Fired police officer gets last laugh...

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: Stark
without clicking the link, I'm guessing this is the compton cop.

if I was on the jury, i would have given him the monetary award just to send a message to Je$$ie Jack$on and the stupid racist protestors that made it such a big media event.

Bingo.

I'm very happy at the outcome of this case and the officer deserves every bit of it.
 

virtueixi

Platinum Member
Jun 28, 2003
2,781
0
0
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: Hammer
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: BigJ
His partner filed the report, not him. His partner could've forgotten about it, thought it wasn't necessary in the report, whatever. Maybe the cops felt them hitting him was punishment enough for the grab. I honestly do not know why it was left out.
Well, his partner "forgot" to include the beating they gave the handcuffed suspect in the report as well. Then the testicle-grabbing incident and their admission of the beating came out after the videotape was released to the media.
Coincidence? I think not.

also, rule #1 that every cop knows: never hit a suspect in handcuffs. ever.

bullsh*t. I have cuffed a lot of people and ill tell you this, if a suspect grabs my nuts during a struggle, handcuffed or not he is going to get punched and punched again until he lets go. Its called self defense.

But you would have included that in the report, right?

Oh yeah, I would put it right at the top "Suspect grabbed my balls". If I were the officer I would have left it out, I know he would have taken some sh!t about it at the station from his fellow officers.

To all you flaming liberals, one day you will have your wish and make it illegal for an officer to defend himself against someone of a different race. I hope someone grabs all your balls!
 

maziwanka

Lifer
Jul 4, 2000
10,415
1
0
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
That kid deserved to get his ass beat.

Not sure how I feel about the $1.6 mil. Re-instatement + back pay w/healthy interest at minimum, but then again after going through all that having his job back is probably the last thing he wants.

I say good for him.

BTW, the next time a black cop beats the hell out of a white kid for assaulting him I'll say the same damn thing.

Viper GTS

man. we agree often.

brackis is a damn moron. perhaps 1.6 mil might have been excessive had his name and reputation not been tarnished by the media. most importantly, this decision will serve as a good example of what can/will happen should a similar situation arise.
 

Brackis

Banned
Nov 14, 2004
2,863
0
0
You people who are claiming it's all the flaming liberals who hate cops are still forgetting one simple fact, there is zero proof that the guy had his balls even touched. The assault was caught on tape and is against protocol. Nothing in the even remotley indicates that the officer had his balls touched, and certainly does not warrant giving him 1.6 million dollars.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: virtueixi
Oh yeah, I would put it right at the top "Suspect grabbed my balls". If I were the officer I would have left it out, I know he would have taken some sh!t about it at the station from his fellow officers.

To all you flaming liberals, one day you will have your wish and make it illegal for an officer to defend himself against someone of a different race. I hope someone grabs all your balls!
Bullsh!t. All this does is reward bad cops for being bad cops, and make it that much harder for municipalities to rid themselves of problem police officers. I couldn't give a sh!t what color the suspect's skin may have been.
Now a city will say, "Yeah, we're paying out lawsuit after lawsuit for this one particular officer's excessive brutality, but if we fire the offending officer or take disciplinary action against him, we will end up having to pay him a huge sum plus hire him back anyway. So we're stuck with a bad cop on the streets and there's nothing when can do even if he finally murders someone."
Don't fool yourself (or try to confuse the issue) that this prevents officers from defending themselves (against anyone). The suspect was in handcuffs. Who should have been in control of the situation? If the suspect did grab his balls, as the officer alleges, then he clearly was not in control and was not following his training, now was he?

As for your flaming liberal comment... I'm not, fsck off <^> Good luck trying to clean up the streets with corrupt cops. :roll:
I swear you fools think that just because you give someone a badge it prevents them from ever committing a criminal act for the rest of their life. I got news. 'Taint so.


edit: I wonder when the so-called "real conservatives" who are backing the officer in this case stopped believing in "at-will employment" and became socialists in regards to guaranteed lifetime employment for government employees?
 

CarlKillerMiller

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2003
3,099
0
0
This is really, really big. I'd say that it's the first high-profile reverse discrimination ( that terms means nothing) case I've ever heard of.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: quakefiend420
who pays the 1.6 mil?

Fired police officer gets last laugh...

The American people, specifically Arnold's Californians lose with this.

Actually because I'm sure the City will rely on some sort of Bond or Insurance we all wind up paying for it one way or another :(

Stupid Liberals.

 

gutharius

Golden Member
May 26, 2004
1,965
0
0
Originally posted by: SampSon
I can't wait for the race card to be worth nothing.

This was a suit against the city not the person who was arrested. So i don't see how race could have played an issue unless his superior officer was black.
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: gutharius
Originally posted by: SampSon
I can't wait for the race card to be worth nothing.

This was a suit against the city not the person who was arrested. So i don't see how race could have played an issue unless his superior officer was black.

His superior officer was black.
 

Babbles

Diamond Member
Jan 4, 2001
8,253
14
81
Pretty classy how people imply that they take the word of a criminal over the word of a police officer who had no prior history of racially motivated actions.
 

Schrodinger

Golden Member
Nov 4, 2004
1,274
0
0
Originally posted by: Babbles
Pretty classy how people imply that they take the word of a criminal over the word of a police officer who had no prior history of racially motivated actions.

They had to do it if only to prevent massive riots. It doesn't matter the cop was in the right.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Babbles
Pretty classy how people imply that they take the word of a criminal over the word of a police officer who had no prior history of racially motivated actions.
:roll:

I took the word of Inglewood Police Chief Ronald Banks, who felt justified in firing the officer for his actions. I'm sure that he knows more about what really happened out there than you and I and every other poster here combined.
 

Injury

Lifer
Jul 19, 2004
13,066
2
81
Originally posted by: meltdown75
"but... but... he grabbed my balls!"

"w/e. you're fired."

"I'll see you in teh courtz0rs"

"we didn't trust you... wrongfully fired you... we now owe you $1.6 mil."

fixed?

Not enough evidence to make the assumption from this article alone, but it sounds like a bunch of bull all the way around to me.
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Babbles
Pretty classy how people imply that they take the word of a criminal over the word of a police officer who had no prior history of racially motivated actions.
:roll:

I took the word of Inglewood Police Chief Ronald Banks, who felt justified in firing the officer for his actions. I'm sure that he knows more about what really happened out there than you and I and every other poster here combined.

Apparently not if the court ruled in favor of the officers.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Babbles
Pretty classy how people imply that they take the word of a criminal over the word of a police officer who had no prior history of racially motivated actions.
:roll:

I took the word of Inglewood Police Chief Ronald Banks, who felt justified in firing the officer for his actions. I'm sure that he knows more about what really happened out there than you and I and every other poster here combined.

Vic,

While I agree with your point of view it doesn't prevent the fact that publically media lynching a police officer is popular these days. We face it here in Louisville, KY.

Black guy gets into altercation with police and tries to kill said police - police are bad guys and its plastered all over the front page. White guy gets killed by black police and its buried in a two paragraph story on page 4 of the metro.

Just recently an officer was cleared of any wrong doing for protecting the lives of citizens and taking out the threat, but he still lost his job and was fired by the black police chief. This reverse discrimination and lynching of white cops has to stop.
 

Brackis

Banned
Nov 14, 2004
2,863
0
0
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Babbles
Pretty classy how people imply that they take the word of a criminal over the word of a police officer who had no prior history of racially motivated actions.
:roll:

I took the word of Inglewood Police Chief Ronald Banks, who felt justified in firing the officer for his actions. I'm sure that he knows more about what really happened out there than you and I and every other poster here combined.

Vic,

While I agree with your point of view it doesn't prevent the fact that publically media lynching a police officer is popular these days. We face it here in Louisville, KY.

Black guy gets into altercation with police and tries to kill said police - police are bad guys and its plastered all over the front page. White guy gets killed by black police and its buried in a two paragraph story on page 4 of the metro.

Just recently an officer was cleared of any wrong doing for protecting the lives of citizens and taking out the threat, but he still lost his job and was fired by the black police chief. This reverse discrimination and lynching of white cops has to stop.

Please provide factually based informatuion when bringing up other examples. It makes it much easier to discuss. The fact of the matter is that this guy didn't deserve to be a millionaire for being caught on tape doing something, which is entirely different from an untaped event.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: Brackis
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Babbles
Pretty classy how people imply that they take the word of a criminal over the word of a police officer who had no prior history of racially motivated actions.
:roll:

I took the word of Inglewood Police Chief Ronald Banks, who felt justified in firing the officer for his actions. I'm sure that he knows more about what really happened out there than you and I and every other poster here combined.

Vic,

While I agree with your point of view it doesn't prevent the fact that publically media lynching a police officer is popular these days. We face it here in Louisville, KY.

Black guy gets into altercation with police and tries to kill said police - police are bad guys and its plastered all over the front page. White guy gets killed by black police and its buried in a two paragraph story on page 4 of the metro.

Just recently an officer was cleared of any wrong doing for protecting the lives of citizens and taking out the threat, but he still lost his job and was fired by the black police chief. This reverse discrimination and lynching of white cops has to stop.

Please provide factually based informatuion when bringing up other examples. It makes it much easier to discuss. The fact of the matter is that this guy didn't deserve to be a millionaire for being caught on tape doing something, which is entirely different from an untaped event.

But don't you understand? That is NOT what the award was for. The award was for the damages or and wrongful discrimination.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: spidey07
Vic,

While I agree with your point of view it doesn't prevent the fact that publically media lynching a police officer is popular these days. We face it here in Louisville, KY.

Black guy gets into altercation with police and tries to kill said police - police are bad guys and its plastered all over the front page. White guy gets killed by black police and its buried in a two paragraph story on page 4 of the metro.

Just recently an officer was cleared of any wrong doing for protecting the lives of citizens and taking out the threat, but he still lost his job and was fired by the black police chief. This reverse discrimination and lynching of white cops has to stop.
Well, I appreciate your point of view, Spidey, and see your point, but IMO it's at-will employment. Personally, I would like to see legislation go through making it illegal for public employees to unionize. If you or I or almost everyone else who reads this makes a major mistake on the job, chances are that we're gonna get fired. Not so with the police. Nowadays, they can't be fired even with cause. How can that be good for law enforcement?
And when it becomes impossible for even the worst, most corrupt police officer to be fired (and we're almost there), then the police will rule the city and the law-abiding citizens, and not the other way around like it is supposed to be. Just my $0.02

Originally posted by: spidey07
But don't you understand? That is NOT what the award was for. The award was for the damages or and wrongful discrimination.
Uhh... if that's the case, then why did his partner, who is black, who filed the falsified report, and who only received a 10-day suspension, also get half of the settlement?

From article: "... the jury was unanimous in awarding $810,000 to Morse's partner, Bijan Darvish, who had been disciplined in connection with the 2002 incident."
 

Brackis

Banned
Nov 14, 2004
2,863
0
0
Yes, I do understand. He was fired and a jury was stupid enough to give him heaps of money because he claimed he was fired improperly.
He can claim racism, testicle touching, insanity, LSD in his cereal, or celestial imbalances, but it doesn't refute what was caught by a camera.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: Brackis
Yes, I do understand. He was fired and a jury was stupid enough to give him heaps of money because he claimed he was fired improperly.
He can claim racism, testicle touching, insanity, LSD in his cerial, or celestial imbalances, but it doesn't refute what was caught by a camera.

um, again. What was caught on camera has nothing to do with the chief lynching him and making an example. The reverse discrimination has to stop and it has to stop now.
 

Brackis

Banned
Nov 14, 2004
2,863
0
0
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Brackis
Yes, I do understand. He was fired and a jury was stupid enough to give him heaps of money because he claimed he was fired improperly.
He can claim racism, testicle touching, insanity, LSD in his cerial, or celestial imbalances, but it doesn't refute what was caught by a camera.

um, again. What was caught on camera has nothing to do with the chief lynching him and making an example. The reverse discrimination has to stop and it has to stop now.

Heaven forbid that the chief of police reprimand an officer for hurting the reputation of his force by hitting a teenager.