Hollocaust

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Analog

Lifer
Jan 7, 2002
12,755
3
0
Originally posted by: The Godfather
How come everyone says the Jewish Hollocaust is so terrible and the whole world is familiar with it. (It was really terrible)

But no one hardly ever mentiones the Armenian Hollocaust by the Turks. Which was the most massive killings and slaughters the world has ever seen to this day.

Why?


Because the Armenians are a much smaller minority in the world, and their ethnicity is based on a language, not a religion. Heck, they didn't even get their own country till a few years ago again.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,584
985
126
Originally posted by: AznAnarchy99
Originally posted by: mdchesne
Originally posted by: AznAnarchy99
Native American genocide but no one talks about that since we succeeded. Hitler praised how we eliminated a "inferior" people.

wrong. the difference is because we didn't put them into camps and starve them to death. we put them on reservations, but most of them died fighting off the army in savage battles such as Little Bighorn and Wounded Knee. It was far less brutal than what happened in German and Austria.

so riding westward forcing them off their land and killing those who didnt obey wasnt bad?

Well, we didn't know any better then. Hitler fvcking should have fvcking known better.
 

envy me

Golden Member
Nov 5, 2005
1,000
0
0
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: envy me

Just a question so please don't flame me but didn't the Russians die by mainly Jewish hands at that time?

What? No. What makes you think that?


I read somewhere, can't remember where but there was a massacre in Russia, that was carried out by Jewish fanatics.. I can't recall where I read this but can someone clarify if something like this ever happened? I read it just can't remember where.

 

mdchesne

Banned
Feb 27, 2005
2,810
1
0
Originally posted by: envy me
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: envy me

Just a question so please don't flame me but didn't the Russians die by mainly Jewish hands at that time?

What? No. What makes you think that?


I read somewhere, can't remember where but there was a massacre in Russia, that was carried out by Jewish fanatics.. I can't recall where I read this but can someone clarify if something like this ever happened? I read it just can't remember where.

let the flaming begin:

you read it from the National Inquirer no doubt
 

AznAnarchy99

Lifer
Dec 6, 2004
14,695
117
106
Originally posted by: Strk
The mechanization of it and that it was one of the primary motivations for the most destructive war ever plays a big part. It was also one of the largest cases of genocide and to go back to it, the mechanization really separates from your typical massacre/death march style genocide.

As for the Armenian genocide, you have a pretty big issue with Turkey refusing to admit it happened, which is also a problem since they don't want other countries to acknowledge it either. That is not saying others don't, but Turkey would prefer that they didn't.

No real need to mechanization for genocide to kill alot of people. Rwanda with its machetes and guns did alot of damage in a short time. No one really knew about Rwanda until the movie.

Dont forget about the killing fields of Cambodia. There are alot of acts of genocides that people arent aware of.
 

ThePresence

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
27,727
16
81
Originally posted by: envy me
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: envy me

Just a question so please don't flame me but didn't the Russians die by mainly Jewish hands at that time?

What? No. What makes you think that?


I read somewhere, can't remember where but there was a massacre in Russia, that was carried out by Jewish fanatics.. I can't recall where I read this but can someone clarify if something like this ever happened? I read it just can't remember where.

You might be thinking of Babi Yar (google it), but that was the other way around. Nazis massacred around 35,000 Jews in that spot in Russia.
 

AznAnarchy99

Lifer
Dec 6, 2004
14,695
117
106
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: AznAnarchy99
Originally posted by: mdchesne
Originally posted by: AznAnarchy99
Native American genocide but no one talks about that since we succeeded. Hitler praised how we eliminated a "inferior" people.

wrong. the difference is because we didn't put them into camps and starve them to death. we put them on reservations, but most of them died fighting off the army in savage battles such as Little Bighorn and Wounded Knee. It was far less brutal than what happened in German and Austria.

so riding westward forcing them off their land and killing those who didnt obey wasnt bad?

Well, we didn't know any better then. Hitler fvcking should have fvcking known better.

dude what kind of argument is that? Know better about what? Its still killing human beings. So genocide was determined bad after about half a century after we killed off a people? We didnt want the Natives on "our" land and we forced them out. We didnt like them and we thought they were "inferior". Its the same thing, Hitler thought the Jewish people were "inferior" and attempted to get rid of them.

 

zoiks

Lifer
Jan 13, 2000
11,787
3
81
Originally posted by: yellowfiero
Originally posted by: The Godfather
How come everyone says the Jewish Hollocaust is so terrible and the whole world is familiar with it. (It was really terrible)

But no one hardly ever mentiones the Armenian Hollocaust by the Turks. Which was the most massive killings and slaughters the world has ever seen to this day.

Why?


Because the Armenians are a much smaller minority in the world, and their ethnicity is based on a language, not a religion. Heck, they didn't even get their own country till a few years ago again.

Yep. Their lives are insignificant. :roll:
 

envy me

Golden Member
Nov 5, 2005
1,000
0
0
Well it was probably false then.. Regardless... Many terrible things happened in the past. But we cannot let one incident take precident over another, if you disagree with that than answer this question:

If you HAD to make a choice, would you rather have 10 million strangers killed in gas chambers, or only your immediate family killed?


murder is murder. It shouldn't matter how many people died it is still unacceptable. People lost loved ones. The world learned of the tragedy and will not allow it to happen again. But please don't focus on only one aspect, everybody who died had a family and people who loved them.

 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
because of the systematic and cruel way the germans went about it. they set the bar to a whole new level. plus they supposedly had reached the highest level of civilization/culture of their time, and yet they stooped to this. against their neighbors..their countrymen.


Because the Armenians are a much smaller minority in the world, and their ethnicity is based on a language, not a religion. Heck, they didn't even get their own country till a few years ago again.

i think the armenians are christian, the turks are mostly muslim. course one must remember hitler was inspired by the work of the turks, it was an example of how he could get away with his plan. the turks deny it to this day.
 

Iron Woode

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 10, 1999
31,304
12,820
136
Originally posted by: The Godfather
How come everyone says the Jewish Hollocaust is so terrible and the whole world is familiar with it. (It was really terrible)

But no one hardly ever mentiones the Armenian Hollocaust by the Turks. Which was the most massive killings and slaughters the world has ever seen to this day.

Why?
No one mentions Stalin's hollocaust either and 21 million died.
 

envy me

Golden Member
Nov 5, 2005
1,000
0
0
Originally posted by: AznAnarchy99
Originally posted by: Strk
The mechanization of it and that it was one of the primary motivations for the most destructive war ever plays a big part. It was also one of the largest cases of genocide and to go back to it, the mechanization really separates from your typical massacre/death march style genocide.

As for the Armenian genocide, you have a pretty big issue with Turkey refusing to admit it happened, which is also a problem since they don't want other countries to acknowledge it either. That is not saying others don't, but Turkey would prefer that they didn't.

No real need to mechanization for genocide to kill alot of people. Rwanda with its machetes and guns did alot of damage in a short time. No one really knew about Rwanda until the movie.

Dont forget about the killing fields of Cambodia. There are alot of acts of genocides that people arent aware of.


I watched the movie that depicts those events and found it very disturbing (Killing Fields). I do not know enough about the situation to make any comment though.

 

yankeesfan

Diamond Member
Aug 6, 2004
5,922
1
71
Originally posted by: envy me
Originally posted by: AznAnarchy99
Originally posted by: Strk
The mechanization of it and that it was one of the primary motivations for the most destructive war ever plays a big part. It was also one of the largest cases of genocide and to go back to it, the mechanization really separates from your typical massacre/death march style genocide.

As for the Armenian genocide, you have a pretty big issue with Turkey refusing to admit it happened, which is also a problem since they don't want other countries to acknowledge it either. That is not saying others don't, but Turkey would prefer that they didn't.

No real need to mechanization for genocide to kill alot of people. Rwanda with its machetes and guns did alot of damage in a short time. No one really knew about Rwanda until the movie.

Dont forget about the killing fields of Cambodia. There are alot of acts of genocides that people arent aware of.


I watched the movie that depicts those events and found it very disturbing (Killing Fields). I do not know enough about the situation to make any comment though.

The media covers up communist purges. *shifty eyes*
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: AznAnarchy99
Originally posted by: Strk
The mechanization of it and that it was one of the primary motivations for the most destructive war ever plays a big part. It was also one of the largest cases of genocide and to go back to it, the mechanization really separates from your typical massacre/death march style genocide.

As for the Armenian genocide, you have a pretty big issue with Turkey refusing to admit it happened, which is also a problem since they don't want other countries to acknowledge it either. That is not saying others don't, but Turkey would prefer that they didn't.

No real need to mechanization for genocide to kill alot of people. Rwanda with its machetes and guns did alot of damage in a short time. No one really knew about Rwanda until the movie.

Dont forget about the killing fields of Cambodia. There are alot of acts of genocides that people arent aware of.

I know, that's why I mentioned the mechanization :)

In most cases of genocide, they just go out and kill people. Other times, they'll force them to march long distances, which will kill large amounts of them, then kill the ones who survive. In the case of the Armenians, the Turks not only did that, but released prisoners to help with the slaugther.

Yet the Nazis had an entire infrastructure built in order to eradicate millions of peope. It really sets it apart from the others because of that.

And to the person who said all that makes Armenians different is a language, you are extraordinarily wrong. They are an ancient and very rich culture. They are also known as the first Christian nation.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
http://pekingduck.org/archives/000987.php
Why do you say the Holocaust was unique?

That's what a commenter asked me a few minutes ago, even after I said I didn't want to address this subject. Well, too late now. After I wrote my reply, I decided it was worthy of its own post:

Genocide has been here forever and it will probably never go away. Turks and Armenians, Serbs and Croatians, Pol Pot and the Cambodians, Chiang Kai Shek and the Communists, Stalin and Lenin and Mao against the aristocracy and bourgeoisie. In terms of numbers, Stalin may have murdered more than Hitler did, and Mao just may top them all. So why does the Holocaust stand apart?

The Germans were a people that had attained an unmatched level of civilization -- lliterate, educated, sophisticated and artistic. They had brought the world some of the very greatest geniuses, Bach and Mozart and Kant and Nietzsche and Goethe and Heine, to name just a few. That this most-refined society then descended to the point where barbarism was licensed and actively encouraged is one of the great anomalies of history, and new books come out every year as to why Nazism was able to take root and thrive.

The Nazis inflicted this barbarism against the people of Eastern Europe in a way that is literally unimaginable. This in itself is extraordinary enough considering Germany's great culture. But then, just when we know they couldn't get any more monstrous, they bring us The Holocaust.

Here was something that no one could have envisaged because it was simply beyond the scope of human capabilities. An advanced society, technologically adept and renowned for its efficiency and force of will, actually turns this knowledge and skill and determination to a cause so profoundly evil, so totally bad that even today, 60 years later, we try to grapple with it, usually without success. For the first time in man's history, modern assembly-line efficiencies and state-of-the-art technologies were implemented for the primary purpose of exterminating an entire race of people. The sheer level of collaboration and organization is staggering. And it showed us "sophisticated Westerners" just how thin our veneer of civilization really can be.

At least when Stalin and Lenin ordered the mass shootings after the glorious revolution they believed (deludedly and insanely) that they were shooting active, threatening enemies. In the case of the Jews, the Nazis butchered babies, children, mothers, husbands, grandparents, teens -- people who had posed literally no threat, who had done nothing aside from exist. Yet their mere existence was cause enough to invest billions of dollars into the gulag of death camps that would commoditize the mass murder of innocents.

There are many other aspects of the Holocaust that set it apart, like the wanton cruelty of doctors educated in the world's finest universities. (And when I say cruelty, I mean really, really cruel.) Man's inhumanity to man is an old story. But never did we see it displayed like this in the modern age and in the Western world, which had supposedly been reshaped by the Enlightenment into a more tolerant and rational society. It was a grotesque hiccup of history, as though in an instant an entire modern society dropped through a time warp into the dark ages.

There is a reason why the Holocaust has the mystique it does, why it is so disturbing. Unfortunately, "the Holocaust industry" has exploited it, created several myths and in some cases exaggerated its history. But that doesn't take away from what actually happened. Genocide was a thing of the past in Europe. It was from a darker, more violent age. And then the unthinkable happened, and we were forced to face the fact that there is a dark side to man, no matter how civilized or educated he may be.

It's a subject I can go on and on about. Studying the Holocaust offers infinite insights into all aspects of man, from the most base to the most noble, and it will always stand apart as one of the great aberrations in man's history, and one that must never be forgotten. Men were capable of doing it then, and we can repeat it at any time if we fail to remain vigilant against intolerance, hatred and tyranny.
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: yankeesfan
Originally posted by: envy me
Originally posted by: AznAnarchy99
Originally posted by: Strk
The mechanization of it and that it was one of the primary motivations for the most destructive war ever plays a big part. It was also one of the largest cases of genocide and to go back to it, the mechanization really separates from your typical massacre/death march style genocide.

As for the Armenian genocide, you have a pretty big issue with Turkey refusing to admit it happened, which is also a problem since they don't want other countries to acknowledge it either. That is not saying others don't, but Turkey would prefer that they didn't.

No real need to mechanization for genocide to kill alot of people. Rwanda with its machetes and guns did alot of damage in a short time. No one really knew about Rwanda until the movie.

Dont forget about the killing fields of Cambodia. There are alot of acts of genocides that people arent aware of.


I watched the movie that depicts those events and found it very disturbing (Killing Fields). I do not know enough about the situation to make any comment though.

The media covers up communist purges. *shifty eyes*

Sort of.... We technically supported them through the whole "a friend of a friend" type deal. (We did not support the genocide though, so don't put words in my mouth :)) It's pretty interesting to read up on the subject. I'd say look it up on Wikipedia if you're bored.
 

envy me

Golden Member
Nov 5, 2005
1,000
0
0
Originally posted by: yankeesfan
Originally posted by: envy me
Originally posted by: AznAnarchy99
Originally posted by: Strk
The mechanization of it and that it was one of the primary motivations for the most destructive war ever plays a big part. It was also one of the largest cases of genocide and to go back to it, the mechanization really separates from your typical massacre/death march style genocide.

As for the Armenian genocide, you have a pretty big issue with Turkey refusing to admit it happened, which is also a problem since they don't want other countries to acknowledge it either. That is not saying others don't, but Turkey would prefer that they didn't.

No real need to mechanization for genocide to kill alot of people. Rwanda with its machetes and guns did alot of damage in a short time. No one really knew about Rwanda until the movie.

Dont forget about the killing fields of Cambodia. There are alot of acts of genocides that people arent aware of.


I watched the movie that depicts those events and found it very disturbing (Killing Fields). I do not know enough about the situation to make any comment though.

The media covers up communist purges. *shifty eyes*


Can you explain what you mean by communist purges... I am unfamiliar with that term.

 

AznAnarchy99

Lifer
Dec 6, 2004
14,695
117
106
We support alot of countries that we end up going against later on but thats for another discussion
 

aphex

Moderator<br>All Things Apple
Moderator
Jul 19, 2001
38,572
2
91
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
http://pekingduck.org/archives/000987.php
Why do you say the Holocaust was unique?

That's what a commenter asked me a few minutes ago, even after I said I didn't want to address this subject. Well, too late now. After I wrote my reply, I decided it was worthy of its own post:

Genocide has been here forever and it will probably never go away. Turks and Armenians, Serbs and Croatians, Pol Pot and the Cambodians, Chiang Kai Shek and the Communists, Stalin and Lenin and Mao against the aristocracy and bourgeoisie. In terms of numbers, Stalin may have murdered more than Hitler did, and Mao just may top them all. So why does the Holocaust stand apart?

The Germans were a people that had attained an unmatched level of civilization -- lliterate, educated, sophisticated and artistic. They had brought the world some of the very greatest geniuses, Bach and Mozart and Kant and Nietzsche and Goethe and Heine, to name just a few. That this most-refined society then descended to the point where barbarism was licensed and actively encouraged is one of the great anomalies of history, and new books come out every year as to why Nazism was able to take root and thrive.

The Nazis inflicted this barbarism against the people of Eastern Europe in a way that is literally unimaginable. This in itself is extraordinary enough considering Germany's great culture. But then, just when we know they couldn't get any more monstrous, they bring us The Holocaust.

Here was something that no one could have envisaged because it was simply beyond the scope of human capabilities. An advanced society, technologically adept and renowned for its efficiency and force of will, actually turns this knowledge and skill and determination to a cause so profoundly evil, so totally bad that even today, 60 years later, we try to grapple with it, usually without success. For the first time in man's history, modern assembly-line efficiencies and state-of-the-art technologies were implemented for the primary purpose of exterminating an entire race of people. The sheer level of collaboration and organization is staggering. And it showed us "sophisticated Westerners" just how thin our veneer of civilization really can be.

At least when Stalin and Lenin ordered the mass shootings after the glorious revolution they believed (deludedly and insanely) that they were shooting active, threatening enemies. In the case of the Jews, the Nazis butchered babies, children, mothers, husbands, grandparents, teens -- people who had posed literally no threat, who had done nothing aside from exist. Yet their mere existence was cause enough to invest billions of dollars into the gulag of death camps that would commoditize the mass murder of innocents.

There are many other aspects of the Holocaust that set it apart, like the wanton cruelty of doctors educated in the world's finest universities. (And when I say cruelty, I mean really, really cruel.) Man's inhumanity to man is an old story. But never did we see it displayed like this in the modern age and in the Western world, which had supposedly been reshaped by the Enlightenment into a more tolerant and rational society. It was a grotesque hiccup of history, as though in an instant an entire modern society dropped through a time warp into the dark ages.

There is a reason why the Holocaust has the mystique it does, why it is so disturbing. Unfortunately, "the Holocaust industry" has exploited it, created several myths and in some cases exaggerated its history. But that doesn't take away from what actually happened. Genocide was a thing of the past in Europe. It was from a darker, more violent age. And then the unthinkable happened, and we were forced to face the fact that there is a dark side to man, no matter how civilized or educated he may be.

It's a subject I can go on and on about. Studying the Holocaust offers infinite insights into all aspects of man, from the most base to the most noble, and it will always stand apart as one of the great aberrations in man's history, and one that must never be forgotten. Men were capable of doing it then, and we can repeat it at any time if we fail to remain vigilant against intolerance, hatred and tyranny.

^ very good reply... exactly what i was thinking...
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,584
985
126
Originally posted by: AznAnarchy99
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: AznAnarchy99
Originally posted by: mdchesne
Originally posted by: AznAnarchy99
Native American genocide but no one talks about that since we succeeded. Hitler praised how we eliminated a "inferior" people.

wrong. the difference is because we didn't put them into camps and starve them to death. we put them on reservations, but most of them died fighting off the army in savage battles such as Little Bighorn and Wounded Knee. It was far less brutal than what happened in German and Austria.

so riding westward forcing them off their land and killing those who didnt obey wasnt bad?

Well, we didn't know any better then. Hitler fvcking should have fvcking known better.

dude what kind of argument is that? Know better about what? Its still killing human beings. So genocide was determined bad after about half a century after we killed off a people? We didnt want the Natives on "our" land and we forced them out. We didnt like them and we thought they were "inferior". Its the same thing, Hitler thought the Jewish people were "inferior" and attempted to get rid of them.

Taps sarcasm meter. It was a joke mixed in with little Pulp Fiction reference. ;)
 

AznAnarchy99

Lifer
Dec 6, 2004
14,695
117
106
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: AznAnarchy99
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: AznAnarchy99
Originally posted by: mdchesne
Originally posted by: AznAnarchy99
Native American genocide but no one talks about that since we succeeded. Hitler praised how we eliminated a "inferior" people.

wrong. the difference is because we didn't put them into camps and starve them to death. we put them on reservations, but most of them died fighting off the army in savage battles such as Little Bighorn and Wounded Knee. It was far less brutal than what happened in German and Austria.

so riding westward forcing them off their land and killing those who didnt obey wasnt bad?

Well, we didn't know any better then. Hitler fvcking should have fvcking known better.

dude what kind of argument is that? Know better about what? Its still killing human beings. So genocide was determined bad after about half a century after we killed off a people? We didnt want the Natives on "our" land and we forced them out. We didnt like them and we thought they were "inferior". Its the same thing, Hitler thought the Jewish people were "inferior" and attempted to get rid of them.

Taps sarcasm meter. It was a joke mixed in with little Pulp Fiction reference. ;)

so went over my head. Plus never finished Pulp Fiction.. never have enough time =(
 

xaeniac

Golden Member
Feb 4, 2005
1,641
14
81
no doubt the holocaust was probably the worst act commited by the human race ever