[DHT]Osiris
Lifer
- Dec 15, 2015
- 15,360
- 13,682
- 146
I gotta be honest, I’m not exactly sure why Judiciary is interviewing law scholars and not fact witnesses. We should be going after every witness/principle who refused a subpoena and continue to get the facts out in the open—not worry about whether the public understands this is a constitutional impeachment proceeding. This seems like a waste of time to me.
Yeah, basically this. It's a waste of time for us because we already have the correct conclusions (that this shit was illegal and he needs to be impeached). It's for everyone else to understand why you have to impeach for his factual, cite-able behavior.I don’t think you are understanding the process here. An impeachment is a political process. What that means is that it’s not about crimes being committed but it’s also about explaining to the public why it’s being done.
These witnesses are explaining why it’s being done.
