daniel1113
Diamond Member
Originally posted by: Gurck
And where might that button be? 😕
Sorry, if you can't figure out an online store with a huge "Buy now" button, there is no hope for you. This conversation is done. I'm off to dinner.
Originally posted by: Gurck
And where might that button be? 😕
You didn't say it was a buy now button, you said it was an add to basket button. I'm not your slave and am not about to spend more than a few seconds hunting through a link you provide to a shady retailer which won't even list its price. Way to slink away when beaten though 😉Originally posted by: daniel1113
Sorry, if you can't figure out an online store with a huge "Buy now" button, there is no hope for you. This conversation is done. I'm off to dinner.Originally posted by: Gurck
And where might that button be? 😕
You're right. It's only ok to call names if your opinion coincides with the majority's, how silly of me :roll:Originally posted by: SNM
Gurck, you may have been factual, but it doesn't change the fact that you're condescending and a jerk. Calling people "sheep" is a surefire way to make them ignore you.
Next time read, then post. I've gone over this more than once in this thread already since other ipod proponents have trouble reading as well (coincidence?)And while you've pointed out a good many things that audiophiles may care about, you're ignoring the fact that not everybody's an audiophile.
I do, this is why I don't have a 'favorite' player to suggest when asked; it depends on priorities. Notice how I didn't say a word about the Shuffle? This isn't an accident. I'm not interested in flash players and so don't research or comment on them. Actually, the only thing I've ever said concerning the Shuffle is that it might not be a bad deal for $100, as I've seen flash players which cost $200 and more. Putting words in peoples' mouths isn't going to win you any arguments either.Just accept the fact that some people have different criteria than you do in an mp3 player.
Seems like you really have your heart set on it *shrug*. You're already making excuses for the lack of features, sound quality & price. As I've said, people who claim not to have any interest in sound quality simply haven't heard a good setup. Would you want static & pops in your music? Fidelity at higher levels is no different; better sound is better sound.Originally posted by: Heen05
Damn, you went 6 pages arguing? Heh, thanks. Although i appreciate it, i really didnt understand or care for much of what was said. I am not an audiophile at all. And i stress that. Honestly, i dont even know what flossy or anything means. You are talking about all these specs i dont even care for, really. I pretty much just wanna listen to mp3s, thats all i really have. I dont even really have WMAs. It probably wont sound worse than my 100 (now, used to be 180 😀) buck flash iriver mp3 player. It holds more songs, and its really really easy to use (mini).
I would like it to record things, or have a radio like my current one, but honestly, i hardly ever use those functions. Would all this stuff you are talking about even apply to an audio retarded person? lol... 😀
Originally posted by: Heen05
ipods dont play wma!?
Originally posted by: mooncancook
I think it is elegant and beautiful. When they make one with better video (at least a decent DX9 chip with 128MB ram) and with optical out for DD/DTS signals, I would really like to get one to be used as HTPC along with a HDTV LCD for a HT setup. Right now it's not mature enough.
Originally posted by: Gurck
Aside from my opinion on its looks & my feelings on the statement it makes about you to others, all of my points (the majority of them) have been factual. Not opinions, not complaints. It does not play ogg or flac. It does have 0.42% THD as measured through the headphone jack. Etcetera... these are not opinions.Originally posted by: Sunner
Where di you provide any facts about anything?
You complained about the design, I agree, I don't like it, but that's just an oppinion.
You complained about the sound, most people won't care, it sounds ok as far as portable players go, most anyone won't care.
You complained about the price, products are worth as much as people will pay, if people would pay $10K for it, thats what it would be worth.
And so forth, everything so far has been your oppinion, and obviously many people disagree with you.
Threadcrapping is having a dissenting opinion? If you want a circle jerk where no one's allowed to disagree, make your own thread and state this explicitly in the original post (or post in P&N). Who said you crap in threads? I certainly didn't. I said you mindlessly insulted me for being mindless when my post was nothing of the sort.You're the one who threadcraps in every iPod thread, please point to the vast number of threads where I crap?
Your continued argument on this is baffling; the OP asked a question and I answered. Amazing that I have to deal with this crap because it wasn't the answer you wanted to hear. If you really liked Apple and their ipod you'd be able to tolerate people having differing opinions on it. Instead you seek safety in numbers and attack when you feel that's threatened. Like all fanboys.Originally posted by: Sunner
No, to me it turns to threadcrapping when you post in damn near every thread discussing iPod's just to say they suck, regardless of the reason for this suckage.
I'm no big fan of Windows, but you don't see me posting in every Windows thread about how it sucks.
If anything, I'll offer advice where I can.
Originally posted by: Gurck
Your continued argument on this is baffling; the OP asked a question and I answered. Amazing that I have to deal with this crap because it wasn't the answer you wanted to hear. If you really liked Apple and their ipod you'd be able to tolerate people having differing opinions on it. Instead you seek safety in numbers and attack when you feel that's threatened. Like all fanboys.Originally posted by: Sunner
No, to me it turns to threadcrapping when you post in damn near every thread discussing iPod's just to say they suck, regardless of the reason for this suckage.
I'm no big fan of Windows, but you don't see me posting in every Windows thread about how it sucks.
If anything, I'll offer advice where I can.
You, on the other hand, posted for no reason other than to insult - and in as hypocritical a manner as possible.
And threw a baseless, petty insult at me for not agreeingOriginally posted by: Sunner
Righty, I'm a fanboy, despite the fact that I haven't owned an Apple product in years :roll:
I merely stated that I think they make good, if overpriced, products, more specifically the Powermacs and Powerbooks.
You must not read very well then. While ipod fans often post only to say "it's good" in some wannabe catchy, trendy way like comparing it to a BMW (speaking of which, why aren't you calling them on being mindless?), I always state why I feel the way I do; anything less would reflect as poorly on my intellect as it does on theirs.My reply wasn't based on what you said in this thread, here your reply did make sense, my reply was based on the fact that I see you coming into loads of iPod threads only to say how much it sucks.