If it was my daughter I'd be furious. But since its a boy, well, I'd let him pimp on.
You know as well as I do that he wants it, if I remember 3/4 of 14 year olds are flat and probably bad in the sack too.
If it was my daughter I'd be furious. But since its a boy, well, I'd let him pimp on.
You know as well as I do that he wants it, if I remember 3/4 of 14 year olds are flat and probably bad in the sack too.
shimsham exactly! Best point ever!
In that day and age they did have all of these STDs as well and now they do. So its more risky today and not good to do today because of the risk. If you carch a STD then spread it then how will you feel or what if someone else gave it to you? Then how would you feel? I would be mad. So by not doing it you don't have that problem ever!
So I say here here to not ever doing it!
Thats so wrong its not even funny.
It should be the same if its your son or daughter. You people are so sick and you wonder why we are in the world we are today. Ha.
Oh please. 14 year old girls do not think about getting laid. Most of them anyway.
To the OP: Would you rather have him shagging other 14 year olds? Clearly he's a stud, and could probably pick some up.
Poor kid could have been a hero at his school.
Good stuff!!!
In this case I guess it was the right thing to do, BUT if I had a 14 yr old son who was seeing a 14 yr old girl, I'd let them be, just educate them about sex. I mean comon, he's going through puberty and the more you try to contain them, the more they'll do things behind your back.
For once I agree with imtim83.
Hero or not, there are just too many possible negative consequences for a person of that age (14) to be banging a 21 yr old woman. STDs and pregnancy are reason enough to prevent it. A responsible parent's job is to raise their child into a responsible adult.
It's attitudes like "he'd be a hero" at school that cause moral collapse.
Hero or not, there are just too many possible negative consequences for a person of that age (14) to be banging a 21 yr old woman. STDs and pregnancy are reason enough to prevent it. A responsible parent's job is to raise their child into a responsible adult.
It's attitudes like "he'd be a hero" at school that cause moral collapse.
Deeko
Lifer
- Jun 16, 2000
- 30,213
- 12
- 81
imtim you fvcking dork, I was just joking around, but good god calm the fvck down. "you wonder why we are in the world we're in today" because someone mentions that 14 year olds can have sex??? Good god you'v got some problems if you think thats whats wrong with society.
I hate to tell everyone this, but STD's have NOTHING to do with age or morality. They're purely a bilogical situation, which are preventable with caution and common sense...which is why STD rates are so low today compared with a couple hundred years ago.
You can have every 13yr old sodomizing or sodomized by every 45 year old married person, and the ONLY ones who'll contract an STD are the ones who have sex with someone who already has one. Age, morality, etc do NOT figure in.
What we're dealing with is 100% a social stigma, nothing else.
I didn't go on a date till I was 16...never kissed a girl or held her hand until then. If I had it to do over again I would have been pimping at 12. No joke. I would have been more responsible than I was at certain times in my life, but I wouldn't have reduced the sex...in fact I'd do my best to triple it.
Well, I'm sorry that I mistook you for a 15 year-old... It's just that is how you carry yourself.Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
I'm 32, have a degree, served in the military during time of war, and have children...I don't think there are many people who could define mature in a way that doesn't cover me.
A 14 year-old doesn't fully understand right from wrong, nor could he understand the possible implications of such actions.
Forbidding your child from taking part in actions that could have severe consequences is hardly "child abuse." Allowing your child to do whatever he/she pleases, is much more akin to that.
But thank you for answering my earlier question about what's wrong with people.
Well like a couple of posters have said, if they're really interested in each other nothing you do except for physically tying your son down for the next 4 years is going to prevent it from happening.
Definitely have 'the talk' with your son and give him a pack of condoms, or ask the father to do it.
Definitely have 'the talk' with your son and give him a pack of condoms, or ask the father to do it.
Originally posted by: Wingznut
Well, I'm sorry that I mistook you for a 15 year-old... It's just that is how you carry yourself.Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
I'm 32, have a degree, served in the military during time of war, and have children...I don't think there are many people who could define mature in a way that doesn't cover me.
A 14 year-old doesn't fully understand right from wrong, nor could he understand the possible implications of such actions.
Forbidding your child from taking part in actions that could have severe consequences is hardly "child abuse." Allowing your child to do whatever he/she pleases, is much more akin to that.
But thank you for answering my earlier question about what's wrong with people.
Ohh please 14 year olds understand more than you think. When i was 14 i was probably more responsible than most people are at 18. Forbidding your child from doing something will just make them want to do it more. You won't be able to shield a kid from life. You have to tell them how to be safe and let them do their thing because if you dont they will just do it secretly.
midwestfisherman
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2003
- 3,564
- 8
- 81
The 21 year old is the one who needs to be dealt with. I say invite her over so you can tell her to stay away, or you'll call the cops.
midwestfisherman
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2003
- 3,564
- 8
- 81
Originally posted by: Wingznut
Well, I'm sorry that I mistook you for a 15 year-old... It's just that is how you carry yourself.Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
I'm 32, have a degree, served in the military during time of war, and have children...I don't think there are many people who could define mature in a way that doesn't cover me.
A 14 year-old doesn't fully understand right from wrong, nor could he understand the possible implications of such actions.
Forbidding your child from taking part in actions that could have severe consequences is hardly "child abuse." Allowing your child to do whatever he/she pleases, is much more akin to that.
But thank you for answering my earlier question about what's wrong with people.
Thanks for your opinion.
The child abuse comment I made was in reference to forcing personal religious beliefs on a child. I would also agree that allowing them to run rampant would be classified the same. There are ways, however, to find a middle ground.
Furthermore, forbidding you child from anything doesn't stop them from doing it, it just gets them into trouble if the get caught doing it. It's just like a law...it doesn't stop anything, it just offers punishments if you choose to do it and get caught. In my experience very VERY few children fully obey every instruction of their parents. That's why it's such a massively ineffective tool. Compassion, understanding, and education are far more valuable and more likely to achieve the desired results.
I can completely see how you mistook me for a 15 year old though...after all, correct grammer, advanced vocabulary, well thought out responses, established patterns of critical thinking in responses...yup, I'm a child all right. Whereas your continual cheap shots and completely unreasoned arguments mark you a wise elder.
Psh.
Either way, he'll do it whether you know about it or not. It's not one of those things where he comes to you for permission. Age withholding, he'll get it any chance he gets.
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: Wingznut
Well, I'm sorry that I mistook you for a 15 year-old... It's just that is how you carry yourself.Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
I'm 32, have a degree, served in the military during time of war, and have children...I don't think there are many people who could define mature in a way that doesn't cover me.
A 14 year-old doesn't fully understand right from wrong, nor could he understand the possible implications of such actions.
Forbidding your child from taking part in actions that could have severe consequences is hardly "child abuse." Allowing your child to do whatever he/she pleases, is much more akin to that.
But thank you for answering my earlier question about what's wrong with people.
Thanks for your opinion.
The child abuse comment I made was in reference to forcing personal religious beliefs on a child. I would also agree that allowing them to run rampant would be classified the same. There are ways, however, to find a middle ground.
Furthermore, forbidding you child from anything doesn't stop them from doing it, it just gets them into trouble if the get caught doing it. It's just like a law...it doesn't stop anything, it just offers punishments if you choose to do it and get caught. In my experience very VERY few children fully obey every instruction of their parents. That's why it's such a massively ineffective tool. Compassion, understanding, and education are far more valuable and more likely to achieve the desired results.
I can completely see how you mistook me for a 15 year old though...after all, correct grammer, advanced vocabulary, well thought out responses, established patterns of critical thinking in responses...yup, I'm a child all right. Whereas your continual cheap shots and completely unreasoned arguments mark you a wise elder.
Psh.
way to go taking the high road there. you completely have me convinced that you aren't a 15 yr old girl.
yup.
psh.
Originally posted by: Yolner
Originally posted by: Wingznut
Well, I'm sorry that I mistook you for a 15 year-old... It's just that is how you carry yourself.Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
I'm 32, have a degree, served in the military during time of war, and have children...I don't think there are many people who could define mature in a way that doesn't cover me.
A 14 year-old doesn't fully understand right from wrong, nor could he understand the possible implications of such actions.
Forbidding your child from taking part in actions that could have severe consequences is hardly "child abuse." Allowing your child to do whatever he/she pleases, is much more akin to that.
But thank you for answering my earlier question about what's wrong with people.
Ohh please 14 year olds understand more than you think. When i was 14 i was probably more responsible than most people are at 18. Forbidding your child from doing something will just make them want to do it more. You won't be able to shield a kid from life. You have to tell them how to be safe and let them do their thing because if you dont they will just do it secretly.
that's your opinion, unfortunately you are wrong.
at 14 your PARENTS are responsible for you, at 18 they aren't.
so no matter how much you want to claim that you are responsible at 14, ultimately you are not. your parents are
Update (sunday evening): She's been calling here a lot, 32 calls so far in a day and a half, so I printed out the vonage record and took it to my cop neighbor. So next time she called I told her I'd contacted the police. She hasn't called back since, so far.
Thanks for all the comments - I learned a lot!
My feeling is that if he isn't mature enough to make up a good story so that I leave him alone, then he's not mature enough to be sleeping with anyone, much less an older woman. And if she's dumb enough to call MY phone number, then she doesn't deserve any nookie, either.
Thanks for all the comments - I learned a lot!
My feeling is that if he isn't mature enough to make up a good story so that I leave him alone, then he's not mature enough to be sleeping with anyone, much less an older woman. And if she's dumb enough to call MY phone number, then she doesn't deserve any nookie, either.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 22K
-
News NVIDIA and Intel to Develop AI Infrastructure and Personal Computing Products- Started by poke01
- Replies: 384
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
Facebook
Twitter