I thought British humor pretty much consisted of men dressing up as women?![]()
And umm..umm...doors! You run in one chasing a guy and he runs out of another one!
I thought British humor pretty much consisted of men dressing up as women?![]()
And umm..umm...doors! You run in one chasing a guy and he runs out of another one!
Hahahahahahaha! You don't look for debate either. We all just shout our own opinion, conservatives, "progressives", it's all the same.
He called me a hack because I support tort reform. All it is is signing a piece of paper and *guaranteed* that expenses are reduced. Seems simple enough to me. Everything about the rest of the reform, the public option, etc., the cost estimates & savings are all based on guesses. Why I would be called a hack by supporting the one guarantee out there, you tell me, since you seem to be so smart![]()
Please explain how the public option actually "cuts costs" and doesn't simply shift costs to "the rich" and middle class? (IE the 53% of us who actually pay taxes)
That's ridiculous, Z.Do you understand that countries like France, Germany and Taiwan etc insure EVERYONE for half what we pay per capita?
100% public option.
I don't know about you but I look forward to my taxes whether private taxes or public taxes going down.
Again all for half price. Think about that.
Now why can't we get there.
Not to mention to human element it's just plain cheaper if done right.
What the fuck is happening here? I'm agreeing more and more with you. Are you being serious?Do you understand that countries like France, Germany and Taiwan etc insure EVERYONE for half what we pay per capita?
100% public option.
I don't know about you but I look forward to my taxes whether private taxes or public taxes going down.
Again all for half price. Think about that.
Now why can't we get there.
Not to mention to human element it's just plain cheaper if done right.
I already provided the citations. Go read em. There are plenty more out there. Type in public option cut costs into google.
I know how you fear citations and actual data... but you've reached a new level of stupidity if you don't even want to read linked information.
Took 2 more seconds on google-
"The public plan would likely have lower administrative costs, though, because insurance would be sold directly to individuals, and not through a broker.
But, the public plan could pay off in the long run. Although providing care may cost more initially, if the public option becomes a vehicle for a large number of currently uninsured people to gain coverage, it could save money  and lives. Its enrollees could avoid becoming chronically ill from a lack of medical attention. And instead of waiting until theyre sick and turning to costly emergency rooms for treatment, Americans insured through the public option could get preventive care to reduce their risk of developing serious diseases."
http://moneywatch.bnet.com/economic...ic-option-everything-you-need-to-know/364824/
Why do state public insurance program see their costs raise as fast or faster than private insurance? Shouldnt they be seeing similar cost savings? Why has Madicare and Medicaid far outpaced initial forecasts?
When Zebo talks about health care being cheap, he's talking about Doctor's paid what UPS drivers are paid. He's talking about when you need new cars on your car, you go to the state run tire factory.
He will decide if you need or deserve health care. HE will decide if you need new tires.
-John
Don't forget the other question of 'why is Medicare and Medicaid so much more cost efficient than private insurance'?
You do understand that we have the highest standing of living in the world. And why is that? Because we are socialist?Right.... because the standard of care and standard of living in the US is so much higher than in industrialized nations with nationalized health care. And there's rationing going on in those far away socialist places as well.
When Zebo talks about health care being cheap, he's talking about Doctor's paid what UPS drivers are paid. He's talking about when you need new cars on your car, you go to the state run tire factory.
He will decide if you need or deserve health care. HE will decide if you need new tires.
-John
That's bullshit. You have CEO's making billions sitting here denying treatments every day. Why not have a gs-9 who makes 75k do it? Guess what even third world costa rica has NHC. I was surprised they can afford it after all the right rhetoric I've heard. And even more surprised to learn doctors make plenty of cash in those countries. (otherwise how do they get people to do it? they don't have slavery)
Since we know that there is no utopia, where poor people are automatically happy, proud, and as rich as all of us (Socialism/Communism), why don't you just shut the fuck up?Remember, many Republicans are morally opposed to poor people receiving health care.
They believe poor people have some sort of fault: drug addiction, sloth, lack of faith in the Capitalist system, wrong color skin, or are just being punished by God.
It is wrong for the government and society as a whole to help these people. They should pull themselves up by their bootstraps and embrace Conservative Morals and Free Market Capitalism.
That's bullshit. You have CEO's making billions sitting here
