I cannot believe i'm seeing this.

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

kevinthenerd

Platinum Member
Jun 27, 2002
2,908
0
76
Originally posted by: ElFenix
oh, and if euros didn't kill everyone who held any sort of belief every hundred years or so maybe you'd have religious people there too

Americans wouldn't have left. (Those who came here for profit came after the place was established. The only profit you would have had without colonies would have been from Indian gold or exotic crops or something.)
 

kevinthenerd

Platinum Member
Jun 27, 2002
2,908
0
76
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: DaiShan
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: Ryan
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: Ryan
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: Ryan
I've never met anyone who believed this crap. Nationality has nothing to do with this, blame this on Christians.

He's speaking to a full room, he's making videos, there must be some...

Again - what do that have to do with Americans? I'm sure there are some Christians in your country who believe in the same moronic ideas. I'm not denying that there are probably some people who believe this (probably a small amount - I've never met anyone who has).

Americans are the only ones that are this religious, look at many of Bush' voters.
People this rellious simply don't really exist in denmark, there's maybe 500 of them some place secluded.

Thanks for proving your bias against America. European elitism at it's best.

Yes, but he's actually correct. In a poll done last year Americans were found to be the most religious of any 'western' nation (including people living in and around Vatican City). We also have the highest percentage of fundamentalist christians (again, as per polls which are obviously prone to some error).

America is a pretty scary place to anyone with a brain.

Do you contend that one cannot be both a man of science and a man of God? Further, is it your position that the two are mutually exclusive?

Nope, didn't say that at all. I did, however, infer that literalist translations and fundamentalism are largely incompatible with rational thought. While all literalists and fundamentalists are (in theory) men of god, not all men of god are literalists and fundamentalists.

What's interesting to me is that I once wanted to join the Jesuits. They're probably the most logical reasoning-based order in the whole Catholic Church. Most of them have Ph.D.'s in some kind of science or engineering field, IN ADDITION to their doctorate degrees in theology.

So you gotta understand where I'm coming from... these crazy fundamentalists (like in the video) are so far out on the fringe, they practically don't even exist in my world. When I hear people calling these guys "Christians" and labelling all "Christians" with such behavior, I'm quite offended.
 

kevinthenerd

Platinum Member
Jun 27, 2002
2,908
0
76
Originally posted by: Malak
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: Malak
Honestly, I don't see why people bother arguing about this. Scientists talk out their ass and won't ever believe anything a religious person says so there's really no reason to bother arguing the subject.

But some people actually believe this crap.

52% of the U.S. believes this to be true.

At least 90% of the folks in P&N believe this to be true.

They helped get this taught in schools instead of science & history.

Imagine the U.S. 10 years from now with the current generation of kids now being taught this instead of history and science.

I don't know what schools you know of, but all the schools I went to lacked in the "teaching" part. The education system is in pieces, has been for a while. Science is just best guess so most of this isn't even worth teaching, let alone arguing. I put this in the genre of topics that should be left to the individual to explore, not to be force fed.

Education is crap, but churches are thriving, especially the ones where the preacher is paid to say what the people want to hear. This is why creationists will survive.
 

daniel49

Diamond Member
Jan 8, 2005
4,814
0
71
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: Linflas
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: Ryan
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: Ryan
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: Ryan
I've never met anyone who believed this crap. Nationality has nothing to do with this, blame this on Christians.

He's speaking to a full room, he's making videos, there must be some...

Again - what do that have to do with Americans? I'm sure there are some Christians in your country who believe in the same moronic ideas. I'm not denying that there are probably some people who believe this (probably a small amount - I've never met anyone who has).

Americans are the only ones that are this religious, look at many of Bush' voters.
People this rellious simply don't really exist in denmark, there's maybe 500 of them some place secluded.

Thanks for proving your bias against America. European elitism at it's best.

Yes, but he's actually correct. In a poll done last year Americans were found to be the most religious of any 'western' nation (including people living in and around Vatican City). We also have the highest percentage of fundamentalist christians (again, as per polls which are obviously prone to some error).

America is a pretty scary place to anyone with a brain.

:roll:
Welcome to the stupid statement hall of fame. Can we assume you will be removing your ever so enlightened brain from America so you wan't have to suffer with all us barbarians?

Dude, it's no secret that this religious people don't live in "modern" europe, as in france, germany, italy, and that.



your going for a high score in that hall of fame...lol modern europe....lets take france for instance its falling apart at the seams.
 

kevinthenerd

Platinum Member
Jun 27, 2002
2,908
0
76
Originally posted by: scottish144
My personal opinion of any religion is agnostic. I believe there may be a god, but if so he is unknowable and uninterperable. Think about it, if someone created the universe by either physics or magic, how the hell could we even hope to comprehend a being (or his word) as such? I remeber in elementry school I'd ask my dad (a college professor) for help on Math HW. He would try, but he simply couldn't descend to my level and explain it in terms I could understand. I believe this is the same situation with God IF (big if) he exists. I pray occasionally (for some reason or other), and I have gotton sparodic results, and weather those results are from the praying or not I cannot be sure.

The fact is that none of us know how our minds work. EX: Why do people get addicted to anything? I'm currently fighting an addiction to the computer. Right now I should be doing AP Physics HW. I know I should, lgically, but even so I am here. Why? I'm not getting a rush out of posting on ATOT by any means. Yet I am here posting. My mind tells my fingers to stop typing, but they keep typing until I metally force them to stop. And then I am filled with an urge to continue typing. (However, this is an improvement from when I would play PC Games for hours on end every day, I've only spent about 2 hours on the comp today).

My point is that none of us know every detail of why we make the decisions we do, why we feel emotions, why we do a lot of things. Until those questions are answered (and I believe it will be answered by Science) we cannot truley confirm if religion is real or not. Until then, I am keeping all doors open. I believe in possibility. I do not worship that possibility.

You see, the very reasons you pose an agnostic position are some of the very same reasons I pose a deist position. Faith and reasoning are interesting things.
 

thehstrybean

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 2004
5,727
1
0
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: thehstrybean
Listen, I watched Kent Hovind in my Astronomy class. I'm a Christian, and I don't believe most of what he said. He is a fundamentalist who doesn't reflect the views of 90% of Christians. Frankly, I'm tired of Christian bashing because people think it's stupid. As a Christian, I believe that God created everything. Dinosaurs and all. As a student of history, I believe that the Earth is young. The science and the Bible don't clash IMHO, and there are many who also see science and the Bible working hand in hand.

How does being a student of history qualify you to make claims about geology?

I'm a Christian too, but the earth is 4.5 billion years old, or thereabouts.

A literal interpretation of the Bible DOES conflict with science, but who does that? *crickets*

I'm not making claims about geology, only on the HISTORY of the earth. A literal interpretation (I assume you mean created in 6 24 hour days) does not conflict. I look at it more from a civilation standpoint.
 

Forsythe

Platinum Member
May 2, 2004
2,825
0
0
Originally posted by: shoRunner
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Doesn't matter if it's in the bible it's still stupid :p

so i think everyone knows that you don't like christianity (which of course only exists on the US) so whats the point of this thread?

2 things.
1: I didn't say it only existed in the US.
2: I wanted to start a conversation about this.
 

Forsythe

Platinum Member
May 2, 2004
2,825
0
0
Originally posted by: kevinthenerd
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: kevinthenerd
Originally posted by: Malak
Honestly, I don't see why people bother arguing about this. Scientists talk out their ass and won't ever believe anything a religious person says so there's really no reason to bother arguing the subject.

True. I find myself arguing, at different times and for different circumstances, both sides of this issue myself, and I've seen that nobody is willing to change their way of thinking. The logical poeple cling to science reasoning, and the emotional people cling to religious spirituality, but it's not right to say that logic or spirit should shadow eachother. My world view is based on a weird comingling of the two.

It's like people believing in santa claus.
Religion manifests itself like this in the US, but if the US was in the same situation as the Middle East, these would be the suicide bombers.

you can't be serious about the santa claus comment. if you are you're an ignorant fool, like most euros.

Ofcourse i am. Believing that a guy walked on water is the same as believing in Santa.
That's the way all religion is.
What's with the eu hate?

If I tell you that F=ma, do you verify it before believing it? Most don't. Science has this feeling of authoritativeness that people give it (and they shouldn't be doing that).

Religion is the same way. If I tell you you'll be a happier person if you strive to live a good life (avoiding sin as much as possible), I'm strongly asking you not to take my word for it. Give it an honest shot and see for yourself.

I have no doubt religious people are happier. But we all know ignorance is bliss.
 

Forsythe

Platinum Member
May 2, 2004
2,825
0
0
Originally posted by: Schfifty Five
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: Schfifty Five
Originally posted by: FallenHero
Originally posted by: Aharami
google video is blocked at work. anyone care to summarize the video?

Its a 2 hour video, I only watched the first 10 minutes...

Crazy dude talks about Dinosaurs and its relation to the bible. Claims Adam and Eve saw and named the dinos. Then claimed that there was a layer of water ABOVE the planet at one point. Thats pretty much where I stopped watching.

Well, regarding the water above the planet...it mentions it in the bible and if you believe, then you believe it, if you don't, you don't.

Taken from Genesis 1:6-8 (NIV)
6 And God said, "Let there be an expanse between the waters to separate water from water." 7 So God made the expanse and separated the water under the expanse from the water above it. And it was so. 8 God called the expanse "sky." And there was evening, and there was morning?the second day.

The reason we don't see that layer of water above the earth is b/c of the Flood during Noah's time.

From Genesis 7:11-12 (NIV)
11 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, on the seventeenth day of the second month?on that day all the springs of the great deep burst forth, and the floodgates of the heavens were opened. 12 And rain fell on the earth forty days and forty nights.

I believe that bolded part is referring to the water layer above the earth. The flood didn't only come from the water above as it mentions water springing from the deep, but it was indeed part of the flood.

Doesn't matter if it's in the bible it's still stupid :p

To some people, sure it is considered stupid. That is your opinion and it's perfectly valid.

However, please don't try to mask your narrowminded opinion with emoticons. Your attempt to try and play off your blantant trolling with a smiley icon isn't fooling anyone.

Why am i narrowminded for criticizing people that believe a book obviously written by several different persons, and contradicts itself several times, and is obviously fiction, is scientific fact, and truth?
 

Forsythe

Platinum Member
May 2, 2004
2,825
0
0
Originally posted by: kevinthenerd
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: Extelleron
This is the brainwashing of religion....... religion is a good concept but it creates a LOT of problems, one of which the complete ignorance of science and proven fact, rather they would argue believing every single word in the Bible.

I don't mind a african tribe living deep in the bush believing in god, that's acceptable, but to live with the knowledge we have today and still believe, is not acceptable.

I have a modern interpretation of God that says that God caused the Big Bang and wanted everything to come out the way it did. That does not disagree at all with science.

What makes our world so much better than the world 2000 years ago? We still have ignorant pricks killing eachother over philosophical differences. We still have murders in the streets. We still haven't figured out how to make people act reasonably. How can you deny the existence of a universal "right" and "wrong" in all of this?

Tha god created big bang isn't impossible, it doesn't conflict with science. It's just very very improbable that a man should be sitting up there controlling stuff.

Right and wrong is built in ourselves through evolution. Cultures evolved if they had a certain way of thinking, fairly simple.
 

Forsythe

Platinum Member
May 2, 2004
2,825
0
0
Originally posted by: thehstrybean
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: Malak
Honestly, I don't see why people bother arguing about this. Scientists talk out their ass and won't ever believe anything a religious person says so there's really no reason to bother arguing the subject.

But some people actually believe this crap.

Listen, I watched Kent Hovind in my Astronomy class. I'm a Christian, and I don't believe most of what he said. He is a fundamentalist who doesn't reflect the views of 90% of Christians. Frankly, I'm tired of Christian bashing because people think it's stupid. As a Christian, I believe that God created everything. Dinosaurs and all. As a student of history, I believe that the Earth is young. The science and the Bible don't clash IMHO, and there are many who also see science and the Bible working hand in hand.

The way i see it, moderate religious people not only do not adher to scientific methods, but they do not adher to their own book on which their religion is based. I still do appreciate them trying.
 

Forsythe

Platinum Member
May 2, 2004
2,825
0
0
Originally posted by: Pegun
Originally posted


Americans are the only ones that are this religious, look at many of Bush' voters.
People this rellious simply don't really exist in denmark, there's maybe 500 of them some place secluded.

First off lets stop with the mass quotes. Secondly, if there aren't people like this in other parts of the world, whos blowing themselves up with bombs so that we don't destroy their religious beliefs? (Hint: we're in a war with those who are doing it!)

hmm, yeah, i was inaccurate. I meant of that certain religious kind. And i'm mostly talking about them trying to overthrow the system in the modern world.
 

Forsythe

Platinum Member
May 2, 2004
2,825
0
0
Originally posted by: daniel49
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: Linflas
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: Ryan
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: Ryan
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: Ryan
I've never met anyone who believed this crap. Nationality has nothing to do with this, blame this on Christians.

He's speaking to a full room, he's making videos, there must be some...

Again - what do that have to do with Americans? I'm sure there are some Christians in your country who believe in the same moronic ideas. I'm not denying that there are probably some people who believe this (probably a small amount - I've never met anyone who has).

Americans are the only ones that are this religious, look at many of Bush' voters.
People this rellious simply don't really exist in denmark, there's maybe 500 of them some place secluded.

Thanks for proving your bias against America. European elitism at it's best.

Yes, but he's actually correct. In a poll done last year Americans were found to be the most religious of any 'western' nation (including people living in and around Vatican City). We also have the highest percentage of fundamentalist christians (again, as per polls which are obviously prone to some error).

America is a pretty scary place to anyone with a brain.

:roll:
Welcome to the stupid statement hall of fame. Can we assume you will be removing your ever so enlightened brain from America so you wan't have to suffer with all us barbarians?

Dude, it's no secret that this religious people don't live in "modern" europe, as in france, germany, italy, and that.



your going for a high score in that hall of fame...lol modern europe....lets take france for instance its falling apart at the seams.

There are several stupid things about that comment.
France is barely falling apart, it's a self correction that happens from time to time. French revolution etc.
Modern was in >"< because modern europe is the parts of europe that has developed systems that can by some be considered modern, systems where people don't suffer and , you know.
Was just a way to speak.
 

Forsythe

Platinum Member
May 2, 2004
2,825
0
0
Originally posted by: Martin
That the US is far more religious than any other western country is a fact and I can't understand why you people are getting to such idiotic lengths to deny this. I'll just list some things...
-church attendance is far greater than other western countries.
-the number / percentage of fundies is also much higher
-religion plays a HUGE part in yoru politics. A politician saying "god bless canada" is a rare, eyebrow-raising 'wtf?' event. In the US its impossible for anyone to end a speech with out it.
-there are a large number / percentage of bible literalists: there are museums, preachers, churches all dedicated to spreading the idea that the earth is 6000 y.o.
-first people tried to get creationism taught in schools, now they try to get ID taught alongside evolution.
-the stuff you see on prime time TV it europe would probably be off limits in late-night american TV. Anyone forget the whole "wardrobe malfunction" fiasco?

Are you people that ashamed of your country? When this topic comes up, poeple usually defend the US, rather than just deny the obvious.

This was my thought, but now i'm apparently a euro hater and such, which is simply not true imo. But, now i'm confused, are you correct you are they?
 

arcenite

Lifer
Dec 9, 2001
10,660
7
81
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: Martin
That the US is far more religious than any other western country is a fact and I can't understand why you people are getting to such idiotic lengths to deny this. I'll just list some things...
-church attendance is far greater than other western countries.
-the number / percentage of fundies is also much higher
-religion plays a HUGE part in yoru politics. A politician saying "god bless canada" is a rare, eyebrow-raising 'wtf?' event. In the US its impossible for anyone to end a speech with out it.
-there are a large number / percentage of bible literalists: there are museums, preachers, churches all dedicated to spreading the idea that the earth is 6000 y.o.
-first people tried to get creationism taught in schools, now they try to get ID taught alongside evolution.
-the stuff you see on prime time TV it europe would probably be off limits in late-night american TV. Anyone forget the whole "wardrobe malfunction" fiasco?

Are you people that ashamed of your country? When this topic comes up, poeple usually defend the US, rather than just deny the obvious.

This was my thought, but now i'm apparently a euro hater and such, which is simply not true imo. But, now i'm confused, are you correct you are they?


You people are a riot. Havn't we learned by now that just because a country is more religous than another, doesn't mean everyone in the country is religous? Personally I think religion is stupid, but that is not the point here. The point is that, as Ryan said, these people are all over the world, not just in the US.
 

Forsythe

Platinum Member
May 2, 2004
2,825
0
0
Originally posted by: arcenite
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: Martin
That the US is far more religious than any other western country is a fact and I can't understand why you people are getting to such idiotic lengths to deny this. I'll just list some things...
-church attendance is far greater than other western countries.
-the number / percentage of fundies is also much higher
-religion plays a HUGE part in yoru politics. A politician saying "god bless canada" is a rare, eyebrow-raising 'wtf?' event. In the US its impossible for anyone to end a speech with out it.
-there are a large number / percentage of bible literalists: there are museums, preachers, churches all dedicated to spreading the idea that the earth is 6000 y.o.
-first people tried to get creationism taught in schools, now they try to get ID taught alongside evolution.
-the stuff you see on prime time TV it europe would probably be off limits in late-night american TV. Anyone forget the whole "wardrobe malfunction" fiasco?

Are you people that ashamed of your country? When this topic comes up, poeple usually defend the US, rather than just deny the obvious.

This was my thought, but now i'm apparently a euro hater and such, which is simply not true imo. But, now i'm confused, are you correct you are they?


You people are a riot. Havn't we learned by now that just because a country is more religous than another, doesn't mean everyone in the country is religous? Personally I think religion is stupid, but that is not the point here. The point is that, as Ryan said, these people are all over the world, not just in the US.

Who said they werent?
 

sao123

Lifer
May 27, 2002
12,653
205
106
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: Schfifty Five
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: Schfifty Five
Originally posted by: FallenHero
Originally posted by: Aharami
google video is blocked at work. anyone care to summarize the video?

Its a 2 hour video, I only watched the first 10 minutes...

Crazy dude talks about Dinosaurs and its relation to the bible. Claims Adam and Eve saw and named the dinos. Then claimed that there was a layer of water ABOVE the planet at one point. Thats pretty much where I stopped watching.

Well, regarding the water above the planet...it mentions it in the bible and if you believe, then you believe it, if you don't, you don't.

Taken from Genesis 1:6-8 (NIV)
6 And God said, "Let there be an expanse between the waters to separate water from water." 7 So God made the expanse and separated the water under the expanse from the water above it. And it was so. 8 God called the expanse "sky." And there was evening, and there was morning?the second day.

The reason we don't see that layer of water above the earth is b/c of the Flood during Noah's time.

From Genesis 7:11-12 (NIV)
11 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, on the seventeenth day of the second month?on that day all the springs of the great deep burst forth, and the floodgates of the heavens were opened. 12 And rain fell on the earth forty days and forty nights.

I believe that bolded part is referring to the water layer above the earth. The flood didn't only come from the water above as it mentions water springing from the deep, but it was indeed part of the flood.

Doesn't matter if it's in the bible it's still stupid :p

To some people, sure it is considered stupid. That is your opinion and it's perfectly valid.

However, please don't try to mask your narrowminded opinion with emoticons. Your attempt to try and play off your blantant trolling with a smiley icon isn't fooling anyone.

Why am i narrowminded for criticizing people that believe a book obviously written by several different persons, and contradicts itself several times, and is obviously fiction, is scientific fact, and truth?


Ok its finally time to weigh in....
While the Bible was written for specific people by specific people... There is much useful that everyone can recieve from it. To call it fiction, now thats just an error. There is definate truth contained in its words.
The problem is the book speaks in metahpores... The truth must be revealed, but it is not always straight foreward or complete.
historically we know that Jesus of Nazerus was a real person. Historically, we have found ruins from specific towns, places, and events written about in the bible.

what you have to do is to seek out the truth from what is written... without giving non-sensical explainations.

Lets look at Genesis for just a minute...

In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
2 Now the earth was [a] formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.

3 And God said, "Let there be light," and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and He separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light "day," and the darkness he called "night." And there was evening, and there was morning?the first day.

6 And God said, "Let there be an expanse between the waters to separate water from water." 7 So God made the expanse and separated the water under the expanse from the water above it. And it was so. 8 God called the expanse "sky." And there was evening, and there was morning?the second day.

9 And God said, "Let the water under the sky be gathered to one place, and let dry ground appear." And it was so. 10 God called the dry ground "land," and the gathered waters he called "seas." And God saw that it was good.

What does it specifically say...
God Created the universe from nothing. Here the water and the face of the deep... are metaphors for the void empty universe... a blank canvas if you will, ready for creation.
What existed before the singularity we define as the big gang? Nothing.

What else does it say?
There is a specific order in which things were created... this order does not dispute what our theories say. (Universe, Sun, Earth, Moon, Plants, Animals, Man)

What does it not say? How long ago, or how long it took.
That a day is a 24 hour period... or a thousand years.
a 24 hour period made no sence for a day as the earth had not yet been formed.
A thousand years which comes from another verse in the bible 2 Peter 3:8...
With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day.
Another metaphor... not a God's day is 1000 years (hence 6 days = 6000 years, young earth theory = garbage) what it says is to God... time has no meaning. God is not restricted by time and space as we are.


I applaud anyone who actually attempts to uncover the various truths contained in the book... The events contained therein are true, but you must uncover what the information being conveyed to you is, what its purpose is and, how to apply it.... without taking a literalist point of view... and without trying to make it say things it doesnt...
and I extremely disagree with you if you just pass the whole thing off as worthless rubbish.
 

letdown427

Golden Member
Jan 3, 2006
1,594
1
0
Forsythe, just want to offer my congratulations for having such a good grasp of the English language. I'm utterly confident that your English is better than any of the other posters Danish (as opposed to DUTCH) and as a fellow EU ignoramus, just thought I'd offer morale support! :D
 

RightIsWrong

Diamond Member
Apr 29, 2005
5,649
0
0
I'm kind of curious about a couple of things:

1. If the "majority" of Christians are not fundies, why do they seem so quiet to the fundies being the most vocal representatives of their faith?

If I was in a group that had extremely vocal whack-jobs representing it, I would do one of two things, either leave the group and start my own or ask them to leave the group and to stop claiming that they are part of the group. Christians don't do this. They seem to embrace these nuts or excuse them by saying that they don't speak for all of them.

2. How does one get to call themselves a "Scientist" with credentials like this:

Hovind claims to possess a masters degree and a doctorate in education from Patriot University in Colorado. According to Hovind, his 250-page dissertation was on the topic of the dangers of teaching evolution in the public schools. Formerly affiliated with Hilltop Baptist Church in Colorado Springs, Colorado, Patriot University is accredited only by the American Accrediting Association of Theological Institutions, an accreditation mill that provides accreditation for a $100 charge. Patriot University has moved to Alamosa, Colorado and continues to offer correspondence courses for $15 to $32 per credit. The school's catalog contains course descriptions but no listing of the school's faculty or their credentials. Name It and Frame It lists Patriot University as a degree mill [3].

If only I could have had my degree for that price and in that amount of time.

3. How the hell would hire this idiot to teach physics as he claims he did in the video?
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: Janet Reno

The critical people here should debate him and then post the video.

If you can't stand the heat of another view on things, then get out of the kitchen.

Catch 22. You can't debate people who deny logic. His appeals are ones of ignorance and emotion purely. There is no debate there, just covering their eyes and ears and stomping their feet and demanding that truth is what they say it is.
 

thehstrybean

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 2004
5,727
1
0
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: thehstrybean
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: Malak
Honestly, I don't see why people bother arguing about this. Scientists talk out their ass and won't ever believe anything a religious person says so there's really no reason to bother arguing the subject.

But some people actually believe this crap.

Listen, I watched Kent Hovind in my Astronomy class. I'm a Christian, and I don't believe most of what he said. He is a fundamentalist who doesn't reflect the views of 90% of Christians. Frankly, I'm tired of Christian bashing because people think it's stupid. As a Christian, I believe that God created everything. Dinosaurs and all. As a student of history, I believe that the Earth is young. The science and the Bible don't clash IMHO, and there are many who also see science and the Bible working hand in hand.

The way i see it, moderate religious people not only do not adher to scientific methods, but they do not adher to their own book on which their religion is based. I still do appreciate them trying.

I'm not quite sure I get what your saying. Christians (moderate ones) don't adhere to science or the Bible?