Originally posted by: virtueixi
Oh yeah, I would put it right at the top "Suspect grabbed my balls". If I were the officer I would have left it out, I know he would have taken some sh!t about it at the station from his fellow officers.
To all you flaming liberals, one day you will have your wish and make it illegal for an officer to defend himself against someone of a different race. I hope someone grabs all your balls!
Bullsh!t. All this does is reward bad cops for being bad cops, and make it that much harder for municipalities to rid themselves of problem police officers. I couldn't give a sh!t what color the suspect's skin may have been.
Now a city will say, "Yeah, we're paying out lawsuit after lawsuit for this one particular officer's excessive brutality, but if we fire the offending officer or take disciplinary action against him, we will end up having to pay him a huge sum plus hire him back anyway. So we're stuck with a bad cop on the streets and there's nothing when can do even if he finally murders someone."
Don't fool yourself (or try to confuse the issue) that this prevents officers from defending themselves (against anyone). The suspect was in handcuffs. Who should have been in control of the situation? If the suspect did grab his balls, as the officer alleges, then he clearly was not in control and was not following his training, now was he?
As for your flaming liberal comment... I'm not, fsck off <^> Good luck trying to clean up the streets with corrupt cops. :roll:
I swear you fools think that just because you give someone a badge it prevents them from ever committing a criminal act for the rest of their life. I got news. 'Taint so.
edit: I wonder when the so-called "real conservatives" who are backing the officer in this case stopped believing in "at-will employment" and became socialists in regards to guaranteed lifetime employment for government employees?