Moody's warns it may cut California's debt rating

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Originally posted by: GTKeeper
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Look what happens when you have a $8+ minimum wage, and tax the shit out of corporations.

Goodbye jobs. Goodbye industry. Goodbye tax revenue.

A nice closed-minded post.

What are you an economics professor?

Explain where my logic is wrong please:

Businesses leave because labor costs are too high and they get taxed too much.

That and retarded regulations - look up the recent proposition that regulates how much space you must have to have a chicken farm in cali. That industry will be dead in 5 years in that state.

chicken
 

GTKeeper

Golden Member
Apr 14, 2005
1,118
0
0
To Ocguy31 and winnar111:

Since you clearly are generalizing and pulling things out of thin air, let me answer this question for you.

The reason Cali has a 14 billion dollar shortfall:

1. There is roughly a 7.5 billion dollar shortfall in capital gains taxes alone, compared to last year.

2. The amount of corporate taxes collected will be 2 billion less than last year because companies like BANKS for example are posting losses and not profits.

3. Property tax collection will be about half a billion less.

With just these 3 items, you have 10 billion dollars of income that isn't there anymore.

Now is this 10 billion dollar shortfall due to 8 dollar minimum wage and companies leaving in droves as you guys claim? Of course not.

Does this 10 billion dollar shortfall have anything to do with the collapsed housing market? I am thinking just maybe, just maybe.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
Originally posted by: K3N
30 billion went to BofA, yet Cali couldn't get a fraction of that. Hey folks if Cali goes bankrupt, the 92 la riots will look like a victory parade.

Sure let the federal government take over the governing process...

This is what happens when you let people, not representatives, govern a state - IQ mean regression in action. Instead of people with public policy and law degrees, you get idiots passing populist propositions as law.
 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
37
91
Originally posted by: GTKeeper
To Ocguy31 and winnar111:

Since you clearly are generalizing and pulling things out of thin air, let me answer this question for you.

The reason Cali has a 14 billion dollar shortfall:

1. There is roughly a 7.5 billion dollar shortfall in capital gains taxes alone, compared to last year.

2. The amount of corporate taxes collected will be 2 billion less than last year because companies like BANKS for example are posting losses and not profits.

3. Property tax collection will be about half a billion less.

With just these 3 items, you have 10 billion dollars of income that isn't there anymore.

Now is this 10 billion dollar shortfall due to 8 dollar minimum wage and companies leaving in droves as you guys claim? Of course not.

Does this 10 billion dollar shortfall have anything to do with the collapsed housing market? I am thinking just maybe, just maybe.



2. That is part of it, but outsourcing and business flight are permanent and will continue to suck the state dry of jobs and revenue

3. Property taxes go to the counties
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: winnar111


It's a shame what liberals have done to the great state of Reagan.

Yes, yes yes... We all know, that everything bad that happens is ALL the liberals fault. Forget about the fact that most of CA's recent governors have been Republicans... Dukemejian, Wilson, Shwarzeneggar Its all irrellevant. Damn liberals.

Can we just move on already?
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,198
126
BTW, CA will get a federal bailout, and then some. You just watch. States running out of cash would be absolutely catastrophic in this environment, even more so than banks going bankrupt.
 

winnar111

Banned
Mar 10, 2008
2,847
0
0
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: winnar111


It's a shame what liberals have done to the great state of Reagan.

Yes, yes yes... We all know, that everything bad that happens is ALL the liberals fault. Forget about the fact that most of CA's recent governors have been Republicans... Dukemejian, Wilson, Shwarzeneggar Its all irrellevant. Damn liberals.

Can we just move on already?

Arnold is a liberal.
 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Bitter rage posted by: wanker111
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Maybe they should get the same percentage of Federal Taxes paid out back like N Carolina does. That would help their credit rating quite a bit.

Why? That doesn't mesh with your Robin Hood agenda.
Because it's important to the health of the National Economy that a State like California that contributes so much to the Treasury through Federal taxes stay afloat unlike an insignificant state like..ohh..N.Carolina.

you could make the same argument with individual taxation.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,198
126
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: winnar111


It's a shame what liberals have done to the great state of Reagan.

Yes, yes yes... We all know, that everything bad that happens is ALL the liberals fault. Forget about the fact that most of CA's recent governors have been Republicans... Dukemejian, Wilson, Shwarzeneggar Its all irrellevant. Damn liberals.

Can we just move on already?

Arnold is a liberal.

That's funny, he was supported by conservatives here in CA.
 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
37
91
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: winnar111


It's a shame what liberals have done to the great state of Reagan.

Yes, yes yes... We all know, that everything bad that happens is ALL the liberals fault. Forget about the fact that most of CA's recent governors have been Republicans... Dukemejian, Wilson, Shwarzeneggar Its all irrellevant. Damn liberals.

Can we just move on already?

Arnold is a liberal.

That's funny, he was supported by conservatives here in CA.



Which has what to do with policy? :confused:
 

winnar111

Banned
Mar 10, 2008
2,847
0
0
Originally posted by: GTKeeper
To Ocguy31 and winnar111:

Since you clearly are generalizing and pulling things out of thin air, let me answer this question for you.

The reason Cali has a 14 billion dollar shortfall:

1. There is roughly a 7.5 billion dollar shortfall in capital gains taxes alone, compared to last year.

2. The amount of corporate taxes collected will be 2 billion less than last year because companies like BANKS for example are posting losses and not profits.

3. Property tax collection will be about half a billion less.

With just these 3 items, you have 10 billion dollars of income that isn't there anymore.

Now is this 10 billion dollar shortfall due to 8 dollar minimum wage and companies leaving in droves as you guys claim? Of course not.

Does this 10 billion dollar shortfall have anything to do with the collapsed housing market? I am thinking just maybe, just maybe.

Millionaires fleeing the state certainly contributes to the drop in capital gains tax.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,198
126
CA gravy train (where we pay way more to feds than we take in) is coming to an end. Now we are gonna get what's ours. :)
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,198
126
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: winnar111


It's a shame what liberals have done to the great state of Reagan.

Yes, yes yes... We all know, that everything bad that happens is ALL the liberals fault. Forget about the fact that most of CA's recent governors have been Republicans... Dukemejian, Wilson, Shwarzeneggar Its all irrellevant. Damn liberals.

Can we just move on already?

Arnold is a liberal.

That's funny, he was supported by conservatives here in CA.



Which has what to do with policy? :confused:

Why would conservatives support him if they didn't like his policies?
 

GTKeeper

Golden Member
Apr 14, 2005
1,118
0
0
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: GTKeeper
To Ocguy31 and winnar111:

Since you clearly are generalizing and pulling things out of thin air, let me answer this question for you.

The reason Cali has a 14 billion dollar shortfall:

1. There is roughly a 7.5 billion dollar shortfall in capital gains taxes alone, compared to last year.

2. The amount of corporate taxes collected will be 2 billion less than last year because companies like BANKS for example are posting losses and not profits.

3. Property tax collection will be about half a billion less.

With just these 3 items, you have 10 billion dollars of income that isn't there anymore.

Now is this 10 billion dollar shortfall due to 8 dollar minimum wage and companies leaving in droves as you guys claim? Of course not.

Does this 10 billion dollar shortfall have anything to do with the collapsed housing market? I am thinking just maybe, just maybe.

Millionaires fleeing the state certainly contributes to the drop in capital gains tax.


Right and the 35%+ decline in the S&P has nothing to do with it. Get your head out of your ass seriously.
 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
37
91
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: winnar111


It's a shame what liberals have done to the great state of Reagan.

Yes, yes yes... We all know, that everything bad that happens is ALL the liberals fault. Forget about the fact that most of CA's recent governors have been Republicans... Dukemejian, Wilson, Shwarzeneggar Its all irrellevant. Damn liberals.

Can we just move on already?

Arnold is a liberal.

That's funny, he was supported by conservatives here in CA.



Which has what to do with policy? :confused:

Why would conservatives support him if they didn't like his policies?


Because for CA, having a middle-ground guy is refreshing after "give illegals drivers licenses" Mr. Davis.
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: winnar111


It's a shame what liberals have done to the great state of Reagan.

Yes, yes yes... We all know, that everything bad that happens is ALL the liberals fault. Forget about the fact that most of CA's recent governors have been Republicans... Dukemejian, Wilson, Shwarzeneggar Its all irrellevant. Damn liberals.

Can we just move on already?

Arnold is a liberal.

Well, there you have it... Everything bad that happens is all the liberals fault. This entire mess our country is in is the fault of the liberals.

You win.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,198
126
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: winnar111


It's a shame what liberals have done to the great state of Reagan.

Yes, yes yes... We all know, that everything bad that happens is ALL the liberals fault. Forget about the fact that most of CA's recent governors have been Republicans... Dukemejian, Wilson, Shwarzeneggar Its all irrellevant. Damn liberals.

Can we just move on already?

Arnold is a liberal.

That's funny, he was supported by conservatives here in CA.



Which has what to do with policy? :confused:

Why would conservatives support him if they didn't like his policies?


Because for CA, having a middle-ground guy is refreshing after "give illegals drivers licenses" Mr. Davis.

Ah, OK, so Arnold is a "liberal" and a "middle-ground guy"
Nice to know that Liberalism is the new middle ground :)
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
36,437
10,730
136
Originally posted by: GTKeeper
Originally posted by: winnar111
Millionaires fleeing the state certainly contributes to the drop in capital gains tax.
Right and the 35%+ decline in the S&P has nothing to do with it. Get your head out of your ass seriously.

He said nothing about the S&P.

Are you denying that many of us who could flee California haven't already done so? The illegals who replace us aren't going to fund lavish social programs.
 

winnar111

Banned
Mar 10, 2008
2,847
0
0
Originally posted by: GTKeeper
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: GTKeeper
To Ocguy31 and winnar111:

Since you clearly are generalizing and pulling things out of thin air, let me answer this question for you.

The reason Cali has a 14 billion dollar shortfall:

1. There is roughly a 7.5 billion dollar shortfall in capital gains taxes alone, compared to last year.

2. The amount of corporate taxes collected will be 2 billion less than last year because companies like BANKS for example are posting losses and not profits.

3. Property tax collection will be about half a billion less.

With just these 3 items, you have 10 billion dollars of income that isn't there anymore.

Now is this 10 billion dollar shortfall due to 8 dollar minimum wage and companies leaving in droves as you guys claim? Of course not.

Does this 10 billion dollar shortfall have anything to do with the collapsed housing market? I am thinking just maybe, just maybe.

Millionaires fleeing the state certainly contributes to the drop in capital gains tax.


Right and the 35%+ decline in the S&P has nothing to do with it. Get your head out of your ass seriously.

http://www.latimes.com/news/lo...1feb21,0,6427050.story

SACRAMENTO -- California's budget shortfall has swollen to $16 billion from $14.5 billion, according to the state's chief budget analyst, who says the governor's proposal for closing the deficit is so flawed that her office took the rare step of drafting an alternative state spending plan for legislators to consider.



Your budget shortfall of $16 billion existed before that happened. Plenty of people had gains in the first half of 2008, but of course, they were already in Nevada. Of course, that $16b has grown to $42b over 18 months.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: GTKeeper
Originally posted by: winnar111
Millionaires fleeing the state certainly contributes to the drop in capital gains tax.
Right and the 35%+ decline in the S&P has nothing to do with it. Get your head out of your ass seriously.

He said nothing about the S&P.

Are you denying that many of us who could flee California haven't already done so? The illegals who replace us aren't going to fund lavish social programs.

I have to admit it became too expensive for me to stay but I've yet to find a place even remotely as nice as CA was prior to the tech boom. That place probably doesn't exist in America anymore.
 

GTKeeper

Golden Member
Apr 14, 2005
1,118
0
0
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: GTKeeper
Originally posted by: winnar111
Millionaires fleeing the state certainly contributes to the drop in capital gains tax.
Right and the 35%+ decline in the S&P has nothing to do with it. Get your head out of your ass seriously.

He said nothing about the S&P.

Are you denying that many of us who could flee California haven't already done so? The illegals who replace us aren't going to fund lavish social programs.

I am not denying anything. But what I am arguing is that California's budget problems are not due to an 8 dollar minimum wage and companies leaving the state in droves like Ocguy is claiming.

They are mainly due to massive equity/wealth destruction caused by the housing market. Look at each of the states that are in trouble. Taxes are way down because people lost their shirts in the markets and are not going to pay into the states as much as they did last year.

The main irresponsible act of the states is that they assumed (like almost everyone) that budget revenues would go up forever at a decent rate.
 

Mursilis

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2001
7,756
11
81
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Maybe they should get the same percentage of Federal Taxes paid out back like N Carolina does. That would help their credit rating quite a bit.

If Californians are so unhappy with the amount of money they get back from Washington, maybe they should stop sending so much? And yet, they continue to elect the sort of politicians who contribute to thier own undoing. Way to go, California.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,250
55,801
136
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Maybe they should get the same percentage of Federal Taxes paid out back like N Carolina does. That would help their credit rating quite a bit.

If Californians are so unhappy with the amount of money they get back from Washington, maybe they should stop sending so much? And yet, they continue to elect the sort of politicians who contribute to thier own undoing. Way to go, California.

Maybe Californians vote based on more than one issue.

Regardless, California's budget problems stem far more from an inability of its legislature to function than anything else. Because of a retarded provision in the state constitution it requires a 2/3rds majority to pass a budget. This has allowed a minority of lawmakers to completely destroy the budgetary process, and render the legislature incapable of functioning.

The basic story is that the Republican minority in California has said that they will not allow any taxes to be raised. They are a small and shrinking portion of the legislature, but still more than 1/3rd. The Democratic majority, with the support of the governor has attempted to compromise them by closing the budget gap created by the current housing price collapse partially through tax increases and partially through spending cuts. The Republicans have refused, and so instead... nothing has happened, and now California can't pay its bills.
 

Xavier434

Lifer
Oct 14, 2002
10,373
1
0
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Kick out the illegals FTW?

Nah, just do what Texas does. Set up strict borders 100 miles within your actual state borders allowing the illegals to pour in but only go so far so they can work the farms and get paid pennies under the table tax free. Then you can also do what they do which is get really conservative about social services so you don't have to help your actual legal citizens much, but more importantly you get to take advantage of that cheap illegal labor while preventing them from leeching off your budget much more than the other states that actually try to help their legal citizens.

Oh and if you really want to go for the gold, you can lower your business taxes a ton in comparison to other states in almost a predatory pricing fashion in order to convince businesses to move to your state. Of course, if all states followed by example then not only would they be in bad shape due to all the budget cuts, but it would completely leave Texas at a disadvantage because those businesses don't really have a reason to remain there anymore. The states would essentially be in a price war and that is something governments cannot do. They are not businesses. They are not selling anything and their goal is not profit.

After all that, you get to do what winnar does all of the time which is brag about Texas and their government when the truth is they are just putting a shroud over themselves while placing their budget in the front row for people to become distracted.