Kamala vs the Orange Felon - Presidential Race 2024 - Polls, News, Etc...

Page 159 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
15,606
10,870
136

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
40,505
9,990
136
If you ever wanted to know how things got this fucked up.. just go back to the creation of fox news by wealthy people and it has spiraled from there into half the country living in a fictional reality!
I don't subscribe to anything that would get me fox news. My weekday news is ABC, and they appear to like Kamala and dislike Donald, which suits me fine. There seems to be no way of avoiding some exposure (filtered!!!) to fox news, and what I see is usually really really annoying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Indus

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
40,505
9,990
136
Trump famously loves props.
It's because, underneath it all he's a creep. A swath of American flags behind him any time possible. Been going on for months. Noticed Kamala's been having some of that the last week or so, which isn't stupid considering what Donald does at every opportunity.
 
Last edited:

ondma

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2018
3,302
1,685
136
I mean this is basically how Biden won Arizona so yeah they do actually exist as an electoral force. If they didn't Harris would not be trying to court them so extensively.
Maybe, but the the political environment has changed. In 2020, Biden had no presidential baggage, since of course, he was not in office. Trump OTOH, had the baggage of a horribly mismanaged Covid pandemic. This alone, IMO, was enough to sway a significant number of on the fence voters. Now it is the other way around. Trump has somehow convinced a significant number of people that he will magically take us back to the times of low prices, more disposable income, low crime, and world peace. Kamala, OTOH, is burdened with the (real or imagined) problems of inflation, immigration, crime, and simultaneous military conflicts in Israel and the Ukraine. (Yes, I know we are not militarily directly involved, but both conflicts are draining our military and economic resources, and could easily erupt into much wider conflict.)

With the effectiveness of attack ads and bashing on social media, it seems to me it is almost better to be the party out of office in a presidential election now, in contrast to previously, when it was an advantage to be the party in office.
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
40,505
9,990
136
Yeah but unfortunately it doesn't determine votes.

Ya know, the usual excuses like "I'm voting for policy, not character" etc.
Only time I've seen that is in an email from a family in-law about 2 weeks ago, but he stated it as "policy not personality." It was a mysterious email, hinting at endorsing Trump. I responded cc-ing everybody saying that if he thought I'd vote for Trump he "must be delusional or dreaming." He needed to be countered. He listens to talk radio a bunch, at least did when I visited them some 10 or so years ago. I guess that all tends to be right wing.

I continued in my email, "personality >>> policy" when it comes to POTUS.

Only my sister pitched in, leaning heavily for Kamala and worrying intensely about the fate of women in America. Everyone else either silent or vaguely wishing people well ...
 
Last edited:

ondma

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2018
3,302
1,685
136
Only time I've seen that is in an email from a family in-law about 2 weeks ago, but he stated it as "policy not personality." It was a mysterious email, hinting at endorsing Trump. I responded cc-ing everybody saying that if he thought I'd vote for Trump he must be "delusional or dreaming." He needed to be countered. He listens to talk radio a bunch, at least did when I visited them some 10 or so years ago. I guess that all tends to be right wing.

I said "personality >>> policy" when it comes to POTUS.
I haven't heard it personally from family, but I have heard it from several prominent Rep figures on talk shows and interviews. Unfortunately, I cant remember a lot of them, but I am pretty sure Chris Sununu of New Hampshire stated this. I also think Nicky Haley, after bashing Trump when campaigning against him, said she will not vote for Harris. Of course, then you have Mitch McConnell and McCarthy who both attacked Trump after Jan 6, but who now will not stand up against him.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,101
45,080
136
In 2020, Biden had no presidential baggage, since of course, he was not in office.

Except for being Obama's VP for eight years?

Trump OTOH, had the baggage of a horribly mismanaged Covid pandemic. This alone, IMO, was enough to sway a significant number of on the fence voters.

The issue of Trump not only mismanaging the actual pandemic but mismanaging the politics of it was indeed a problem. Telling everybody you did a great job when they don't think so somehow didn't work out.

Now it is the other way around. Trump has somehow convinced a significant number of people that he will magically take us back to the times of low prices, more disposable income, low crime, and world peace.

Rose colored rear view mirrors are a thing than happens to be sure. People often tend to remember the past more favorably than it was and often massively inaccurately. My own dad who lived through the 60s (Vietnam and associated protests, political bombings huge race riots, etc) told me 2020 was worse when that is just objectively not true.

Kamala, OTOH, is burdened with the (real or imagined) problems of inflation, immigration, crime, and simultaneous military conflicts in Israel and the Ukraine. (Yes, I know we are not militarily directly involved, but both conflicts are draining our military and economic resources, and could easily erupt into much wider conflict.)

Voters seem to hold her less responsible for this. Ds/Indies especially more than happy about the swap and it shows in the surveys. Expenditures on Ukraine and Israel are pretty trivial in terms of the overall US budget and support for continuing it is relatively strong amongst the electorate.


With the effectiveness of attack ads and bashing on social media, it seems to me it is almost better to be the party out of office in a presidential election now, in contrast to previously, when it was an advantage to be the party in office.

A wave of anti-incumbency sentiment has swept western democracies with varied results. Some places its pushed the right out of power, some places the center/left. Seems like a post-pandemic hangover with people mostly grumpy about the econ situation. Though the grumpiness here is a lot less than abroad because we have done way better. It still exists but if it was as bad then the Ds would not have any chance this year.
 

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,255
136
Need a hell of a lot more of folks like that.


I think also just pointing out that his own VP, Secretary of Defense, National Security advisors, prior Chief of Staffs, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, among others not endorsing him, and furthermore denouncing him it’s important for those people who are swingy. If that doesn’t set off alarm bells and stick, then nothing will. That goes right to the heart of fitness and sound mind to be at the helm of the most powerful economy and military in the world.
(Let alone all the other points on tariffs, inflation, climate, abortion, J6/lying about nearly everything, etc.)
All those people need to go on video against him.
 

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,255
136
If a campaign roughly spends a billion and someone like Musk enters the late stage with a 100 million dollar donation + the Twitter factor ... how are you gonna combat that?
Should be with laws, too bad the USSC is a political organization for the ultra rich.
 

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,255
136
Probably, but it is a close race between the EC and the for life appointments to the Supreme Court.
I agree, the lack of terms on judges is a big issue. But without the EC we'd probably have a 7-2 liberal court right now.

To be far, the EC could be massively repaired if we'd expand the HOR to an appropriate level. This should be a top priority of Democrats if they ever get a trifecta again, but I've never heard them talk about it.
 
Nov 17, 2019
13,245
7,854
136
I agree, the lack of terms on judges is a big issue. But without the EC we'd probably have a 7-2 liberal court right now.

To be far, the EC could be massively repaired if we'd expand the HOR to an appropriate level. This should be a top priority of Democrats if they ever get a trifecta again, but I've never heard them talk about it.
You spelled McConnell wrong.
 

ondma

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2018
3,302
1,685
136
Except for being Obama's VP for eight years?



The issue of Trump not only mismanaging the actual pandemic but mismanaging the politics of it was indeed a problem. Telling everybody you did a great job when they don't think so somehow didn't work out.



Rose colored rear view mirrors are a thing than happens to be sure. People often tend to remember the past more favorably than it was and often massively inaccurately. My own dad who lived through the 60s (Vietnam and associated protests, political bombings huge race riots, etc) told me 2020 was worse when that is just objectively not true.



Voters seem to hold her less responsible for this. Ds/Indies especially more than happy about the swap and it shows in the surveys. Expenditures on Ukraine and Israel are pretty trivial in terms of the overall US budget and support for continuing it is relatively strong amongst the electorate.




A wave of anti-incumbency sentiment has swept western democracies with varied results. Some places its pushed the right out of power, some places the center/left. Seems like a post-pandemic hangover with people mostly grumpy about the econ situation. Though the grumpiness here is a lot less than abroad because we have done way better. It still exists but if it was as bad then the Ds would not have any chance this year.
True about Biden being VP, but TBH, I think things were better under Obama than they were under the last 4 years of Biden. Obama left with a rescued economy from the Rep crisis, low inflation, less problems with immigration, and no major world conflicts. Very little actually to attack Biden on from Obama's record compared to the current situation.
 

ondma

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2018
3,302
1,685
136
All those people need to go on video against him.
I really dont think it would sway many voters. They would just attribute to "unhappy ex employees". Everybody knows who Trump is, the Dems just need to give a platform that makes moderates/independents want to vote for them.
 

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
8,086
8,952
136
Counter point:
If Bernie (and his followers) hadn't been such whiny cunts, we'd have had the most qualified president in modern history.
Sanders fully endorsed Clinton.

The blame rests squarely on dumb people who think they're clever, and fascists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uclaLabrat

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
62,125
17,922
136
Sanders fully endorsed Clinton.

The blame rests squarely on dumb people who think they're clever, and fascists.
The media giving him gobs of free coverage, the Comey letter, I don't think it's worth trying to pin it on a single simple cause.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,101
45,080
136
I agree, the lack of terms on judges is a big issue. But without the EC we'd probably have a 7-2 liberal court right now.

To be far, the EC could be massively repaired if we'd expand the HOR to an appropriate level. This should be a top priority of Democrats if they ever get a trifecta again, but I've never heard them talk about it.

House enlargement, while totally worthwhile, would not impact EC outcomes. It should be done away with entirely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brainonska511

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
13,178
3,955
136
True about Biden being VP, but TBH, I think things were better under Obama than they were under the last 4 years of Biden. Obama left with a rescued economy from the Rep crisis, low inflation, less problems with immigration, and no major world conflicts. Very little actually to attack Biden on from Obama's record compared to the current situation.
After the Great Recession, the economy took quite a long time to heal. Those years were hardly full of steak and lobster dinners, but IMHO Dems did set the table for a solid economy after Obama's terms ended.

Obama infamously was called the Deporter in Chief, so I'm not sure how you can say there were "less problems with immigration." The problem now is what it's been over multiple presidencies, although yes it's a little more severe.

Finally, in 2017 WE were still mired in AF's forever war and Russia had already stolen Crimea back in 2014.

No disrespect intended, but you often roll out these Faux News talking points that don't really hold up under scrutiny (i.e. you said military aid to UA and Israel are draining us. Categorically false).
 

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
8,086
8,952
136
The media giving him gobs of free coverage, the Comey letter, I don't think it's worth trying to pin it on a single simple cause.
I put the blame exactly where it lies.

Dumb people who think they're clever (anyone who voted third party or stayed home because they're pure of heart), and fascists who affirmatively voted for the self-described Strongman.

Ain't no one else to blame. Those two groups are 100% the cause of Trump winning in 2016.
 
Nov 17, 2019
13,245
7,854
136
I say again, if Joe had run, Donny might (probably would?) not have been the (R) candidate at all.

Donny was a reaction to her ... the response of the many millions that outright despised her with every fiber of their being.
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
40,505
9,990
136
I put the blame exactly where it lies.

Dumb people who think they're clever (anyone who voted third party or stayed home because they're pure of heart), and fascists who affirmatively voted for the self-described Strongman.

Ain't no one else to blame. Those two groups are 100% the cause of Trump winning in 2016.
At this point (come Nov. 5, 2024) any US citizen eligible to vote who has not taken advantage of the opportunity to vote for the first female president of the USA is in my view an ignoramus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nickqt