Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads

Page 86 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Tigerick

Senior member
Apr 1, 2022
851
802
106
Wildcat Lake (WCL) Preliminary Specs

Intel Wildcat Lake (WCL) is upcoming mobile SoC replacing ADL-N. WCL consists of 2 tiles: compute tile and PCD tile. It is true single die consists of CPU, GPU and NPU that is fabbed by 18-A process. Last time I checked, PCD tile is fabbed by TSMC N6 process. They are connected through UCIe, not D2D; a first from Intel. Expecting launching in Q2/Computex 2026. In case people don't remember AlderLake-N, I have created a table below to compare the detail specs of ADL-N and WCL. Just for fun, I am throwing LNL and upcoming Mediatek D9500 SoC.

Intel Alder Lake - NIntel Wildcat LakeIntel Lunar LakeMediatek D9500
Launch DateQ1-2023Q2-2026 ?Q3-2024Q3-2025
ModelIntel N300?Core Ultra 7 268VDimensity 9500 5G
Dies2221
NodeIntel 7 + ?Intel 18-A + TSMC N6TSMC N3B + N6TSMC N3P
CPU8 E-cores2 P-core + 4 LP E-cores4 P-core + 4 LP E-coresC1 1+3+4
Threads8688
Max Clock3.8 GHz?5 GHz
L3 Cache6 MB?12 MB
TDP7 WFanless ?17 WFanless
Memory64-bit LPDDR5-480064-bit LPDDR5-6800 ?128-bit LPDDR5X-853364-bit LPDDR5X-10667
Size16 GB?32 GB24 GB ?
Bandwidth~ 55 GB/s136 GB/s85.6 GB/s
GPUUHD GraphicsArc 140VG1 Ultra
EU / Xe32 EU2 Xe8 Xe12
Max Clock1.25 GHz2 GHz
NPUNA18 TOPS48 TOPS100 TOPS ?






PPT1.jpg
PPT2.jpg
PPT3.jpg



As Hot Chips 34 starting this week, Intel will unveil technical information of upcoming Meteor Lake (MTL) and Arrow Lake (ARL), new generation platform after Raptor Lake. Both MTL and ARL represent new direction which Intel will move to multiple chiplets and combine as one SoC platform.

MTL also represents new compute tile that based on Intel 4 process which is based on EUV lithography, a first from Intel. Intel expects to ship MTL mobile SoC in 2023.

ARL will come after MTL so Intel should be shipping it in 2024, that is what Intel roadmap is telling us. ARL compute tile will be manufactured by Intel 20A process, a first from Intel to use GAA transistors called RibbonFET.



LNL-MX.png
 

Attachments

  • PantherLake.png
    PantherLake.png
    283.5 KB · Views: 24,031
  • LNL.png
    LNL.png
    881.8 KB · Views: 25,525
  • INTEL-CORE-100-ULTRA-METEOR-LAKE-OFFCIAL-SLIDE-2.jpg
    INTEL-CORE-100-ULTRA-METEOR-LAKE-OFFCIAL-SLIDE-2.jpg
    181.4 KB · Views: 72,433
  • Clockspeed.png
    Clockspeed.png
    611.8 KB · Views: 72,319
Last edited:

Exist50

Platinum Member
Aug 18, 2016
2,452
3,106
136
Guess it means fewer side-channel vulnerabilities. Also less heat generation. And less cache contention. Why pretend to have virtual cores when you can have plentiful E-cores. Interesting move. Is AMD gonna do the same?
Heat, I don't think really factors in. SMT is a significant net improvement to throughput efficiency. But the E-cores are even better in that role, and there are the side channel considerations as you mention. At the end of the day, however, this is most likely a design tradeoff/compromise. It's certainly going to hurt Cinebench scores and such.

AMD will probably spend a lot of time debating this topic over the next couple of years. I think the big question is whether this signifies a permanent shift in Intel's strategy (including for server), or if it's only a temporary move for client-only LNC.
 

H433x0n

Golden Member
Mar 15, 2023
1,224
1,606
106
Lol

Man you have to keep up. Way too much faith in Intel as if they're throwing everything on their own processes.
I acknowledge that ARL-S has a high probability of being on N3. I genuinely didn't know that was the case with LNL as well. I can't find it anywhere on the internet either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpudLobby

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
22,915
12,988
136
Lulz. Zen 3 will have SMT4 despite all evidence to the contrary. AMD should release a "double 3600" cheaper than a 3800X. What a clown. Sad part is I don't think he was a troll.
Those were two different people actually but the point still stands.
 

hemedans

Senior member
Jan 31, 2015
277
156
116

Mtl igpu
I just wish intel wont Abandon i5 and i3 and gave them good igpu
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and Exist50

Kepler_L2

Golden Member
Sep 6, 2020
1,001
4,286
136
Heat, I don't think really factors in. SMT is a significant net improvement to throughput efficiency. But the E-cores are even better in that role, and there are the side channel considerations as you mention. At the end of the day, however, this is most likely a design tradeoff/compromise. It's certainly going to hurt Cinebench scores and such.

AMD will probably spend a lot of time debating this topic over the next couple of years. I think the big question is whether this signifies a permanent shift in Intel's strategy (including for server), or if it's only a temporary move for client-only LNC.
AMD will almost certainly go in the same direction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and Glo.

poke01

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2022
4,245
5,590
106
It's inherent to Lion Cove, for better or worse. ARL will have the same restrictions as Lunar Lake.
M1 doesn't have SMT either. Now I expect great results from Lunar Lake and Arrow.

Hyper threading doesn't make something automatically better.
 

mikk

Diamond Member
May 15, 2012
4,299
2,383
136
If there is no SMT on Lion Cove maybe they need a 8+32 config or how could they increase MT over RPL-R? With IPC improvements only?
 

poke01

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2022
4,245
5,590
106
I'm sorry bro
If you don't think Arrow and Lunar both based on TSMC 3nm with uarchs based on efficiency first design and with their big cores also focusing on high ST performance then I don't what to say.

Arrow lake will be bigger than Alder lake was for desktop and same with Lunar for Ultra thin laptops. This is Intel's first time using TSMC node for CPUs and their engineers can go all out without worries of node delays.
 

poke01

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2022
4,245
5,590
106
Wow, I feel somewhat vindicated after being drug pretty hard a few months back for proposing that Intel would do better to make their big cores all-in for single thread throughput at the expense of SMT...
Yeah I thought that. There is a reason why ARM cores forfeit SMT it's not needed when you have ecores and SMT also has other issues.

The M series and the upcoming Nuvia chips don't have SMT has well. Maybe LNC is the start but either way it's exciting to follow the CPU industry now
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and Glo.

adroc_thurston

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2023
7,182
9,959
106
If you don't think Arrow and Lunar both based on TSMC 3nm with uarchs based on efficiency first design and with their big cores also focusing on high ST performance then I don't what to say.
The reality is a bit different to that.
Arrow lake will be bigger than Alder lake was for desktop and same with Lunar for Ultra thin laptops
I wish it was but alas.
Lunar will be decent though.
it's not needed when you have ecores
Vulcan-derived designs had SMT and were very much ARMv8.
It's just a question of spending validation time for it.

Oh and Samsung M6 also had SMT planned in (for phones, no less).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and Exist50

poke01

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2022
4,245
5,590
106
Vulcan-derived designs had SMT and were very much ARMv8.
It's just a question of spending validation time for it.

Oh and Samsung M6 also had SMT planned in (for phones, no less).
lets look at great ARM SoCs like Apple's and Qualcomms. None of Apple designs had SMT.
I wish it was but alas.
Lunar will be decent though.
Arrow uses the same core design???
 

H433x0n

Golden Member
Mar 15, 2023
1,224
1,606
106
If you don't think Arrow and Lunar both based on TSMC 3nm with uarchs based on efficiency first design and with their big cores also focusing on high ST performance then I don't what to say.
Lunar Lake isn’t planned to be on N3, not at the moment at least. Arrow Lake seems likely to use N3 for desktop (unless something crazy happens), Lunar Lake is intended as a derisk product for 20A/18A.
 

Tigerick

Senior member
Apr 1, 2022
851
802
106
Ha, Golden Pig Upgrade @ Bilibili claimed that Intel 20A is gone missing....

Arrowlake.png


It seems like Arrowlake will be fully based on TSMC's N3 node, and if anybody still believe Lunar Lake will be based on 18A, come back next year :rolleyes:
 

ondma

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2018
3,310
1,697
136
No SMT on LNL makes sense coz it's an ultra low power core.

ARL lacking SMT doesn't seem plausible.
I agree. I would take this claim with a huge grain of salt. Only way this would make sense for ArL at all is if they did indeed produce an 8+32 configuration, and rumors are that configuration is cancelled or delayed.
 

uzzi38

Platinum Member
Oct 16, 2019
2,746
6,653
146
I've got very good reason to think ARL doesn't have SMT either, take that for what it's worth.

Although admittedly, for the longest time I did just think it was a typo.
 

Exist50

Platinum Member
Aug 18, 2016
2,452
3,106
136
Arrow uses the same core design???
Too vague for me to tell how much he/she knows, but @adroc_thurston is certainly right that LNL is by far the more interesting of the two.
Lunar Lake isn’t planned to be on N3, not at the moment at least.
Lunar Lake is and always was on N3.
Ha, Golden Pig Upgrade @ Bilibili claimed that Intel 20A is gone missing....
As far as I'm aware, this is not true, though it's possible I'm behind the curve. I'd take that claim with quite a bit of salt, however.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and mikk