Originally posted by: moshquerade
yes, it is too young. if you let her have a belly ring at 13 she will be asking for nipple rings at 14.
Originally posted by: dug777
Personally, it's far too young i think.
I guess i'm a bit old fashioned, plus i think they look skanky as all hell...
OP: a belly button ring IS an ornament to attract the opposite sex, to wear it she will be wearing midriff baring tops...she's 13 for crying out loud.
EDIT: don't mind me tho, i'll raise my kids teh way i want, and Nebor (if he ever gets laid) will tart his girls up & encourage them to shag as many boys as possible (with birth control of course)...at 12...kids are having sex younger & younger these days *shakes head*
![]()
Originally posted by: Nebor
No, don't pay attention to the uber conservatives of ATOT. You'll go a lot further being the "cool" dad than the mean dad.
More important than a belly button ring is BIRTH CONTROL. In a year or two, you and your wife should start asking her every month if she wants to start on the pill. That's responsible parenting.
Originally posted by: Hyperblaze
And yes, Guys will always want to procreate. And a girl who dresses like a slut will arrouse the guys a hell of a lot more then a girl who dresses conservatively.
Originally posted by: Xonoahbin
Originally posted by: Hyperblaze
And yes, Guys will always want to procreate. And a girl who dresses like a slut will arrouse the guys a hell of a lot more then a girl who dresses conservatively.
Quite the opposite for me, actually. I am more attracted to a girl who doesn't dress like that, generally.
Originally posted by: dug777
Here's a suggestion for the crew led by Nebor, the 'give them birth control at 8 years old group', how about you take some real responsibility as a parent, and bring them up with a good code of moral values, some common sense, and decent sexual education? If that's too hard for you, then you don;t deserve to be a parent as far as i'm concerned. (Not that any of you will actually ever get laid, let alone have kids)
Putting them on birth control at increasingly younger ages is simply dodging your responsiblity as a parent, and of course it's going to encourage them to fsck around :roll:
Originally posted by: mugs
I'd let her do it. Telling her she can't have it will only make her want it more. Just don't let her dress like a skank ho.
Originally posted by: amicold
Originally posted by: Nebor
No, don't pay attention to the uber conservatives of ATOT. You'll go a lot further being the "cool" dad than the mean dad.
More important than a belly button ring is BIRTH CONTROL. In a year or two, you and your wife should start asking her every month if she wants to start on the pill. That's responsible parenting.
Eh, its debatable. Theres plenty of abstaining young women as well. Sex at 14/15 is pushing it. Especially 14, unless his daughters a skank, which I doubt.
Originally posted by: Citrix
This has turned into a interesting converstation. I had no idea a belly ring is a gateway piercing to nipple rings, dressing like a slut and being a whore. I guess i should back up and actually say that getting her ears pierced at 10 was the real gateway to damnation.
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: dug777
Here's a suggestion for the crew led by Nebor, the 'give them birth control at 8 years old group', how about you take some real responsibility as a parent, and bring them up with a good code of moral values, some common sense, and decent sexual education? If that's too hard for you, then you don;t deserve to be a parent as far as i'm concerned. (Not that any of you will actually ever get laid, let alone have kids)
Putting them on birth control at increasingly younger ages is simply dodging your responsiblity as a parent, and of course it's going to encourage them to fsck around :roll:
I would say that taking responsibility as a parent means preparing them for the real world, not the perfect virginal world you'd like them to live in. Kids have sex. Better that they do it with protection that without. It's just being pragmatic.
As far as a moral code is concerned, I don't feel that sex and morality are in any way related, except in situations where one party is harmed against their will.
As far as getting laid, I'm somewhere in the triple digits of male and female sex partners. Probably because daddy didn't hug me enough.
I'll never have kids though. I'm way too selfish, concieted and ego-centric. I would screw up a kid so bad, it's not even funny. That doesn't necessarily disqualify my advice on this particular set of issues though.
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: dug777
Here's a suggestion for the crew led by Nebor, the 'give them birth control at 8 years old group', how about you take some real responsibility as a parent, and bring them up with a good code of moral values, some common sense, and decent sexual education? If that's too hard for you, then you don;t deserve to be a parent as far as i'm concerned. (Not that any of you will actually ever get laid, let alone have kids)
Putting them on birth control at increasingly younger ages is simply dodging your responsiblity as a parent, and of course it's going to encourage them to fsck around :roll:
I would say that taking responsibility as a parent means preparing them for the real world, not the perfect virginal world you'd like them to live in. Kids have sex. Better that they do it with protection that without. It's just being pragmatic.
As far as a moral code is concerned, I don't feel that sex and morality are in any way related, except in situations where one party is harmed against their will.
As far as getting laid, I'm somewhere in the triple digits of male and female sex partners. Probably because daddy didn't hug me enough.
I'll never have kids though. I'm way too selfish, concieted and ego-centric. I would screw up a kid so bad, it's not even funny. That doesn't necessarily disqualify my advice on this particular set of issues though.
you have a responsibility as a parent to educate a child in such a way that they make intelligent decisions. fvcking like a rabbit at the age of 13, with or without any sort of birth control, is one of the most retarded ideas ever. i mean, cause this girl will definitely be "in love" and stay together with her supporting bf for all eternity, right?:disgust:
fact of the matter is that kids cannot handle sex. they may be physically mature, but they are in no way socially, mentally, or financially mature enough to engage in sexual activity. all they know is that they want to fvck, and they want to now. they totally ignore any sort of consequence, and that, quite frankly, is absolutely disastrous.
Originally posted by: Paddington
N***a is you crazy?![]()
Originally posted by: amicold
Originally posted by: Nebor
No, don't pay attention to the uber conservatives of ATOT. You'll go a lot further being the "cool" dad than the mean dad.
More important than a belly button ring is BIRTH CONTROL. In a year or two, you and your wife should start asking her every month if she wants to start on the pill. That's responsible parenting.
Eh, its debatable. Theres plenty of abstaining young women as well. Sex at 14/15 is pushing it. Especially 14, unless his daughters a skank, which I doubt.
