Orange stain second term results thread

Page 297 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

outriding

Diamond Member
Feb 20, 2002
4,686
4,206
136
The impact areas for 155mm artillery training is on the far eastern side of Pendleton. The point of the 155 artillery training would be to support units farther inland not just at the beach environment.

The Marines felt confident enough to fire rounds over the Freeway Friday evening and the interstate was not closed. So why would firing over a highway be perfectly safe in Sweden but not in the US?

To prepare for Saturday’s event, artillery rounds from M777 howitzers were fired from Red Beach east over Interstate 5 on Friday evening as a test run, said Capt. Gregory Dreibelbis, a spokesman for the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force, which is based at Camp Pendleton. Vehicular traffic along the interstate was not closed off while the artillery guns were firing, he said in a statement.

M777 artillery pieces have historically been fired during routine training from land-based artillery firing points west of I-5 into impact areas east of the interstate within existing safety protocols and without the need to close the route,” Capt. Dreibelbis said. He called the test firings an “established and safe practice” as a rehearsal for Saturday’s event.

And just recently Kegseth limits the stories that come out of the armed forces.

You are awful quick to believe the current government press while need proof for everything else
 

Brovane

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2001
6,540
2,678
136
And just recently Kegseth limits the stories that come out of the armed forces.

You are awful quick to believe the current government press while need proof for everything else

The NY Times is the government press now? Weird.
 

you2

Diamond Member
Apr 2, 2002
7,170
2,210
136
The impact areas for 155mm artillery training is on the far eastern side of Pendleton. The point of the 155 artillery training would be to support units farther inland not just at the beach environment.

The Marines felt confident enough to fire rounds over the Freeway Friday evening and the interstate was not closed. So why would firing over a highway be perfectly safe in Sweden but not in the US?

To prepare for Saturday’s event, artillery rounds from M777 howitzers were fired from Red Beach east over Interstate 5 on Friday evening as a test run, said Capt. Gregory Dreibelbis, a spokesman for the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force, which is based at Camp Pendleton. Vehicular traffic along the interstate was not closed off while the artillery guns were firing, he said in a statement.

M777 artillery pieces have historically been fired during routine training from land-based artillery firing points west of I-5 into impact areas east of the interstate within existing safety protocols and without the need to close the route,” Capt. Dreibelbis said. He called the test firings an “established and safe practice” as a rehearsal for Saturday’s event.
 

Brovane

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2001
6,540
2,678
136
Weird you comment on things you have no idea about them

I think you are missing something.

If the USMC says this was established procedure to fire 155mm over the I-5 freeway, how many times in the last decade was this done? The USMC fired over the freeway on Friday evening and didn't think much about it.

I think asking these questions and pressing for answers will help determine if the Marines had been telling the truth or not.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,885
48,659
136
So if I understand this right the US military blew up a boat full of fishermen who were in distress (lying that they were cartel), the Colombian president complained about it, Trump called the Colombian president a criminal and shut off US aid which mostly helps them combat drug orgs, and now the Colombians have recalled their ambassador.

Somebody call the Nobel committee.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: hal2kilo

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
14,066
11,786
136
So if I understand this right the US military blew up a boat full of fishermen who were in distress (lying that they were cartel), the Colombian president complained about it, Trump called the Colombian president a criminal and shut off US aid which mostly helps them combat drug orgs, and now the Colombians have recalled their ambassador.

Somebody call the Nobel committee.


Is this also the one (sorry, there's too many to keep track of now) where the two surviving "narco-terrorists" were also released back to their home country? Because, you know, we always love to release terrorists for no real reasons.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,267
55,851
136
So now in essentially an admission they are committing murder the US is releasing the two survivors of the most recent ship we attacked.

Meaning these people were so bad they had to be killed but not bad enough to be prosecuted.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,997
31,564
146
So now in essentially an admission they are committing murder the US is releasing the two survivors of the most recent ship we attacked.

Meaning these people were so bad they had to be killed but not bad enough to be prosecuted.

yeah, funny that

Epstein files. release them
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,885
48,659
136
So now in essentially an admission they are committing murder the US is releasing the two survivors of the most recent ship we attacked.

Meaning these people were so bad they had to be killed but not bad enough to be prosecuted.

So guilty we missiled the boat, rescued them, and are going to repatriate.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
30,349
31,434
136
So now in essentially an admission they are committing murder the US is releasing the two survivors of the most recent ship we attacked.

Meaning these people were so bad they had to be killed but not bad enough to be prosecuted.
Honestly just kinda shocked they didn't try to send them to Gitmo our default extralegal prison.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,727
10,486
136
So now in essentially an admission they are committing murder the US is releasing the two survivors of the most recent ship we attacked.

Meaning these people were so bad they had to be killed but not bad enough to be prosecuted.
I’m having trouble keeping track of all the war crimes now—but weren’t these two survivors allegedly from the narco submarine that they sank? Are we going to find out next that this wasn’t actually a submarine—or am I confusing this with a separate incident? I could’ve sworn we were told that the 2 survivors were piloting a submarine that had no legitimate purpose other than smuggling drugs and/or people.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
14,066
11,786
136
Honestly just kinda shocked they didn't try to send them to Gitmo our default extralegal prison.

Yep. There is no way that they'd release those 2 if they really thought they were in any way traffickers/terrorists. Black site, do not pass go.
 

you2

Diamond Member
Apr 2, 2002
7,170
2,210
136
Lots of interesting information in this article:
a) Administration is lying about just about everything (no surprise)
b) Administration is hurting the war on drugs for political wins (no surprise)
c) Administration knows it is deporting innocent people (no surprise)
d) ....

 
  • Wow
Reactions: hal2kilo

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
36,496
10,769
136
I’m having trouble keeping track of all the war crimes now
President "War Crimes" is keeping it real. We're up to 7 boats destroyed by US military.
At this point, I have to assume US forces will squat in the region and just keep randomly killing people.
United States is the bigger Israel now, and brown people are our Palestinians.