It's merely your opinion that I'm intolerant at all for daring to question islam at all.
I think, if anything, the luvvy-duvvy opinions expressed by you, VG, and others are really just a mask to cover fear. Somewhere, deep down, you know that groups like muslims are likely to go into a frothing rage and become violent for so much as asking the question of whether they're the "religion of peace" as they claim to be.
Since you know that negative reaction is likely, you believe (as they do) that to ask such a question is "rude" "intolerant" "bigoted" "blasphemous" or otherwise "wrong". By choosing that stance, you actually justify the violence that comes after asking an "offensive" question.
"He wouldn't have become violent if the other guy hadn't provoked him with his rude/intolerant/bigoted/blasphemous comment!"
You think this is the only place I get to see this kind of thinking? It's the most common method of thought on the planet!
I'm trying to get below the surface and actually address why that violent action is NOT justified and what could possibly done to address it (besides merely giving in to every demand.)
It's interesting how similar the methodologies of islam and feminism are, as well as the end-goals of totalitarianism. No surprise I object to both, since I don't want to live under the totalitarian state of either.
BTW, good debate linked a few messages up... 25 minutes into it so far. Pity the muslim spokesman decided to change the rules of the debate for himself right from the get-go, but listening to what he has to say. So far, he's only dancing around the subject and not addressing it head-on.