Because Hannity isn’t a law school professor? He’s a Republican and they stick together.Makes me wonder how he's been convinced/bribed to defend this indefensible douchebag.
I expect the House to hold an ethics hearing on Nunes. Heard an interview with Jackie Spier. She was asked since you had the phone records why didn't you put Nunes on the stand? Her response was since he wasn't on the agenda for what they were covering it would have been improper.It is kind of bonkers that one of Trump's likely co-conspirators was allowed to help conduct the impeachment inquiry. There's a non-trivial chance Nunes ends up in prison by the time this is all done, which would be very satisfying.
For this country to fully heal all those shitheads need to goto jail. A loud message need to be sent for all politicians in the future.Haha it sure is! Barr should absolutely be impeached.
Our country is held together by everyone generally agreeing that the system is more important than winning any one political fight. That appears to have broken down though.
I agree, they need to frame the questions so he can’t disagree without looking partisan.They need to ask turley some questions. His answers need to be exposed and countered.
Que Progressive Ins. theme song.I like Professor Karlan, she makes explanations so simple even a trumpet should understand.
This kind of thing should be a key strategy here, point out how Republicans actually no-kidding really do support impeachment as long as you remove the Trump name, then ask why the Trump name should make this president immune to impeachment.Karlan cites Brett Kavanaugh’s legal opinion on why foreigners should not be allowed to contribute to US candidates. Haha
Karlan has been particularly effective here.
Got to get the old really corrupt people back in power. Somebody Trump knows how to deal with.Meanwhile guess who is in Kyiv and what he's doing:
This is weapons grade stupidity.
They need to ask turley some questions. His answers need to be exposed and countered.
I mean, majority counsel pretty much negated Turley’s entire opening statement by asking him a single question:
Counsel: “Did you write that commission of a crime isn’t necessary for an impeachment?”
Turley: “Err, but I qualified that with...”
Counsel: “Yes or no question...did you write [that]?”
Turley: “Yes”
I gotta be honest, I’m not exactly sure why Judiciary is interviewing law scholars and not fact witnesses. We should be going after every witness/principle who refused a subpoena and continue to get the facts out in the open—not worry about whether the public understands this is a constitutional impeachment proceeding. This seems like a waste of time to me.
I'd love love LOVE to see that happen. I'm not sure the Dems have the balls or muscle to go that far though.For this country to fully heal all those shitheads need to go to jail. A loud message need to be sent for all politicians in the future.
I gotta be honest, I’m not exactly sure why Judiciary is interviewing law scholars and not fact witnesses. We should be going after every witness/principle who refused a subpoena and continue to get the facts out in the open—not worry about whether the public understands this is a constitutional impeachment proceeding. This seems like a waste of time to me.
