Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: Schfifty Five
Originally posted by: Forsythe
Originally posted by: Schfifty Five
Originally posted by: FallenHero
Originally posted by: Aharami
google video is blocked at work. anyone care to summarize the video?
Its a 2 hour video, I only watched the first 10 minutes...
Crazy dude talks about Dinosaurs and its relation to the bible. Claims Adam and Eve saw and named the dinos. Then claimed that there was a layer of water ABOVE the planet at one point. Thats pretty much where I stopped watching.
Well, regarding the water above the planet...it mentions it in the bible and if you believe, then you believe it, if you don't, you don't.
Taken from Genesis 1:6-8 (NIV)
6 And God said, "Let there be an expanse between the waters to separate water from water." 7 So God made the expanse and separated the water under the expanse from the water above it. And it was so. 8 God called the expanse "sky." And there was evening, and there was morning?the second day.
The reason we don't see that layer of water above the earth is b/c of the Flood during Noah's time.
From Genesis 7:11-12 (NIV)
11 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, on the seventeenth day of the second month?on that day all the springs of the great deep burst forth, and the floodgates of the heavens were opened. 12 And rain fell on the earth forty days and forty nights.
I believe that bolded part is referring to the water layer above the earth. The flood didn't only come from the water above as it mentions water springing from the deep, but it was indeed part of the flood.
Doesn't matter if it's in the bible it's still stupid
To some people, sure it is considered stupid. That is your opinion and it's perfectly valid.
However, please don't try to mask your narrowminded opinion with emoticons. Your attempt to try and play off your blantant trolling with a smiley icon isn't fooling anyone.
Why am i narrowminded for criticizing people that believe a book obviously written by several different persons, and contradicts itself several times, and is obviously fiction, is scientific fact, and truth?
Ok its finally time to weigh in....
While the Bible was written for specific people by specific people... There is much useful that everyone can recieve from it. To call it fiction, now thats just an error. There is definate truth contained in its words.
The problem is the book speaks in metahpores... The truth must be revealed, but it is not always straight foreward or complete.
historically we know that Jesus of Nazerus was a real person. Historically, we have found ruins from specific towns, places, and events written about in the bible.
what you have to do is to seek out the truth from what is written... without giving non-sensical explainations.
Lets look at Genesis for just a minute...
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
2 Now the earth was [a] formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.
3 And God said, "Let there be light," and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and He separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light "day," and the darkness he called "night." And there was evening, and there was morning?the first day.
6 And God said, "Let there be an expanse between the waters to separate water from water." 7 So God made the expanse and separated the water under the expanse from the water above it. And it was so. 8 God called the expanse "sky." And there was evening, and there was morning?the second day.
9 And God said, "Let the water under the sky be gathered to one place, and let dry ground appear." And it was so. 10 God called the dry ground "land," and the gathered waters he called "seas." And God saw that it was good.
What does it specifically say...
God Created the universe from nothing. Here the water and the face of the deep... are metaphors for the void empty universe... a blank canvas if you will, ready for creation.
What existed before the singularity we define as the big gang? Nothing.
What else does it say?
There is a specific order in which things were created... this order does not dispute what our theories say. (Universe, Sun, Earth, Moon, Plants, Animals, Man)
What does it not say? How long ago, or how long it took.
That a day is a 24 hour period... or a thousand years.
a 24 hour period made no sence for a day as the earth had not yet been formed.
A thousand years which comes from another verse in the bible 2 Peter 3:8...
With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day.
Another metaphor... not a God's day is 1000 years (hence 6 days = 6000 years, young earth theory = garbage) what it says is to God... time has no meaning. God is not restricted by time and space as we are.
I applaud anyone who actually attempts to uncover the various truths contained in the book... The events contained therein are true, but you must uncover what the information being conveyed to you is, what its purpose is and, how to apply it.... without taking a literalist point of view... and without trying to make it say things it doesnt...
and I extremely disagree with you if you just pass the whole thing off as worthless rubbish.