OILFIELDTRASH
Lifer
- May 13, 2009
- 12,333
- 612
- 126
Ps4 also is rumored to have "octoscreen". Supports up to 8 screens of awesomeness with resolutions up to 8k.
It's a black slide, with white, gray, and green features filling it in, and you think there might be bias? Quite the scandalous claim you have, there.PS3 equal in power to the Xbox 360? I sense more than a little bias in that article. If you have a graph with numbers on it, it's probably a good idea to make the numbers accurate.
Woah! Imagine the possibilities! 8-player Battlezone in 8k!Ps4 also is rumored to have "octoscreen". Supports up to 8 screens of awesomeness with resolutions up to 8k.
Anyone else hear they are delaying the next Xbox to update their (presumably) AMD APU architecture to match or be slightly superior to the already simular AMD APU hardware in the PS4. saw an article somewhere about that earlier.... let me see if i can find it.
A very big caveat here, you didn't specify IQ at all.Even @ 2560*1600 people try to enforce some AA.Also next gen console will target 1080P(up-scaled or not I'm not sure).
So you get your butt kicked with facts and then you become a little sook, how childish.You guys haven't heard of writing to metal? The efficiency is such that experiments are being conducted this moment at the top universities in the country to figure it out. Also talk of replacing supercomputers and such with racks of ps4's. A 200w power limit and being faster and more efficient than any other PC part currently available.
It would make sense, going by specs it's noticeably weaker than the PS4. Maybe they'll also change their mind about the always on DRM. D:
Also talk of replacing supercomputers and such with racks of ps4's. A 200w power limit and being faster and more efficient than any other PC part currently available.
no i included AA, I didn't include numbers for AA because its not as simple as raw throughput. AA helps make my point because it requires large amounts of bandwidth per pixel as well as increasing the workload for the ROPs.
Also why would next gen console Target 1080P, that's just a complete waste of bandwidth given your eye cant resolve down to that resolution at the distance you sit away from a TV ( assuming you don't have an 100 inch TV you sit a foot away from). Much better off with a lower resolution with higher IQ per pixel or higher frame rates then a higher resolution with lower IQ per pixel or lower frame rates.
So you get your butt kicked with facts and then you become a little sook, how childish.
I find article/hope piece like that BS, Nothing major is going to change in the silicon unless they delay the Xbox for 2-3 years. That would be Xbox 1 all over again. Upping clocks is a possibility but will also impact yields.
Except that it happened with the PS3. Mainly due to its cost per unit, and that simple number crunching was actually something it did really well. IBM's attempts to make expensive ones with RAS and good DP performance clearly weren't up to snuff, for the money (that, or internal squabbles killed it--we'll never know exactly, I don't think).I hope you're joking They said the same thing about the Cell processor in the PS3. How many times will you allow yourself to be fooled by hype before you realize you're being fooled by hype?
Not having to deal with PCI-e, and not having an ever-increasing framebuffer resolution. Your PC CPU will gain rough equivalency by raw power in a few years (use 80% of a core to do what might take 10% CPU+10% GPU on the PS4--but you've got 4-8 Haswell+2 gen cores at 4GHz, not Jaguar at 2GHz, so no biggie), and by special features (such as AVX2).Okay you got me with "facts". Please tell me in laymans terms how the "optimizations" on the ps4 will allow it to compete with a high end PC? Also exactly what in the ps4 hardware is eliminating "bottlenecks" that the computer supposedly has? And what exactly in the PC Is bottlenecking it from becoming the monster the ps4 is?
Except that it happened with the PS3. Mainly due to its cost per unit, and that simple number crunching was actually something it did really well. IBM's attempts to make expensive ones with RAS and good DP performance clearly weren't up to snuff, for the money (that, or internal squabbles killed it--we'll never know exactly, I don't think).
Keep in mind that point on the graph is between performance numbers of 100 and 1,000 the 'base of 1'. The PS3 may have been 10-30% faster (strictly for GPU) but the difference in spot on the graph would be VERY negligible.
It's a black slide, with white, gray, and green features filling it in, and you think there might be bias? Quite the scandalous claim you have, there.
Anyway, my take-away from the graph is that performance improvements are slowing down for GPUs, likely due to silicon being pushed closer and closer to the wall. A best-fit line up to the 8800 would have around 50% greater slope than one that includes Titan.
And it's a little disingenuous to compare the PS4 to Titan when the PS4 will cost you about $400 whereas a Titan-equipped computer will run you at least $1500.
nV got neither console, so the last thing I would expect from them would be unbiased observations or product comparisons.And it's a little disingenuous to compare the PS4 to Titan when the PS4 will cost you about $400 whereas a Titan-equipped computer will run you at least $1500.
Except that it happened with the PS3. Mainly due to its cost per unit, and that simple number crunching was actually something it did really well. IBM's attempts to make expensive ones with RAS and good DP performance clearly weren't up to snuff, for the money (that, or internal squabbles killed it--we'll never know exactly, I don't think).
By the time the PS4 comes out we'll be one year closer to the next jump, what makes people believe history won't repeat itself as it seems to do nearly every generation?
No doubt that Fujitsu isn't shaking in their shiny business shoes over it. It did actually get use as a supercomputer, though, even before the PS3s were more or less replaced by Teslas. The ME guys are still going at it with them, primarily for the cost. Everything but being used for supercomputers was hype that failed to materialize. At least give it some credit for succeeding a little, there, even if it only did so because Sony took a loss on the hardware.It was killed by the programming model. To put it frankly, the programmer time to get the performance out of it was not worth the cost in silicon it saved. Not even for ten-million-dollar supercomputers.
Ps4 also is rumored to have "octoscreen". Supports up to 8 screens of awesomeness with resolutions up to 8k.
One thing i like about PC over console...
Xbox game
Xbox 360 game
Xbox 720 game
Vs.
PS game
PS2 game
PS3 game
PS4 game
Vs.
PC game
One ever growing library.
I picked up original CD copies of the Secret of Monkey Island and the Curse of Monkey Island, yesterday./thread
played kings quest yesterday
played skyrim 5 minutes later