'activism' either, apparently. Only liberals can be activists.

He also illustrates the 'politicisation' of the court with a list that puts the Merick Garland gaming of the system on a par with some Dems merely _talking_ about court packing (which is clearly a _response_ to the politicisation, not a cause), and not even mentioning Barrett's rushed confirmation. Really passive-aggressive sneaky bit of spin, there.

And of course he ignores the _content_ of the leak, as if the leak itself is the 'real issue' here. Probably is slightly more likely it was leaked by someone on 'team liberal', but the politics of the leaker is surely a secondary issue? It's not impossible the leak might not have been political at all, either way - just someone in a junior position over-excited at having a bit of extremely-high-news-value inside information.
Click to expand...
Conservatives. Dishonest with themselves. Dishonest with everyone else. Dishonest to their core.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie, Pohemi, hal2kilo and 1 other person
kage69

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
31,349
47,587
136
Luna1968 said:
now the crazy democrats are DOXing the justices. this is not how a democracy works. another summer of batshit crazy liberals burning cities.
Click to expand...

Still projecting like a treasonous moron eh Luna?

A Trump fluffer like you, who cheers on and defends the GQP's various affronts to democracy and the rule of law, is telling others how democracy should work? That is hilarious.

Let's put aside the full blown insurrection for a moment. You assholes have been hounding state, election and school board members over The Big Lie since early 2021, driving them out and even making some of them move their families, sometimes repeatedly. Please, take your low information hypocrisy and insurrection loving dumbass and fuck right the hell off. Newsflash: Democrats aren't the ones stealing court seats, killing judicial precedent, undermining elections, or about to make women 2nd class citizens. They also aren't the ones who paid off Kavanaugh's debts before his shit show sham of a confirmation, why don't you want to follow the money? You get what that makes you right? Probably not. Spewing mindless drivel that sounds edgy when Tucker says it, not being able to comprehend much; just seems to be your standard protocol when you're out to embarrass yourself.


"Liberals burning cities!" Says the fascist supporting moron while her cult is burning, literally and figuratively, books and laws that hurt their poor racist feels... *sigh*

oiCP96P.png


Just playin, that's not Luna. If it were Luna one of those feet would be in her mouth.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: DarthKyrie, soundforbjt, Pohemi and 5 others
zinfamous

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,857
31,346
146
pmv said:
It was an annoyingly stupid article. Just speculates that the leak 'must' have been from a 'liberal' and then woffles on from there.

See, it 'must' have been a liberal, because it's liberal judges who are 'activists' - ignore Thomas being married to someone who urged the overturning of an election result, that isn't "activism". Nor is mounting a multi-decade effort to specifically take control of the Supreme Court at all costs, in order to achieve your political goals. That's not 'activism' either, apparently. Only liberals can be activists.

He also illustrates the 'politicisation' of the court with a list that puts the Merick Garland gaming of the system on a par with some Dems merely _talking_ about court packing (which is clearly a _response_ to the politicisation, not a cause), and not even mentioning Barrett's rushed confirmation. Really passive-aggressive sneaky bit of spin, there.

And of course he ignores the _content_ of the leak, as if the leak itself is the 'real issue' here. Probably is slightly more likely it was leaked by someone on 'team liberal', but the politics of the leaker is surely a secondary issue? It's not impossible the leak might not have been political at all, either way - just someone in a junior position over-excited at having a bit of extremely-high-news-value inside information.
Click to expand...

conservatives aren't at all honest people, in any thing they do in life.

In case you weren't aware.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie, Pohemi and hal2kilo
kage69

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
31,349
47,587
136
cytg111 said:
80% of the US population is crazy democrats? Holy smokes, think you gonn need some more tinfoil…
Click to expand...

She needs professional help. Anyone that clueless and detached from reality, with such contempt for their own kind, has issues.

I'm not sure what kind of mental condition or injury it would take for someone to look at the past several years and feel the Dems were the problem, but I'll bet it's serious.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie, Pohemi and Tsinni Dave
kage69

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
31,349
47,587
136
I wish Luna cared as much for victims of rape and incest as she does regurgitating right wing talking points from Fox and church. The victims already have it bad, making them opt for a van or a friend's bathtub seems mighty christian though I guess. "No exceptions" really seems to be the rage now with red states, I wonder how that got normalized. Any thoughts Luna? Shall we blame that on the Dems too?

I have a theory.

xitceDe.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: DarthKyrie, Leeea, Pohemi and 1 other person
E

eelw

Lifer
Dec 4, 1999
10,335
5,487
136
If that poll is extremely in favour of abortion when rape, why are politicians so gung ho to block it?
 
kage69

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
31,349
47,587
136
eelw said:
If that poll is extremely in favour of abortion when rape, why are politicians so gung ho to block it?
Click to expand...

Because rape is sanctioned by their god and is now financially lucrative in some states. Victims should 'try to enjoy it,' consider it 'an opportunity' though ultimately not worry because 'a woman's body can shut that all down, reject it.' That and there is usually suggestive, devil provoking clothing involved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie, Pohemi and hal2kilo
SMOGZINN

SMOGZINN

Lifer
Jun 17, 2005
14,359
4,640
136
hal2kilo said:
I can't believe how people are underestimating how this will get woman off of their asses to vote. Keep on keeping on.
Click to expand...
Not really going to happen. Texas already tested those waters. There were a few days of protests, but nothing really happened at the polls.

Indus said:
Yep.. and nothing is changing without it.

A true revolution has blood in the streets and the guillotine!
Click to expand...
Guillotine's are so last century. I'm working on a drone with a robotic arm and a chainsaw.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie and nakedfrog
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom