ch33zw1z
Lifer
- Nov 4, 2004
- 39,838
- 20,433
- 146
Not really. The SOLE purpose of a gun is to kill.
That's not what's hard to process. The fact that the mom just shot her two daughters in the back is.
Not really. The SOLE purpose of a gun is to kill.
Only because he is white.Taken alive?
I would suggest prior context for that:That's not what's hard to process. The fact that the mom just shot her two daughters in the back is.
With the stress we put each other under, America is real good at breaking people.
It's a fair assessment. Having my own children, and being an emotional person, I still cant wrap my head around it. My kids drive me completely nuts sometimes, but I wouldn't know what to do if something happened to them.I would suggest prior context for that:
for God's sake he blasted away at a young woman as she held her precious tot until both were dead, I don't usually side with a cop but this guy simply said what everyone else felt. I hope in prison someone gets to him and he suffers a physical beating so bad he dies from it, well deserved.I say again, this guy needs to be removed from office:
![]()
Florida sheriff says he wishes deputies would have killed murder suspect
A Florida sheriff says he wishes his deputies would have killed the former Marine who is accused of killing four people on Sunday.“It would’ve been nice if he’d have come out with a gun and then we…thehill.com
for God's sake he blasted away at a young woman as she held her precious tot until both were dead, I don't usually side with a cop but this guy simply said what everyone else felt. I hope in prison someone gets to him and he suffers a physical beating so bad he dies from it, well deserved.
Not really. The SOLE purpose of a gun is to kill.
for God's sake he blasted away at a young woman as she held her precious tot until both were dead, I don't usually side with a cop but this guy simply said what everyone else felt. I hope in prison someone gets to him and he suffers a physical beating so bad he dies from it, well deserved.
His perception is the natural reaction of an outsider to a culture which portrays irresponsible gun ownership as freedom, to the extent that it has used public displays of guns as a means to intimidate and harrass political opponents.This is an odd statement considering that the vast majority of guns are used, yet the vast majority of guns are not used to kill.
I'll take 'What is hunting?' for $10,000 Geordie.This is an odd statement considering that the vast majority of guns are used, yet the vast majority of guns are not used to kill.
This is an odd statement considering that the vast majority of guns are used, yet the vast majority of guns are not used to kill.
I think the idea that I can manage something so therefore it should be freely available in society is a bit of a fallacy. Society'slaws are written to the lowest common denominator, not for the high performing. If everyone was high functioning like yourself we would need almost no laws. There's so many things I can handle perfectly fine that I know the average American can't. Just look at fast food in this country. I can handle it. Many can't.I own several guns, I'm not remotely prepared to kill a human with them. I think I may certainly be in the minority, as many folks own guns primarily for self defense, but I don't suspect it's an incredibly small minority. I also support drastically more aggressive gun control, so, take my perspective as it is.
I'll take 'What is hunting?' for $10,000 Geordie.
The SOLE purpose of guns is to kill. They have NO other purpose.
It's not an odd statement at all. Guns are made for one thing. They're not made to cut sammiches, tighten bolts....pick something.
Guns were always weapons. They were always intended to be weapons. Although some specialized guns can be used for signaling, shooting lines, etc., those are derived from weapons, not the other way around. Weapons are why we are at the top of the food chain. If our minds didn’t have the capacity to construct weapons, we could not also construct computers and cars. And guns are the most effective hand-held weapons that can be conveniently stored, transported, and used. There are historians who study human progress by studying the development of weapons, and those historians often do a better job of demonstrating human cultural change and migration patterns than the sociologists do. The first gun was a weapon; if it was not a weapon, it was not a gun.The purpose of a gun is to fire a bullet.
So what are most guns used for? You can pick something, but it isn't killing.
Personally, I hope he wins his insanity defense."Voices from God."
This will definitely be an insanity defense. Fortunately insanity defenses rarely work.
The purpose of a gun is to fire a bullet.
And what does the round (bullet, shot, etc.) do when it hits the target that happens to be a deer, duck, rabbit, Elk, grouse, squirrel, person, etc.?So what are most guns used for? You can pick something, but it isn't killing.
Guns were always weapons. They were always intended to be weapons. Although some specialized guns can be used for signaling, shooting lines, etc., those are derived from weapons, not the other way around. Weapons are why we are at the top of the food chain. If our minds didn’t have the capacity to construct weapons, we could not also construct computers and cars. And guns are the most effective hand-held weapons that can be conveniently stored, transported, and used. There are historians who study human progress by studying the development of weapons, and those historians often do a better job of demonstrating human cultural change and migration patterns than the sociologists do. The first gun was a weapon; if it was not a weapon, it was not a gun.
Start my car.
There's only one intended purpose for a gun, and they're very good at it.
And what does the round (bullet, shot, etc.) do when it hits the target that happens to be a deer, duck, rabbit, Elk, grouse, squirrel, person, etc.?
Killing is a gun's intended use not matter how hard you try to make it otherwise. Sure they "can" be used for other things - hunting (which is a form of killing), target practice (practice at killing) etc. A gun is and was always a weapon of war, a weapon of killing. War or killing between 2 individuals or multiple countries across the globe. Sure guns are also a deterrent to killing, but only by the threat of killing.I was responding to a poster who said the SOLE purpose of a gun is to kill. If the purpose of a gun is to kill....the ONLY purpose, then why are they almost never used to do that? Why are the vast majority of their uses (like 99.99+%) NOT for killing?
It seems logical to me that there is more purpose to a gun than killing. Is it great at killing? Yes! Is it great at the things that is almost always used for (hint: not killing)? Yes, also.
