Originally posted by: Brackis
It's even easier to claim that it happened without proof, and then get a king's ransom in the aftermath.Originally posted by: BigJ
If you're handcuffed, your hands are behind your back. They're below waist level, and at the level of another persons groin. If a police officer is up against the suspect, like they usually are after handcuffing, then it wouldn't be all that hard to grab the officer's balls.
Does the officer have a history of abusing his power and brutality? If so, I'd be much more inclined to believe the suspect. Officers who are caught doing this usually fall into two categories: 1)repeat offenders and 2) having a legitimate reason for the attack. But from what I see, he has no history, was dismissed of the assault charges, and his partner's story backs him up. So yea, I'm goiing to have to go with the cop on this one.