It is kind of bonkers that one of Trump's likely co-conspirators was allowed to help conduct the impeachment inquiry. There's a non-trivial chance Nunes ends up in prison by the time this is all done, which would be very satisfying.
Barr needs impeachment next.Add this to the insulation from Barr in the criminal referral and attempt to suppress the whistleblower report. I mean, someone actively conspiring with people whose job it is to hold him responsible for such conspiracy is kind of a red flag, no?
Add this to the insulation from Barr in the criminal referral and attempt to suppress the whistleblower report. I mean, someone actively conspiring with people whose job it is to hold him responsible for such conspiracy is kind of a red flag, no?
I hear what you're saying but the only alternative is that Trump was lying about his justification for withholding aid and we both know that can't possibly be true.
He doesn’t seem to command the knowledge and the ins and outs of Parliamental procedures. He knows them but he’s not as quick as Schiff is at countering them. That’s just my first impressions though.
Let’s not forget, he’s the guy that thought it was smart to use a bucket of chicken as a prop.
So far it looks like Turley of all people is going to be defending Trump. Strike you off on the list of people I really used to like.
I don't even know what world Turley is on. Doesn't seem to care about the law at all.
He's basically saying that we need to not impeach Trump specifically because we don't like him.I don't even know what world Turley is on. Doesn't seem to care about the law at all.
Why is it with all things Republicans, their arguments seem so BS. I learned a lot from the first 3, esp. the 1st witness. Turley? I'm not sure what his argument is? In fact, the first witness clearly defined what High crimes and misdemeanor was, yet Turley seems to ignore that historical record.
So far he’s so full of shit I can smell it through the tv. He’s making an emotional appeal against impeachment vs the facts. He cited the impeachment case against Jackson as the most relevant which is bull shit as this impeachment isn’t based on hate at all, no matter how many different ways he tries to say it is.
It was surprisingly pathetic. I guess he came down with Dershowitz disease.yeah but his dog is angry and he doesn't want his dog to be angry. It's a labradoodle! Those dogs don't get angry! This is so unfair!
Turley: I’m not a fan, nor did I vote for him, but I’m here to defend him at any cost.
Turley in 1998: if we allow the president to get away with illegal activity it is corrosive to the country as a whole and encourages future presidents to do the same.
Makes me wonder how he's been convinced/bribed to defend this indefensible douchebag.Turley in 1998: if we allow the president to get away with illegal activity it is corrosive to the country as a whole and encourages future presidents to do the same.
I was actually looking forward for a reasonable argument against impeachment, one based on historical facts or a counter to existing facts and testimony. What we got was what we always get from the right, feelings because reasons.
