HR 1 urgently needs to pass through filibuster

Page 20 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Roger Wilco

Diamond Member
Mar 20, 2017
4,866
7,300
136
This is an interesting thread about big tech funneling money to a GOP group that is actively trying to suppress votes.

"The primary goal of the RSLC is to elect Republicans to state legislatures and other state-level offices across the country. "


Facebook, Google, and ATT were among those who quietly donated.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: hal2kilo
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,406
136
This is an interesting thread about big tech funneling money to a GOP group that is actively trying to suppress votes.

"The primary goal of the RSLC is to elect Republicans to state legislatures and other state-level offices across the country. "


Facebook, Google, and ATT were among those who quietly donated.

Exactly, they will say they won't but they will either after some time or thru a 3rd party.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,616
48,178
136
They'll just move it to another red state like Texas with similar voting laws being passed.

Abbott already told the MLB he doesn't want any MLB events in Texas lol.

I wonder if Exxon comes out against voting restrictions if he'll cancel oil.
 

weblooker2021

Senior member
Jan 18, 2021
749
254
96
Fuck him. Seriously, the dems need to head over to WV and make his constituents put pressure on his regressive ass. By flip flopping, he's proven that he's just swinging his small dick given the power he's got now. What an asshole...
No other Democrat can win that state.
 

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,242
14,244
136
Fuck him. Seriously, the dems need to head over to WV and make his constituents put pressure on his regressive ass. By flip flopping, he's proven that he's just swinging his small dick given the power he's got now. What an asshole...

Yeah, pretty much. His talk of finding ways to compromise with the GOP are totally out of touch with reality, and he knows it. He was there for most of the GOP's constant obstruction during the Obama years. He well knows we aren't going to get any GOP votes for anything, let alone 10.
 

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,242
14,244
136
AFAIC there doesn't seem to be much difference if he does or does not win at this point.

There is some difference, in that we can use his 50th vote when we have a reconciliation bill, which we did once with the stimulus and will do again with infrastructure.

Where this is hurting us most is with HR1. We desperately need to get some version of it passed and he's totally dicking us over.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,222
55,760
136
AFAIC there doesn't seem to be much difference if he does or does not win at this point.
Do you think the COVID relief bill was worth having? What about confirmation of judges? And that's just 3 months in.

So I guess if you would prefer neither of those things to happen it makes no difference but millions of people would disagree.
 

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,242
14,244
136
Do you think the COVID relief bill was worth having? What about confirmation of judges? And that's just 3 months in.

So I guess if you would prefer neither of those things to happen it makes no difference but millions of people would disagree.

Yes, we do need him, which is frustrating, because he's being a total douche right now. What's with the flip flopping on weakening the filibuster?
 

thilanliyan

Lifer
Jun 21, 2005
12,077
2,280
126
Yes, we do need him, which is frustrating, because he's being a total douche right now. What's with the flip flopping on weakening the filibuster?
He's probably got McConnel in his ears. Maybe there's some committee position or something the Dems can give him...lol.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,406
136
He's probably got McConnel in his ears. Maybe there's some committee position or something the Dems can give him...lol.

Can’t even do that because an R would take his place.
I am sure they are saying tell us what big spending project do you want for your state?

I believe the earmarks thing is no longer in effect, which I think is a good thing. Never would have guessed I would say that but shit needs to be lubricated to pass when you are really backed up.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,222
55,760
136
He's probably got McConnel in his ears. Maybe there's some committee position or something the Dems can give him...lol.
Nah, McConnell has zero leverage over him. What could Mitch give him that would be better than what he has? The answer is clearly... nothing.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,222
55,760
136
Yes, we do need him, which is frustrating, because he's being a total douche right now. What's with the flip flopping on weakening the filibuster?
I don't know, I suspect this isn't the last we've heard about it though.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,610
33,330
136
Yes, we do need him, which is frustrating, because he's being a total douche right now. What's with the flip flopping on weakening the filibuster?
Do you think the COVID relief bill was worth having? What about confirmation of judges? And that's just 3 months in.

So I guess if you would prefer neither of those things to happen it makes no difference but millions of people would disagree.
Yeah guys, I used the word much instead of any deliberately.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,610
33,330
136
I don't know, I suspect this isn't the last we've heard about it though.
He needs to understand that if we don't enact these policies now he will not win his next election no matter how hard he panders to the middle. He barely eeked out his last win as it is. If we get some progressive policies in place this year, the benefits his constituents feel might be enough to overcome the outrage they're fed when they first pass. If he waits until 2023, the benefits will not have enough time to kick in before they throw him on the street, and that assumes the Dems can increase their power in 2022 without these policies, which is a stretch to begin with.