Is saving yourself for marriage usually because...

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

TruePaige

Diamond Member
Oct 22, 2006
9,874
2
0
Originally posted by: QurazyQuisp
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
I'm sure if I went to parties and what not I'm sure it wouldn't take too long. I am saving myself for that one special girl whom God has planned for me in my life-- and it is going to be worth the wait I'm sure :)

QFT

Not to mention, I'm not financially able to support the consequences of the action. (Kids)

Annnd that's why they invented birth control.
 

E equals MC2

Banned
Apr 16, 2006
2,676
1
0
Mostly and especially in this forum Yes.

But I do know where legitimate ppl come from. I use to be a hard core Christian and knew plenty of hot girls and 'good looking' guys saving themselves.

I was too until I met my first 16 yo C-cup GF at 19. LOL.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,695
31,043
146
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
Originally posted by: bignateyk
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
Originally posted by: bignateyk
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
I'm sure if I went to parties and what not I'm sure it wouldn't take too long. I am saving myself for that one special girl whom God has planned for me in my life-- and it is going to be worth the wait I'm sure :)

Except for the fact that you'll be terrible at sex to start out with. Although if you get a girl who is also saving herself she won't know any different.

I've got myself a born again christian and DAMN... she's a freak in bed. I think she has the kama sutra memorized. You'd never suspect it either. She is completely innocent, and the perfect girl to take home to mom.

edit: My sister saved herself for marriage. She was with her husband for 7 years before they got married. I feel bad for my brother in law :) Oh well... at least he's getting some now.

Yet another reason to wait. If you are with someone whom you love and you know you will love until "Death parts [you]" -- why should it matter? Plus if you both had the same mindset, that girl would be equally nervous.

As for what you say "you have". I seriously hope you treat her with more respect than you are giving her on the AT Forums here.

-Kevin

Why should it matter? Because there is more to love than just emotional and spiritual. I've been with people before who I had strong feelings for emotionally and spiritually, but we didn't "click" in bed. In order to truly love someone I think you need all three components. Most people with your mindset seem to think that the physical part can be worked on as an after-thought, when it is just as important as the others.

More respect? It's a complement to her. At least to those who don't view sex as some kind of taboo subject.

I don't view it as a taboo subject.

Respect? You were openly flaunting that you have been having sex with a so called "born again Christian"!!

It matters for many reasons. Sex is a deep personal, spiritual, physical, and emotional connection. It shouldn't be so lightly thrown around.

As for not having pre-marital sex, I don't judge people who do, but it is my belief that is not what God intended.

Ephesians 5:3 says "But among you there must not be even a hint of sexual immorality, or of any kind of impurity, or of greed, because these are improper for God's holy people."

That is sexual immorality because the Bible defines sex and something between a man and a woman after they have been married.

That in mind, look in L&R's forum. Count the number of threads where people are posting about their significant other not putting out, or that the sex isn't good anymore, or something to that effect. Look at all the relationships in that forum where the two people are struggling based on sexual reasons.

-Kevin

first, how can you describe sex as "a deep personal, spiritual, physical, and emotional connection," without ever having known it? It's different for different people, to define it as some holy paragon of human experience is ludicrious. It's a natural thing. Sure, it is amazing, it's fun, some enjoy it only when they feel a deep emotional connection to their partner, some enjoy it simply because it releases a shit-load of endorphins. It's been with humans since before we created God, so let's not retroactively stamp it with a holier-than-it-deserves label :p

your verse, as it stands, says nothing about pre-marital sex. you have placed your own definition of "sexual-immorality" into a verse that claims it is unfavorable to God. I claim "sexual-immorality" means having sex with dogs, nothing more. it still works in that verse from Ephesians. Strange though, how it still makes sense, without me having to think that pre-marital sex is immoral. Strange how the Bible accepts any meaning you want to put into it.... Almost as if it were designed as a guidebook to live well and decent amongst our fellow humans, yet a piss-poor document to determine laws and set-in-stone rules by which we must live and abide. Hmmmm...
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,695
31,043
146
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
Originally posted by: TruePaige
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
Originally posted by: Xavier434
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek

Yet another reason to wait. If you are with someone whom you love and you know you will love until "Death parts [you]" -- why should it matter? Plus if you both had the same mindset, that girl would be equally nervous.

As for what you say "you have". I seriously hope you treat her with more respect than you are giving her on the AT Forums here.

-Kevin

I understand that you look towards the book for guidance and direction, but you really shouldn't let that stop you from listening to those who are far more experienced than you are. You have never been married and you have never had sex. You have no experience. If you ask the majority of people who are married and have been married for a while they will tell you how important being sexually compatible is despite your love and commitment towards the woman. I'm not saying that your way doesn't work for some people and nor am I saying that you should do something which you do not believe is right, but just understand that the odds are against you if you continue walking this path.

I know it isn't easy. Not something you guys want to hear more than likely, but Jesus being crucified wasn't easy either.

Your argument is pointless, he's doing it because of God. I agree with you on the emotional/spiritual/physical though. I consider myself a Christian, but don't agree with the "premarital sex is bad" clause.

I don't mean to come off as rude or judgemental in anyway, but I honestly don't know how you can call yourself a Christian when you don't agree with God's word completely. The Bible, as you know, didn't say to believe part of its teachings. What don't you agree with about it? Not in anyway trying to mislead you, but I am curious and merely interested in the discussion.

I'm not doing it because of God. I'm doing it for God.

-Kevin

Do you do any kind of work on Sunday's? Ever?

Do you eat shellfish?

I'm sure you don't follow everything in there, so you're just coming off as a hypocrite.

Ironically enough, I do not eat shellfish :p. I'm not too big on sea food.

As for the "Remember the Sabbath Day and keep it Holy" (ie: Sunday) you are misinterpreting the commandment.

-cut-

-Kevin

so ah, why should we, or anyone else, accept that your interpretations of verses/commandments are the correct ones? Is it b/c pastor Dan told you how to interpret them? You know, the biggest controversy over exegesis comes from within the Church than it does among the secular. Not exactly a fine example of solidarity for "The Word."

Your defense would be "Yeah, but I know my interpretation is right."

 

seemingly random

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2007
5,277
0
0
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
I'm sure if I went to parties and what not I'm sure it wouldn't take too long. I am saving myself for that one special girl whom God has planned for me in my life-- and it is going to be worth the wait I'm sure :)
I pray that you aren't too let down if (when) it doesn't work out this way.
 

Casawi

Platinum Member
Oct 31, 2004
2,366
1
0
I am not a virgin but I think it would have been a great experience to share with someone special. I've had sex with several girls, and now I met someone (who I think is the one) from Morocco where girls almost always save themselves for marriage. I feel that it is somewhat unfair, I don't deserve her as much...I don't really how to explain it, but I wish I was a virgin for her... but again that sex from 16-24 was great stuff man ...lol
Now I know I am not getting any until we're married, if we do.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,550
940
126
Originally posted by: Casawi
I am not a virgin but I think it would have been a great experience to share with someone special. I've had sex with several girls, and now I met someone (who I think is the one) from Morocco where girls almost always save themselves for marriage. I feel that it is somewhat unfair, I don't deserve her as much...I don't really how to explain it, but I wish I was a virgin for her... but again that sex from 16-24 was great stuff man ...lol
Now I know I am not getting any until we're married, if we do.

Stop being such a drama queen. Your virginity is no big deal...neither is anyone elses.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
I had a guy friend who was saving himself for marriage... he was reasonably attractive (not my type, but I've seen him get hit-on in bars and I see the way some of my straight female friends look at him), but came from a religious (catholic) family.

I'm pretty sure he broke down when he was 28, though. I don't know for sure, because I don't talk about sex with my breeder friends, it's just weird and awkward on both sides of the conversation, but if I had to guess, I'm near positive that he hooked up with a mutual friend's sister.
 

Xavier434

Lifer
Oct 14, 2002
10,373
1
0
Originally posted by: Casawi
I am not a virgin but I think it would have been a great experience to share with someone special. I've had sex with several girls, and now I met someone (who I think is the one) from Morocco where girls almost always save themselves for marriage. I feel that it is somewhat unfair, I don't deserve her as much...I don't really how to explain it, but I wish I was a virgin for her... but again that sex from 16-24 was great stuff man ...lol
Now I know I am not getting any until we're married, if we do.

Shakespeare hates your emo poetry.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
Originally posted by: PricklyPete
For guys...most likely...

For girls...no

That pretty much sums up my thoughts. I've never known a single male that refused sex on that notion. But I have dated and known many women that are "saving" themselves.

Hell I even dated a girl for 3 years while in high school and my freshman year of college that said we had to get married soon because not being able to have sex was killing her. We had a very physicial relationship that always had a tag out sliding into home base because she wanted to save that part for marriage.

It's convenient because they can control a relationship under the guise of nobility that way.
 

mordantmonkey

Diamond Member
Dec 23, 2004
3,075
5
0
Originally posted by: PricklyPete
For guys...most likely...

For girls...no

Case in point:

Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
I'm sure if I went to parties and what not I'm sure it wouldn't take too long. I am saving myself for that one special girl whom God has planned for me in my life-- and it is going to be worth the wait I'm sure :)
 

BudAshes

Lifer
Jul 20, 2003
13,982
3,330
146
Originally posted by: vi edit
Originally posted by: PricklyPete
For guys...most likely...

For girls...no

That pretty much sums up my thoughts. I've never known a single male that refused sex on that notion. But I have dated and known many women that are "saving" themselves.

Hell I even dated a girl for 3 years while in high school and my freshman year of college that said we had to get married soon because not being able to have sex was killing her. We had a very physicial relationship that always had a tag out sliding into home base because she wanted to save that part for marriage.

It's convenient because they can control a relationship under the guise of nobility that way.

Funny thing is she probably fucked the next guy after you.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
Originally posted by: BudAshes
Originally posted by: vi edit
Originally posted by: PricklyPete
For guys...most likely...

For girls...no

That pretty much sums up my thoughts. I've never known a single male that refused sex on that notion. But I have dated and known many women that are "saving" themselves.

Hell I even dated a girl for 3 years while in high school and my freshman year of college that said we had to get married soon because not being able to have sex was killing her. We had a very physicial relationship that always had a tag out sliding into home base because she wanted to save that part for marriage.

It's convenient because they can control a relationship under the guise of nobility that way.

Funny thing is she probably fucked the next guy after you.

Nah, not this girl. She got married right after college and ended up having like 3 kids in 4 years time.
 

BudAshes

Lifer
Jul 20, 2003
13,982
3,330
146
Originally posted by: vi edit
Originally posted by: BudAshes
Originally posted by: vi edit
Originally posted by: PricklyPete
For guys...most likely...

For girls...no

That pretty much sums up my thoughts. I've never known a single male that refused sex on that notion. But I have dated and known many women that are "saving" themselves.

Hell I even dated a girl for 3 years while in high school and my freshman year of college that said we had to get married soon because not being able to have sex was killing her. We had a very physicial relationship that always had a tag out sliding into home base because she wanted to save that part for marriage.

It's convenient because they can control a relationship under the guise of nobility that way.

Funny thing is she probably fucked the next guy after you.

Nah, not this girl. She got married right after college and ended up having like 3 kids in 4 years time.

Jeebus, good thing you got away.
 

Chiropteran

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2003
9,811
110
106
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Topic Title: Is saving yourself for marriage usually because...
Topic Summary: nobody wants you?


no.

because the person they are marrying obviously wants them. :confused:

Who said they were marrying anyone? Most of the people who I have heard of as "saving themselves for marriage" are nowhere near getting married, and possibly never will.
 

Gamingphreek

Lifer
Mar 31, 2003
11,679
0
81
Jeez, I feel like I am on 20 questions right now or something. I'll give everything I can a shot, but I don't know everything about Christianity. I'm passionate about what I believe, but there is no way I can give you 100% answers on everything.

Also, it seems like many of you are flaming me almost in an attempt to get me to be angry or something. If you intent is to cause problems, can you please just keep it to spamming me with PM's so it doesn't detract from this thread? Thanks.

Oh come on now. Even though I don't agree with your choice I know you can come up with a better justification than comparing it to Jesus's crucifixion. Jesus was forced to be crucified by the will of others. No one is forcing you to remain a virgin until you get married. Even though Jesus may agree with your decision, he would also probably tell you that you are comparing apples and oranges with that example.

What it all boils down to is that you are choosing to practice the fraction of your religion which you actually have faith in while ignoring the rest just like everyone else who practices any kind of religion on this planet. It's all about faith. You have it when it comes to practicing abstinence until you are married. That is your only argument which cannot be countered properly and there is nothing wrong with that. I'm not posting here to tell you that you are wrong or to try and change your mind. I just want you to fully understand the risks you are taking and why. If you understand that and choose to do it anyways then that's fine.

Jesus was God first off. If he didn't want to be crucified he could have gotten himself out of there. One of the many perks of being almighty ;). This is the exact same thing for me (Less painful of course ;) ). I can choose at any time to disobey the commandment, but I don't. I love Jesus in the same way that Jesus loved each of us.

I challenge you to find a "fraction of my religion" in which I am ignoring. I'm not perfect, but I most definitely do not choose to ignore any aspect of my religion.

No good looking people save themselves for marriage. That's the bottom line.

Nonsense, I know plenty of amazing and attractive people who are saving themselves.

first, how can you describe sex as "a deep personal, spiritual, physical, and emotional connection," without ever having known it? It's different for different people, to define it as some holy paragon of human experience is ludicrious. It's a natural thing. Sure, it is amazing, it's fun, some enjoy it only when they feel a deep emotional connection to their partner, some enjoy it simply because it releases a shit-load of endorphins. It's been with humans since before we created God, so let's not retroactively stamp it with a holier-than-it-deserves label

your verse, as it stands, says nothing about pre-marital sex. you have placed your own definition of "sexual-immorality" into a verse that claims it is unfavorable to God. I claim "sexual-immorality" means having sex with dogs, nothing more. it still works in that verse from Ephesians. Strange though, how it still makes sense, without me having to think that pre-marital sex is immoral. Strange how the Bible accepts any meaning you want to put into it.... Almost as if it were designed as a guidebook to live well and decent amongst our fellow humans, yet a piss-poor document to determine laws and set-in-stone rules by which we must live and abide. Hmmmm...

I've never been crucified in the exact way Jesus had. Does that make it any less painful for me to know that he was nailed onto a wooden cross and tortured?? Same with sex-- just because I haven't had sex does not mean that I know nothing about it.

As for the bolded part, I don't mean to be blunt or rude, but you have that 100% backwards.

There is something to be said about endorphins being released into your body. To explore that; however, we also need to look at how you define sin.

The Bible defines sin as anything that pulls you further from God. God set us free from that sin. So by saying he set us free from sin, that must mean that sin is like shackles or chains. In short, sin ensnares us and holds us as prisoner.

If you become addicted to that feeling you are essentially being held captive in your own sin. I recently read a book "Every Young Man's Battle" and one quote I really think illustrated this well was "God loves us and hates when we are held captive with our own sin. (May not be the exact words but close enough :) ).

As for non-biblical evidence-- I believe I already provided a bunch.

Relationships are TORN apart by sex. One side is uncomfortable with the other, one side isn't as pleased as they used to be, one side only wants sex while the other wants a relationship.

Even more so, you sleep together and then the girl gets pregnant. If you aren't married (By marriage this time, I mean confessed unending love for each other as well as the time you both deemed that you are financially stable) how are you going to support this child? For some of us, what about college?

Going on, there is an embarrassment factor. If I slept with a close friend, I seriously doubt I could look at her in the exact same way ever again. I will have seen her naked among all the other physical aspects to sex.

Relationships MUST be intentional and both parties MUST be in the same place. If you didn't catch on, by getting married, people vow to all of the aforementioned things. You vow to be loving, intentional, genuine, pure, etc...

so ah, why should we, or anyone else, accept that your interpretations of verses/commandments are the correct ones? Is it b/c pastor Dan told you how to interpret them? You know, the biggest controversy over exegesis comes from within the Church than it does among the secular. Not exactly a fine example of solidarity for "The Word."

Your defense would be "Yeah, but I know my interpretation is right."

That isn't my defense at all and I don't appreciate you assuming all my answers are frail and weak.

I believe his interpretation may be wrong if he has pulled the verse out of context. The Bible is made up of books, and chapters, and verses for a reason-- you can just pull out one phrase and expect to apply it. Furthermore, NOTHING the Bible says can be taken at face value. There is always ways in which it can be applied.

Example? "Love your neighbor as yourself". That should be simple right? What about speeding? The speed limit is put in place for ours and others safety. By not following it we are certainly not valuing our life as much, and by doing that we aren't valuing other people on the road as much. Pretty cool how much everything applies :)

Getting back to the point, I don't believe anyone should TELL you how to interpret them. People, on their walks through faith, should come to their own conclusion which satisfies all of God's commandments. If they need an example, all they have to do then is to look at Jesus.

Did Sunday deter Jesus from casting out demons or healing people or preaching? No, so why should it deter me on my walk in faith? Thats what makes me believe he may have interpreted the passage wrong.

I pray that you aren't too let down if (when) it doesn't work out this way.

"When" huh? I know in my heart that God will take care of me regardless of what happens. I also know that when I find the woman of my dreams sex is going to be merely one stop on a great journey-- not something to dwell on.

I am not a virgin but I think it would have been a great experience to share with someone special. I've had sex with several girls, and now I met someone (who I think is the one) from Morocco where girls almost always save themselves for marriage. I feel that it is somewhat unfair, I don't deserve her as much...I don't really how to explain it, but I wish I was a virgin for her... but again that sex from 16-24 was great stuff man ...lol
Now I know I am not getting any until we're married, if we do.

Living example of an adverse affect-- SHAME. Not once in the Bible does God say "Shame on you".

Prodigals son. I would strongly encourage you to read the prodigals son. The more I read it the more ways it applies to life. At the end, the son, after committing so much wrong comes back in shame. The father says "or this son of mine was dead and is alive again; he was lost and is found.' So they began to celebrate.".

Its amazing, no matter what we do we are always Gods children. We are never called to be shameful-- EVER. Anyone who condemns someone for what they have done should be considered an Anti-Christ and people shouldn't pay any mind to their teachings.

God's love is unconditional-- no matter what we do, we are always his children.

Stop being such a drama queen. Your virginity is no big deal...neither is anyone elses.

This thread is about virginity so it is apparently a big deal to him and to others in this thread. If you don't care about it much, please leave and stop flaming others in this thread.

TruePaige, I am reading the verses over (Thank you so much for helping find them) right after I post this message. Old Testament takes longer to absorb than the New Testament sometimes ;)

-Kevin
 

Xavier434

Lifer
Oct 14, 2002
10,373
1
0
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek

Oh come on now. Even though I don't agree with your choice I know you can come up with a better justification than comparing it to Jesus's crucifixion. Jesus was forced to be crucified by the will of others. No one is forcing you to remain a virgin until you get married. Even though Jesus may agree with your decision, he would also probably tell you that you are comparing apples and oranges with that example.

What it all boils down to is that you are choosing to practice the fraction of your religion which you actually have faith in while ignoring the rest just like everyone else who practices any kind of religion on this planet. It's all about faith. You have it when it comes to practicing abstinence until you are married. That is your only argument which cannot be countered properly and there is nothing wrong with that. I'm not posting here to tell you that you are wrong or to try and change your mind. I just want you to fully understand the risks you are taking and why. If you understand that and choose to do it anyways then that's fine.

Jesus was God first off. If he didn't want to be crucified he could have gotten himself out of there. One of the many perks of being almighty ;). This is the exact same thing for me (Less painful of course ;) ). I can choose at any time to disobey the commandment, but I don't. I love Jesus in the same way that Jesus loved each of us.

I challenge you to find a "fraction of my religion" in which I am ignoring. I'm not perfect, but I most definitely do not choose to ignore any aspect of my religion.

I'm not going to go back and forth with you trying to find some part of your religion which you do not agree with because that's pointless. There isn't a single justification that you or anyone else can come up in regards to their religion where an equally justifiable counter argument doesn't exist. Trust me man. I have debated the topic of religion for a long time. Once all of the details and the "why?" questions are fully answered it all boils down to one thing and one thing only. Faith. EVERYTHING you believe in regards to your religion revolves 100% around faith. Nothing else actually matters in terms of material used in a debate like this one.
 

arkcom

Golden Member
Mar 25, 2003
1,816
0
76
Originally posted by: TruePaige
Hey there Gamingphreek, I don't know all the passages by heart, but I will do my best to pull references.



About the woman sitting part and the time of the month part:

( "And everything upon which she lies during her impurity shall be unclean; everything also upon which she sits shall be unclean." Leviticus 15:20).



About the Shellfish:

Leviticus 11:9-12 says:
9 These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye eat.
10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you:
11 They shall be even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye shall have their carcases in abomination.
12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.

Deuteronomy 14:9-10 says:
9 These ye shall eat of all that are in the waters: all that have fins and scales shall ye eat:
10 And whatsoever hath not fins and scales ye may not eat; it is unclean unto you.




You can find a lot about clean and unclean foods when Elohim gave the clean and unclean foods to eat in the following books:

Leviticus 11:1-47

Deuteronomy 14: 3-20

On the same note here is some background information on bibilical thoughts on pork, and how they are an unclean animal:

Isaiah 1:6 From the sole of the foot even unto the head there is no soundness in it; but wounds, and bruises, and putrifying sores: they have not been closed, neither bound up, neither mollified with ointment.

Isaiah 65:2-4 I have spread out my hands all the day unto a rebellious people, which walketh in a way that was not good, after their own thoughts; A people that provoketh me to anger continually to my face; that sacrificeth in gardens, and burneth incense upon altars of brick; Which remain among the graves, and lodge in the monuments, which eat swine's flesh, and broth of abominable things is in their vessels.

Understand this really makes God very unhappy. Your being told that God hates what the children do to their blood stream.

Isaiah 66:3 He that killeth an ox is as if he slew a man; he that sacrificeth a lamb, as if he cut off a dog's neck; he that offereth an oblation, as if he offered swine's blood; he that burneth incense, as if he blessed an idol. Yea, they have chosen their own ways, and their soul delighteth in their abominations.








Luckily, if you're trying to eat right, you can stick with Kosher Crickets:

The bible bans eating most insects, but they ahve exception for locusts, crickets and grasshoppers. (Leviticus 11:22)


Hope that helps a bit. =)

If he was Jewish these things would matter. Christ replaced the laws of the Old Testament when he died on the cross.
 

eits

Lifer
Jun 4, 2005
25,015
3
81
www.integratedssr.com
you know what's just really retarded? ending your posts with a little character signature... i mean, really... it's so goddamn stupid.

"i'm going to sign off with the angstrom symbol... oh, i'm so clever and unique..."
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
19
81
It's because you want to be locked into a permanent relationship before your spouse finds out that your genitals are actually covered in jellyfish-like stinging cells.


Why I think it is:
Possessive behavior of men. Around the world, men claim to love women, but they constantly oppress them so as to maintain a feeling of dominance, as mandated by testosterone. If a woman has not had sex with anyone else, that makes a man feel like he has some sort of ownership of her, and more specifically, like he has exclusive mating rights.

This kind of nonsense got worked into theology, so that it appeared that some powerful divine entity, instead of mere humans, was mandating this idea of virginity.
Now, thousands of years after such texts were penned, we still follow them. In some ways, progress comes quite slow for this species.



Now I'm not some extreme feminist type. I would like to see equal rights for the sexes, which does technically qualify me as a feminist - just not one of the extreme versions you'll see the news outlets showing in order to get better ratings. I also don't think men are inherently evil or something like that. They just tend to follow a lot of traditional male behaviors, some of which I find to be detrimental to society at large.

 

cdmccool

Golden Member
Mar 21, 2006
1,041
0
0
Not usually, but there are definitely people out there fronting. They're usually easy to spot.
 

Gamingphreek

Lifer
Mar 31, 2003
11,679
0
81
Originally posted by: Xavier434
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek

Oh come on now. Even though I don't agree with your choice I know you can come up with a better justification than comparing it to Jesus's crucifixion. Jesus was forced to be crucified by the will of others. No one is forcing you to remain a virgin until you get married. Even though Jesus may agree with your decision, he would also probably tell you that you are comparing apples and oranges with that example.

What it all boils down to is that you are choosing to practice the fraction of your religion which you actually have faith in while ignoring the rest just like everyone else who practices any kind of religion on this planet. It's all about faith. You have it when it comes to practicing abstinence until you are married. That is your only argument which cannot be countered properly and there is nothing wrong with that. I'm not posting here to tell you that you are wrong or to try and change your mind. I just want you to fully understand the risks you are taking and why. If you understand that and choose to do it anyways then that's fine.

Jesus was God first off. If he didn't want to be crucified he could have gotten himself out of there. One of the many perks of being almighty ;). This is the exact same thing for me (Less painful of course ;) ). I can choose at any time to disobey the commandment, but I don't. I love Jesus in the same way that Jesus loved each of us.

I challenge you to find a "fraction of my religion" in which I am ignoring. I'm not perfect, but I most definitely do not choose to ignore any aspect of my religion.

I'm not going to go back and forth with you trying to find some part of your religion which you do not agree with because that's pointless. There isn't a single justification that you or anyone else can come up in regards to their religion where an equally justifiable counter argument doesn't exist. Trust me man. I have debated the topic of religion for a long time. Once all of the details and the "why?" questions are fully answered it all boils down to one thing and one thing only. Faith. EVERYTHING you believe in regards to your religion revolves 100% around faith. Nothing else actually matters in terms of material used in a debate like this one.

We do not survive on faith alone. God doesn't give us all hard fact, nor does he call us to believe in something that isn't tangible around us. I would strongly encourage you, to read CS Lewis's "Mere Christianity".

It goes from a non-Christian perspective, and, in essence, systematically proves Christianity. Can be kind of dry, but it is an excellent read thus far for me.

As for the first part, all you need to know, then, is, that I embrace everything written in the Bible. EVERYTHING-- I fall short in my attempts to follow those goals, but I believe in them 100%.

-Kevin
 

Gamingphreek

Lifer
Mar 31, 2003
11,679
0
81
TruePaige-- I have come up with part of my answer so I can go ahead and post that.

You actually hit on one of the huge differences between Judaism and Christianity. If you are a Christian you therefore believe in the New Testament and its teachings.

If you turn to Acts 10:9-16

Since Jesus died, God pretty much nullified part of the meaning of a lot of the laws in Leviticus (Mold laws are.... lengthy to say the least :))

The literal meaning of the Leviticus verses is then nullified, but metaphorical meanings (God knows there are hundreds of them for any given verse) are still very much applicable.

I'm still reading on the other passages you brought up. I am actually not that good at citing scripture yet (I lead 2 Small Groups you think I would be good at this haha ;) ) so it takes me longer than average ;)

-Kevin
 

Xavier434

Lifer
Oct 14, 2002
10,373
1
0
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek

We do not survive on faith alone. God doesn't give us all hard fact, nor does he call us to believe in something that isn't tangible around us. I would strongly encourage you, to read CS Lewis's "Mere Christianity".

It goes from a non-Christian perspective, and, in essence, systematically proves Christianity. Can be kind of dry, but it is an excellent read thus far for me.

As for the first part, all you need to know, then, is, that I embrace everything written in the Bible. EVERYTHING-- I fall short in my attempts to follow those goals, but I believe in them 100%.

-Kevin

There is nothing which proves any religion. Nor is there anything which completely disproves any religion. They all require and revolve around faith. Without faith, the religion ceases to exist. I realize that many believers think otherwise, but the bottom line is that if it were true then we would all be following a single religion just like we all follow any other scientific formula without the need for faith. What many believers of any particular religion deem as proof is always full of theories which happen to fit the available facts. That does not constitute as actual proof. That is just evidence supporting a theory which has yet to be proven.