Lost_in_the_HTTP
Lifer
- Nov 17, 2019
- 13,440
- 7,905
- 136
You mean a guy trying to disarm what he perceived to be a potential active shooter, who in fact turned out to be an active shooter?You see self defense. As it is. As it SHOULD be.
You mean a guy trying to disarm what he perceived to be a potential active shooter, who in fact turned out to be an active shooter?You see self defense. As it is. As it SHOULD be.
Exactly how did Rosenbaum attack Kyle ?You see self defense. As it is. As it SHOULD be.
How can you witness an assailant chase down and attack someone and come to any other conclusion?
If you need some context behind Rosenbaum's attack, the trial gave PLENTY of it!!!
Here's what Richard McGinness said he saw.PROSECUTOR: I mean you have no idea what Mr. Rosenbaum was thinking at any point of his life. You have never been inside his head, you never met him before. MCGINNISS: I never exchanged words with him, if that’s what your question is. PROSECUTOR: So your interpretation of what he was trying to do or what he was intending to do or anything along those lines is complete guesswork isn’t it. MCGINNISS: Well he said f--- you and reached for the weapon.Well, there's that. So a convicted child molester with a long and violent criminal history runs up to Kyle Rittenhouse out of nowhere in the middle of a riot and tries to take his gun away. So Rittenhouse shot him. That's what happened. Those are the facts. Again, according to the prosecution’s own witness. And not just one witness.Today, the prosecution's medical expert, a man called Doug Kelly, testified that Joseph Rosenbaum appeared to be grabbing the barrel of Kyle Rittenhouse's rifle when Rittenhouse fired. Then yet another prosecution witness, this one called Ryan Balch, testified that Joseph Rosenbaum said out loud that he intended to kill Kyle Rittenhouse.BALCH: And I stepped in and told everybody, "chill out, calm down, stop doing that." I turned and had an exchange with one of the protestors and I kind of explained to that protester, I get what you’re trying to do but not this. And when I turned around, Rosenbaum was right there in front of my face yelling and screaming. And I said dude, back up chill, I don’t know what your problem is. And he goes you know what, if I catch one of you guys alone tonight I’m going to f---ing kill you."BINGER: And he said that to you?BALCH: Correct.BINGER: Did he say that to the defendant as well? BALCH: Well the defendant was there – so yes.
A guy who threatened to kill Kyle according to the testimony of Balch ran after him and tried to grab his gun.You mean a guy trying to disarm what he perceived to be a potential active shooter, who in fact turned out to be an active shooter?
You mean a guy trying to disarm what he perceived to be a potential active shooter, who in fact turned out to be an active shooter?
If a teen-aged punk from Illinois comes to your town parading around with a long gun pointing it at people, what conclusion would you come to?Ah yes, the street thug department of precognition.
If someone says they are going to kill you, and make an attempt to take your gun from you, what conclusion would come to?
If a teen-aged punk from Illinois comes to your town parading around with a long gun pointing it at people, what conclusion would you come to?
If a teen-aged punk from Illinois comes to your town parading around with a long gun pointing it at people, what conclusion would you come to?
Will this be the first ‘self-defense ‘ case where the defendant was never physically touched, ‘aggressor’ not armed and gets off? Don’t remember any in recent times.
You see self defense. As it is. As it SHOULD be.
How can you witness an assailant chase down and attack someone and come to any other conclusion?
If you need some context behind Rosenbaum's attack, the trial gave PLENTY of it!!!
I've stated that very thing to Jackass and others using the drone footage. It does not show Rosenbaum attacking KR. It shows KR being followed and then KR turns around and shoots RosenbaumExactly how did Rosenbaum attack Kyle ?
Did he hit him?
Did he threaten him with a weapon?
Will this be the first case where there was zero physical contact between the two parties? This decision could create a dangerous precedent.
You'd be wrong. Only if Kyle is found not guilty will there be riots by the leftists that wanted a lynching.Defense rests in Kyle Rittenhouse murder trial; closing arguments set for Monday
Judge Bruce Schroeder dismissed the jury until Monday, when\u00a0closing arguments are expected to be held.www.usatoday.com
We'll find out soon how this case ends up with a verdict. But whatever it is, I predict riots by the those who do not agree with it.![]()
In this country we are all innocent until proven guilty. Therefore to be found not guilty is to be .......innocent.And neither conclusively means the accused did or did not do what they were charged with.
No, Rosenbaum was the aggressor when earlier in the night he made threats to kill KR and other people....... they are on record.KR was the aggressor the minute he aimed the gun at Rosenbaum seconds before KR ran to the spot where he shot Rosenbaum.
This judge reminds more than a little of Judge Hoffman from the trial of the Chicago 7, only this time with an obvious bias toward the defense instead of against it. I'm half-surprised someone on the prosecution hasn't been bound and gagged yet.
A "potential active shooter" ? So you think it's a good idea to try to disarm every armed person whether they are legal or not ? How does that go over with the police officers you try to disarm as "potential active shooters"You mean a guy trying to disarm what he perceived to be a potential active shooter, who in fact turned out to be an active shooter?
A "potential active shooter" ? So you think it's a good idea to try to disarm every armed person whether they are legal or not ? How does that go over with the police officers you try to disarm as "potential active shooters"
Wasn't the whole reason for guns in schools to be able to deal with active shooters? But now you're telling us we shouldn't even try to disarm them?A "potential active shooter" ? So you think it's a good idea to try to disarm every armed person whether they are legal or not ? How does that go over with the police officers you try to disarm as "potential active shooters"
Unless your name is George Floyd or Philando Castile or Tamir Rice, or dozens of others, and then it's comply or be extrajuducially executed on the spot.In this country we are all innocent until proven guilty. Therefore to be found not guilty is to be .......innocent.
Unless your name is George Floyd or Philando Castile or Tamir Rice, or dozens of others, and then it's comply or be extraducially executed on the spot.
A "potential active shooter" ? So you think it's a good idea to try to disarm every armed person whether they are legal or not ? How does that go over with the police officers you try to disarm as "potential active shooters"
So, now you’re saying words can be a reason for a claim of self defense ? A lot of fights I saw in the large niteclub I worked for in the 80’s started with the words “I’m gonna kill you!”. Nobody ever died at that club.No, Rosenbaum was the aggressor when earlier in the night he made threats to kill KR and other people....... they are on record.
Im going to kill you with my fists doesn`t add up to a viable threat of immanent death....duh....A guy who threatened to kill Kyle according to the testimony of Balch ran after him and tried to grab his gun.
words -- Im going to kill you......doesn`t equate a viable defense for self defense!!No, Rosenbaum was the aggressor when earlier in the night he made threats to kill KR and other people....... they are on record.
Imported is a sock account who is programmed by his handlers.....Wasn't the whole reason for guns in schools to be able to deal with active shooters? But now you're telling us we shouldn't even try to disarm them?
