• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread

Page 557 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Timorous said:
Those gaming scores are interesting.

Questions though.

DDR4 or DDR5? JEDEC spec or tighter timings/higher speeds?

W11? Before or after the L3 cache issue with zen3 was fixed?

Tdp and tau settings? Intel Spec or motherboard spec?

I foresee a lot of variance in the results come review day. Anandtech who use JEDEC specs and Intel tdp/tau specs may show considerably worse results than HUB who will likely run above spec ram and allow the motherboard to dictate power and tau limits. GN who will likely run above spec ram but stick to Intel Spec power and tau limits will be an interesting middle ground.

On top of that W10 vs W11 testing, will reviewers stick to a single OS for reviews or will they choose the best performing for each platform?
Click to expand...


Also this:


https://twitter.com/x/status/1453195027128127490


E-cores disabled or enabled?
 
mikk said:
Also this:


https://twitter.com/x/status/1453195027128127490


E-cores disabled or enabled?
Click to expand...

Oh yea. So many configs to test to find the performance / price sweet spot.

If disabling e-cores does improve performance or maintain the same performance with lower power and temperatures it better be doable via windows because that could be a real pain otherwise.

I think for many the 12400 may be the best of the bunch because that is just 6 p-cores. I am also interested in seeing HUB do their cache performance scaling testing to see how much more cache helps the 12900k vs the lower tier models that have less L3.
 
Zucker2k said:
ADL-S pricing leaks?

i9 12900K - $589
i9 12900KF - $564
i7 12700K - $409
i7 12700KF - $384
i5 12600K - $289
i5 12600KF - $264

videocardz.com

Intel 12th Gen Core "Alder Lake-S" final specifications and pricing leak ahead of launch - VideoCardz.com

Intel Alder Lake will be more expensive than Rocket Lake We finally have the full specifications and pricing of the upcoming desktop series. Intel Core i9-12900K featuring 16 cores (8 Performance and 8 Efficient) and 24 threads will carry a boost clock up to 5.2 GHz, there is no Thermal...
videocardz.com videocardz.com
Click to expand...

I would have to dig through my post history (on mobile for the next few weeks, so I am not doing it now), but I believe Ii guessed $588, was I really only a dollar off? 🤣
 
Timorous said:
I think for many the 12400 may be the best of the bunch because that is just 6 p-cores. I am also interested in seeing HUB do their cache performance scaling testing to see how much more cache helps the 12900k vs the lower tier models that have less L3.
Click to expand...

The problem with cache "help" will be finding reliable information - in "stock" testing those 5-10MB extra will have outsized impact due to memory being very slow. While fully tuned DDR4 3733CL14 will lessen impact of L3.
Btw any news about memory tuning still being unlocked on non Z mbs ? If there ever was generation that benefits from faster memory, here it is.
 
JoeRambo said:
Yeah, Anandtech and JEDEC timings on DDR5 will destroy them. Large L3 and L2 can carry only so much when main memory is slower than mobile CPUs from fruit vendors.
Click to expand...

I would have to think they are comparing JEDEC 3200CL22 to JEDEC 4800CL40. If they used 4800CL36 (which is still JEDEC) it would only be 3% worse. 4800CL40 is 21%.

I personally would stick with DDR4 if you were considering buying 4800CL40.
 
Karnak said:
That gaming perfomance looks quiet... interesting for Intel's own benchmarks. Will probably be even worse in third party reviews.
Click to expand...

Well...

Intel did have a small one slide of comparisons against AMD in gaming with an RTX 3090, however they stated they were done without the latest L3 patch fix, and admitted that they would have preferred to show us full results.
Click to expand...


AnandTech Forums: Technology, Hardware, Software, and Deals

Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
www.anandtech.com www.anandtech.com


39-630.210e04f1.png



www.computerbase.de

Intel Alder Lake: i9-12900K, i7-12700K & i5-12600K vorgestellt

Mit einem großen Schritt eröffnet Intel Alder Lake die Hybrid-Ära. Core i9-12900K, i7-12700K & i5-12600K machen den Anfang. Ein Überblick.
www.computerbase.de www.computerbase.de
 
Pricing looks good but total platform costs are not, assuming mobos and DDR5 prices are elevated over last gen and DDR4. With DDR5 being expensive plus it's going to be gimped if you run 4 slots, who will want to use DDR5 for Alderlake?
 
I already sold some stuff to reduce the hit on my wallet. I got what i wanted from Newegg
12900k
Asus z690 Hero
Gskill ram(late november)
Oloy ram to hold me over until i get the Gksill ram
 
Another factor to mention is DRM. Intel has made statements to this, but there is an issue with Denuvo as it uses part of the CPU configuration to identify systems to stop piracy. Due to the hybrid nature, Denuvo might register starting on a different core (P vs E) as a new system, and eventually lock you out of the game either temporarily or permanently. Out of the top 200 games, around 20 are affected and Intel says it still has a couple more to fix. It’s working with Denuvo for a high-level fix from their side, and with developers to fix from their end as well. Intel says it’s a bit harder with older titles, especially when there’s no development going on, or the IP is far away from its original source. A solution to this would be to only launch those games on specific cores, but look out for more updates as time marches on.
Click to expand...
My Thread Dictator™ joke is slowly coming to life.

When a user is on the balanced power plan, Microsoft will move any software or window that is in focus (i.e. selected) onto the P-cores. Conversely, if you click away from one window to another, the thread for that first window will move to an E-core, and the new window now gets P-core priority. This makes perfect sense for the user that has a million windows and tabs open, and doesn’t want them taking immediate performance away.
Click to expand...
The way that this is described also means that if you use any software that’s fronted by a GUI, but spawns a background process to do the actual work, unless the background process gets focus (which it can never do in normal operation), then it will stay on the E-cores.

In my mind, this is a bad oversight. I was told that this is explicitly Microsoft’s choice on how to do things.
Click to expand...
Sounds like the first thing to do on ADL-S is to switch to Performance Plan. I'll be curious to see idle efficiency in this case.

EDIT: hopefully Ian got an incomplete description and the switch from P to E only happens when the focused program requires more P cores than available.
 
It won't be long, only a week from now. The forced PL1 at 240W is raising a lot of eyebrows... If GC needs to be blasted to above 5GHz in order to outperform Zen3, even in games, then it sounds like a very inefficient design. The part where the 3.3Ghz fixed clock parts showed 19% IPC increase indicates that GC has around 10-11% , on average, higher IPC than Zen3. The core structures are much larger than Zen3's so I wonder why are they getting only 10% more IPC out of such a wide machine? Sure, it can run at 5.2GHz clock, which Zen cannot do, but look at the power it takes, it's crazy stuff.

I do see ALD being great mobile chip, those E cores will do awesome in the lower clock/power domains. Desktop and server, on the other hand, looks abysmal.
 
Krteq said:
Those performance numbers - it's even worse than I expected

Igor Walosek was right, Intel had set PL1 (TDP) to 241W and they used unpatched Windows 11 build, so Ryzen was underperforming
Click to expand...

OTOH they did use high latency DDR5 (4400 CL36). According to Ian, Intel shipped 4800CL40 to reviewers which is just as bad. That could hurt gaming performance in some capacity.
 
jpiniero said:
OTOH they did use high latency DDR5 (4400 CL36). According to Ian, Intel shipped 4800CL40 to reviewers which is just as bad. That could hurt gaming performance in some capacity.
Click to expand...

Testing DDR5 4400 CL36 vs DDR4 3200 CL14 for Zen 3/RKL almost certainly does ALD no favors in most of those comparisons, DDR4 is probably the way to go for performance at this time for 12th gen.
 
Last edited:
inf64 said:
The part where the 3.3Ghz fixed clock parts showed 19% IPC increase indicates that GC has around 10-11% , on average, higher IPC than Zen3.
Click to expand...

In respect of CML they state 12% better IPC for RKL and 19% on top of this for ADL, that make 33% from CML to ADL, yet the same slide say that the latter comparison is 28%...

From the numbers it seems that the eight E cores use 20% of the total power, wich mean a little less than 50W, that make around 190W for the P cores, so the design is not that inefficient, it s just over overclocked, litteraly.
 
jpiniero said:
OTOH they did use high latency DDR5 (4400 CL36). According to Ian, Intel shipped 4800CL40 to reviewers which is just as bad. That could hurt gaming performance in some capacity.
Click to expand...
Well official specs are official specs. Which means 4800 for ADL on a MB with 2 slots and 4400 on a MB with 4 slots but only 2 RAM modules. Looks like the IMC in general is not that great.
 
Karnak said:
Well official specs are official specs. Which means 4800 for ADL on a MB with 2 slots and 4400 on a MB with 4 slots but only 2 RAM modules. Looks like the IMC in general is not that great.
Click to expand...

4800 CL36 is part of the JEDEC spec, which they could have used but it seems like most RAM manufacturers are opting for 4800 CL40.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top