nicalandia
Diamond Member
- Jan 10, 2019
- 3,331
- 5,282
- 136
The 8 channel 20 and 24 core versions are locked(can't be OC) so that's not very HEDTThere is a 3000 series that has the full 8 channels.
The 8 channel 20 and 24 core versions are locked(can't be OC) so that's not very HEDTThere is a 3000 series that has the full 8 channels.
Is being overclockable really a staple of HEDT?The 8 channel 20 and 24 core versions are locked(can't be OC) so that's not very HEDT
Those are Workstation-X, not the same as HEDT-X as Their past X299. Where they did not have the Word Xeon on them.. These are Unlocked Xeons(And just a few of them)So you post a picture listing four -X processors and post that -X is not going to happen in the same post? Please expand on what it is you are trying to say. Otherwise what you posted looks like gibberish. It seems like you are trying to add opinions as fact without stating your opinions.
It clearly was back on the days of X299 which is not that long ago(2017)Is being overclockable really a staple of HEDT?
Ah, so you are complaining about a marketing word. Gotcha. Silicon is silicon, the rest is marketing.Those are Workstation-X, not the same as HEDT-X as Their past X299. Where they did not have the Word Xeon on them.. These are Unlocked Xeons(And just a few of them)
I guess we will still wait for that Raptor Lake-X based on that monster 34C Monolithic die.
Is being overclockable really a staple of HEDT?
I thought that stability was the most important part of HEDT/workstation considering that these people use their systems for prosumer or professional work.It clearly was back on the days of X299 which is not that long ago(2017)
I believe they will release an obscure Mobile MTL in China.. As for Desktop parts? We may not see them until the end of 2024That means no Intel 4 desktop products next year, or possibly at all?
I'm really starting to think Intel 4 desktop products won't exist... at all.Nice to see Intel gradually beginning to compete. Having an alternative to Threadripper will be nice...IF the price is right. A bit dissapointing on the Raptor Lake refresh. That means no Intel 4 desktop products next year, or possibly at all?
Arrow Lake in 2024? That's a 2025 product.I'm really starting to think Intel 4 desktop products won't exist... at all.
With ARL desktop rumored to use TSMC 3nm, meaning a 2024 launch definitely is possible.
TSMC 3nm and Intel 4 products could co-exist to meet volume. Depends on whether Intel has enough TSMC 3nm wafer allocation.With ARL desktop rumored to use TSMC 3nm, meaning a 2024 launch definitely is possible, what's the point of releasing an Intel 4 desktop processor as well, with less cores and a worse architecture?
Desktop is rumored to use TSMC 3nm. 2024 launch is possible.Arrow Lake in 2024? That's a 2025 product.
Raptor Lake Refresh CPUs until then... Which is really not bad, because RTL is a pretty good CPU DesignDesktop is rumored to use TSMC 3nm. 2024 launch is possible.
Mobile 20A could be end of 2024. Manufacturing ready 1H 2024, ~1H to ramp, ~1H to full volume, launch end of 2024 and high availability 2025.
In case the folks around here need a reminder of what Intel's plans looked like just 1 year ago, here's their roadmap as described at Intel's Accelerated event in the summer of 2021. Intel 4 was supposed to ramp up in 2022 and deliver products in H1 2023. And that's the updated timeline, after they had already announced a ~12 month delay at the end 2020.That means no Intel 4 desktop products next year, or possibly at all?
Intel 4 is being used in other products than just Meteor Lake IIRC, horse creek falls.In case the folks around here need a reminder of what Intel's plans looked like just 1 year ago, here's their roadmap as described at Intel's Accelerated event in the summer of 2021. Intel 4 was supposed to ramp up in 2022 and deliver products in H1 2023. And that's the updated timeline, after they had already announced a ~12 month delay at the end 2020.
View attachment 72529
It feels like 2017 all over again, only this time at least they have better contingency plans both in terms of design and manufacturing. Looking forward to Intel 7+ in 2023.
It certainly could be a 2025 product, but Intel keeps saying 2024:Arrow Lake in 2024? That's a 2025 product.
Meteor Lake will ship in 2023, and Arrow Lake will follow in 2024.
Did you see the updated version that came out this week? Not much change, but 18A was moved forward from Q3 2025 to H2 2024. Yet, you needed to highlight a delay from years ago in your post?In case the folks around here need a reminder of what Intel's plans looked like just 1 year ago, here's their roadmap as described at Intel's Accelerated event in the summer of 2021. Intel 4 was supposed to ramp up in 2022 and deliver products in H1 2023. And that's the updated timeline, after they had already announced a ~12 month delay at the end 2020.
Yes, I did. Funny you should call it a "delay from years ago" when it was about their Intel 4 process.Yet, you needed to highlight a delay from years ago in your post?
Perhaps MTL is a Mobile Only CPU?Yes, I did. Funny you should call it a "delay from years ago" when it was about their Intel 4 process.
Anyway, my point was related to Intel's consumer desktop roadmap and their use of Intel 4 in their mix. If the node is in such good shape as you say, why are we getting a Raptor Lake refresh instead of a proper tick?
The question is how will they "refresh" RL. It is already pushed to the max in frequency and power consumption.Nice to see Intel gradually beginning to compete. Having an alternative to Threadripper will be nice...IF the price is right. A bit dissapointing on the Raptor Lake refresh. That means no Intel 4 desktop products next year, or possibly at all?
Obviously, there could be other reasons for delay than problems with the process. ML is a totally new (for Intel), product, so there could be problems with communication between the chiplets.Yes, I did. Funny you should call it a "delay from years ago" when it was about their Intel 4 process.
Anyway, my point was related to Intel's consumer desktop roadmap and their use of Intel 4 in their mix. If the node is in such good shape as you say, why are we getting a Raptor Lake refresh instead of a proper tick?