Look, a lot can happen between now and then. If elections were held today I'd guess that Republicans would lose 20 seats minimum.What are the odds that Democrats take The House back in 2024?
wow Johnson was pretty low on the Repub totem pole.also, i am shocked by this event. he got it on the 1st vote?
wtfbbq??
Why did R's fall in line for him?
wow Johnson was pretty low on the Repub totem pole.
Ok, From what I've read, Johnson was the "least offensible" candidate for House Republicans.
But who or what corraled all the wacko Repubs to vote for him on the first round?
Unanimous vote should have been near impossible, like herding cats.
I'd like to agree with you but frankly I don't see the US Supreme Court ever issuing any decision actually reducing gerrymandering any time in the foreseeable future. The Supreme Court issued one of it's worst, most anti-democratic decisions ever in 2019 (Rucho v. Common Cause) were they ruled that no federal court may ever consider any lawsuit contesting partisan gerrymandering, holding that issue is up to state legislatures and state governments.Look, a lot can happen between now and then. If elections were held today I'd guess that Republicans would lose 20 seats minimum.
That doesn't matter though. A bunch of gerrymandering cases are still winding through the court system. Depending how those shake out Dems could gain more seats, or maybe even lose some. If the economy goes in the shitter for reasons other than government shutdown, voters are going to blame Biden whether or not he or Dems have anything to do with it.
Speculating this far out is futile.
Republicans knew they needed to elect someone. Freedumb caucus wasn't going to vote for non-maga. Rank-and-file needed a relatively unknown maga and got it with Johnson.wow Johnson was pretty low on the Repub totem pole.
Ok, From what I've read, Johnson was the "least offensible" candidate for House Republicans.
But who or what corraled all the wacko Repubs to vote for him on the first round?
Unanimous vote should have been near impossible, like herding cats.
'Bama says Howdeeee.I'd like to agree with you but frankly I don't see the US Supreme Court ever issuing any decision actually reducing gerrymandering any time in the foreseeable future. The Supreme Court issued one of it's worst, most anti-democratic decisions ever in 2019 (Rucho v. Common Cause) were they ruled that no federal court may ever consider any lawsuit contesting partisan gerrymandering, holding that issue is up to state legislatures and state governments.
Republicans knew they needed to elect someone. Freedumb caucus wasn't going to vote for non-maga. Rank-and-file needed a relatively unknown maga and got it with Johnson.
It was never that "less crazy" (lol) Republicans don't want maga, it's that they want to play the line like they're reasonably moderate because they can't win with only maga. They all know Johnson is hardcore maga, but they also knew from the lack of immediate backlash like what happened with Jordan that the general public wasn't fully aware that he is maga. Johnson allowed them to vote their maga heart while maintaining plausible (lol like they don't know exactly what he is) deniability as the public becomes more aware.
Why would anyone think that MAGA Mike is going to be anything but lead lunatic at the head of the insane asylum? I don't think anyone is delusional enough to think that Republicans would want to govern in good faith. People might say stuff about wanting to work together, but remember that the American public is not very plugged in and can be quite dense, and thus still think that bipartisanship is something to be valued.If you think he's going to be reasonable.. you're gonna be dissappointed.
![]()
‘Get Ready For It’: Political Strategist Issues Dire Prediction About Mike Johnson
The new House speaker is “every bit the flamethrower” as Jim Jordan but “just wears a pair of glasses and dons a Clark Kent disguise,” warned Chai Komanduri.www.huffpost.com
“Get ready for it. We’ll have a government shutdown,” he predicted. “We’re going to shut down aid to Ukraine to help Trump’s major benefactor, [Russian President] Vladimir Putin. That’s what’s going to occur.”
Johnson is “every bit the flamethrower” as Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), who lost his bid to become speaker despite being endorsed by Trump.
Johnson “just wears a pair of glasses and dons a Clark Kent disguise,” Komanduri added.
MAGA speaker, means more MAGA candidates running for elections.
We should be letting MAGA sing MAGA tropes with their megaphones and let Gen Z reply at the ballot box.
If we learned anything from 2018, 2020 and 2022.. extreme MAGA candidates aren't popular.
Yet MAGA is now speaker of the house.
Eventually more and more will get in.
Grass isn't always greener on the other side, re: booting Kevin McCarthy.
I don't think this will really encourage MAGA candidates. For one, this guy is probably going to be weaker than even McCarthy. He's a throwaway speaker just to fill the seat, IMHO.MAGA speaker, means more MAGA candidates running for elections.
We should be letting MAGA sing MAGA tropes with their megaphones and let Gen Z reply at the ballot box.
If we learned anything from 2018, 2020 and 2022.. extreme MAGA candidates aren't popular.
Yeah I'm not sure if people realize that McCarthy was just doing whatever the far right wanted anyway. I see no functional difference here other than this guy is going to be an endless series of bad press for Republicans.but who booted Keven McCarthy?
Then why did Repubs vote McCarthy out?Yet MAGA is now speaker of the house.
Eventually more and more will get in.
Grass isn't always greener on the other side, re: booting Kevin McCarthy.
You mean like ......Yeah I'm not sure if people realize that McCarthy was just doing whatever the far right wanted anyway. I see no functional difference here other than this guy is going to be an endless series of bad press for Republicans.
Yet MAGA is now speaker of the house.
Eventually more and more will get in.
Grass isn't always greener on the other side, re: booting Kevin McCarthy.
So nothing changed. McCarthy is every bit as whack as the rest of the wonderland gang.Yet MAGA is now speaker of the house.
I'm incredulous to this idea floating around that McCarthy wasn't some MAGA clown who just so happened to always be playing footsy with the far right and shining Trump's shoes with his tongue.Yeah I'm not sure if people realize that McCarthy was just doing whatever the far right wanted anyway. I see no functional difference here other than this guy is going to be an endless series of bad press for Republicans.
The funny thing is that it is entirely up to the House how they construct appropriations bills. The 12 bills thing reflects the historic power of specific committee chairs, nothing more. My guess is that we'll have a short shutdown or three followed by a year long CR. If they were smart about it, they'd use the long CR to kick the can into the next fiscal year and past the 2024 election. Fiscal years are a creation of Congress and Congress can ignore the idea if it wants to.Just the notion of the proposed "12 separate individually focused funding bills" is enough to almost guarantee a shutdown.
The added amount of time that plan will take all but seals it.
But Gaetz is right and each bill should be handled separately instead of bundling them all together.Just the notion of the proposed "12 separate individually focused funding bills" is enough to almost guarantee a shutdown.
The added amount of time that plan will take all but seals it.
Broken clock and whatnot. Gaetz is still a fuckhead.But Gaetz is right and each bill should be handled separately instead of bundling them all together.