Fired police officer gets last laugh...

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: Brackis
Originally posted by: BigJ


If you're handcuffed, your hands are behind your back. They're below waist level, and at the level of another persons groin. If a police officer is up against the suspect, like they usually are after handcuffing, then it wouldn't be all that hard to grab the officer's balls.
It's even easier to claim that it happened without proof, and then get a king's ransom in the aftermath.

Does the officer have a history of abusing his power and brutality? If so, I'd be much more inclined to believe the suspect. Officers who are caught doing this usually fall into two categories: 1)repeat offenders and 2) having a legitimate reason for the attack. But from what I see, he has no history, was dismissed of the assault charges, and his partner's story backs him up. So yea, I'm goiing to have to go with the cop on this one.
 

rahvin

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,475
1
0
Originally posted by: Brackis
Originally posted by: BigJ


If you're handcuffed, your hands are behind your back. They're below waist level, and at the level of another persons groin. If a police officer is up against the suspect, like they usually are after handcuffing, then it wouldn't be all that hard to grab the officer's balls.
It's even easier to claim that it happened without proof, and then get a king's ransom in the aftermath.

And its even easier to have a knee jerk reaction and fire the guy before conducting an official investigation.
 

DaveThomas

Banned
Jan 19, 2005
1
0
0
That cop shouldn't have gotten 1.6 million, he didn't do the right thing. What he should have done was make the world a better place and shot that dirty fvcking in the face. All you that are against the police officer need to go buy a gun and shoot yourselves.

Later troll
 

lozina

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
11,711
8
81
I seem to have missed the evidence which proves the suspect grabbed the cop by the balls- where is it?

Also, I have a hard time believing a cop would situate themselves over a suspect while handcuffing them in a way that would put his balls in jeopardy- aren't the cops strictly trained in what positions to handcuff suspects?
 

Brackis

Banned
Nov 14, 2004
2,863
0
0
Originally posted by: rahvin
Originally posted by: Brackis
Originally posted by: BigJ


If you're handcuffed, your hands are behind your back. They're below waist level, and at the level of another persons groin. If a police officer is up against the suspect, like they usually are after handcuffing, then it wouldn't be all that hard to grab the officer's balls.
It's even easier to claim that it happened without proof, and then get a king's ransom in the aftermath.

And its even easier to have a knee jerk reaction and fire the guy before conducting an official investigation.
There was freaking video!!!!!!! He made a very stupid move to hit the handcuffed kid. If an employer doesn't want its employees hitting handcuffed people, especially on tape, they can let him go. If he wants to piss and moan to try and get some of his salary given to him he can whine all day, but not become an instant millionaire.
 

lozina

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
11,711
8
81
Originally posted by: DaveThomas
That cop shouldn't have gotten 1.6 million, he didn't do the right thing. What he should have done was make the world a better place and shot that dirty fvcking niggar in the face. All you niggar loving phags that are against the police officer need to go buy a gun and shoot yourselves. Fvcking dirty jew niggar lovers.

what a coward, why don't you post under your normal forum name? :thumbsdown:
 

Nikamichi

Diamond Member
Nov 21, 2003
7,759
0
0
Originally posted by: DaveThomas
That cop shouldn't have gotten 1.6 million, he didn't do the right thing. What he should have done was make the world a better place and shot that dirty fvcking niggar in the face. All you niggar loving phags that are against the police officer need to go buy a gun and shoot yourselves. Fvcking dirty jew niggar lovers.

Way to react to a situation that didn't involve you in any way.

:thumbsdown:
 

TheLonelyPhoenix

Diamond Member
Feb 15, 2004
5,594
1
0
Originally posted by: DaveThomas
That cop shouldn't have gotten 1.6 million, he didn't do the right thing. What he should have done was make the world a better place and shot that dirty fvcking niggar in the face. All you niggar loving phags that are against the police officer need to go buy a gun and shoot yourselves. Fvcking dirty jew niggar lovers.

:disgust:

Die.
 

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,461
4
81
Originally posted by: DaveThomas
That cop shouldn't have gotten 1.6 million, he didn't do the right thing. What he should have done was make the world a better place and shot that dirty fvcking niggar in the face. All you niggar loving phags that are against the police officer need to go buy a gun and shoot yourselves. Fvcking dirty jew niggar lovers.

Wow, I wish you were here and I had a pair of steel toe boots
 

Stark

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2000
7,735
0
0
without clicking the link, I'm guessing this is the compton cop.

if I was on the jury, i would have given him the monetary award just to send a message to Je$$ie Jack$on and the stupid racist protestors that made it such a big media event.
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: Brackis
Originally posted by: rahvin
Originally posted by: Brackis
Originally posted by: BigJ


If you're handcuffed, your hands are behind your back. They're below waist level, and at the level of another persons groin. If a police officer is up against the suspect, like they usually are after handcuffing, then it wouldn't be all that hard to grab the officer's balls.
It's even easier to claim that it happened without proof, and then get a king's ransom in the aftermath.

And its even easier to have a knee jerk reaction and fire the guy before conducting an official investigation.
There was freaking video!!!!!!! He made a very stupid move to hit the handcuffed kid. If an employer doesn't want its employees hitting handcuffed people, especially on tape, they can let him go. If he wants to piss and moan to try and get some of his salary given to him he can whine all day, but not become an instant millionaire.

The video neither proved, nor disproved that the kid grabbed his balls. What would you like the officer to do if his balls were grabbed, kindly ask the kid to stop?
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: lozina
I seem to have missed the evidence which proves the suspect grabbed the cop by the balls- where is it?

Also, I have a hard time believing a cop would situate themselves over a suspect while handcuffing them in a way that would put his balls in jeopardy- aren't the cops strictly trained in what positions to handcuff suspects?

How in the hell else would you handcuff a person unless their hands are behind their back, and you have to approach them from behind and be within a reasonable distance (read: quite close) to actually apply the cuffs and still be able to try to stop the suspect incase he tried to flee. It's not a hard scenario at all to imagine, most people just don't do it.
 

Zeeky Boogy Doog

Platinum Member
Mar 31, 2004
2,295
1
0
Originally posted by: Brackis
Originally posted by: KLin
Originally posted by: Brackis
That seems pretty rediculous. People bust their asses for 20 years to make 1.6 million dollars for their families and this guy gets 1.6 for assualting a guy who is in handcuffs....

If the suspect did grab his testicles like it mentions in the article, I would have reacted the same way.
And would that merit a sum of money equivalent to what 53 hard working americans make in a year?
What is to say he did have his nuts grabbed anyway? From the video he gives no reaction of pain, only hits the guy. If my nuts were grabbed I'd go straight for the guys hand and bend over in agony.

what's to say that it was a painful grab? maybe it was more of a playful grab? then what would you have done?

that said, he didn't deserve that money, definetly not that much anyway, neither did his partner
 

Viper GTS

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
38,107
433
136
That kid deserved to get his ass beat.

Not sure how I feel about the $1.6 mil. Re-instatement + back pay w/healthy interest at minimum, but then again after going through all that having his job back is probably the last thing he wants.

I say good for him.

BTW, the next time a black cop beats the hell out of a white kid for assaulting him I'll say the same damn thing.

Viper GTS
 

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,644
10
81
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: Brackis
That seems pretty rediculous. People bust their asses for 20 years to make 1.6 million dollars for their families and this guy gets 1.6 for assualting a guy who is in handcuffs....

Not to mention getting fired from your job and having your name and likeness spread all over the US and called a racist. The media should have to pick up that 1.6 mill for their story whoring

And should the viewers pay the media for watching it? Let's be reasonable, the media has a responsibility to show that kind of story...

How do you cover a story like that w/o being conveying the cop as racist? That's the story, they are claiming racism!!! Just putting his face in the media and saying "accused of racims" is all it takes to ruin a reputation.
 

Turkish

Lifer
May 26, 2003
15,547
1
81
Originally posted by: Brackis
Originally posted by: rahvin
Originally posted by: Brackis
Originally posted by: BigJ


If you're handcuffed, your hands are behind your back. They're below waist level, and at the level of another persons groin. If a police officer is up against the suspect, like they usually are after handcuffing, then it wouldn't be all that hard to grab the officer's balls.
It's even easier to claim that it happened without proof, and then get a king's ransom in the aftermath.

And its even easier to have a knee jerk reaction and fire the guy before conducting an official investigation.
There was freaking video!!!!!!! He made a very stupid move to hit the handcuffed kid. If an employer doesn't want its employees hitting handcuffed people, especially on tape, they can let him go. If he wants to piss and moan to try and get some of his salary given to him he can whine all day, but not become an instant millionaire.

Quit the ignorance and stupidity of unforeseen monolithic proportions. Yes, that you. Please quit.
 

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,461
4
81
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: Brackis
That seems pretty rediculous. People bust their asses for 20 years to make 1.6 million dollars for their families and this guy gets 1.6 for assualting a guy who is in handcuffs....

Not to mention getting fired from your job and having your name and likeness spread all over the US and called a racist. The media should have to pick up that 1.6 mill for their story whoring

And should the viewers pay the media for watching it? Let's be reasonable, the media has a responsibility to show that kind of story...

How do you cover a story like that w/o being conveying the cop as racist? That's the story, they are claiming racism!!! Just putting his face in the media and saying "accused of racims" is all it takes to ruin a reputation.

No, the media is guilty of sensationalizing and running with stories that have little to any truth just for the sake of printing it first...ie the whole Bush awol at the National Guard thing that forced Dan Rather to retire.
 

lozina

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
11,711
8
81
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: lozina
I seem to have missed the evidence which proves the suspect grabbed the cop by the balls- where is it?

Also, I have a hard time believing a cop would situate themselves over a suspect while handcuffing them in a way that would put his balls in jeopardy- aren't the cops strictly trained in what positions to handcuff suspects?

How in the hell else would you handcuff a person unless their hands are behind their back, and you have to approach them from behind and be within a reasonable distance (read: quite close) to actually apply the cuffs and still be able to try to stop the suspect incase he tried to flee. It's not a hard scenario at all to imagine, most people just don't do it.

Right, but can you only handcuff someone if you squat your balls onto their hands? Seems like an awfully dangerous position so I have a hard time believing cops would be trained to handcuff someone in such a manner... any resident cops here who have gone through some basic handcuffing training?
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: lozina
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: lozina
I seem to have missed the evidence which proves the suspect grabbed the cop by the balls- where is it?

Also, I have a hard time believing a cop would situate themselves over a suspect while handcuffing them in a way that would put his balls in jeopardy- aren't the cops strictly trained in what positions to handcuff suspects?

How in the hell else would you handcuff a person unless their hands are behind their back, and you have to approach them from behind and be within a reasonable distance (read: quite close) to actually apply the cuffs and still be able to try to stop the suspect incase he tried to flee. It's not a hard scenario at all to imagine, most people just don't do it.

Right, but can you only handcuff someone if you squat your balls onto their hands? Seems like an awfully dangerous position so I have a hard time believing cops would be trained to handcuff someone in such a manner... any resident cops here who have gone through some basic handcuffing training?

How much effort and time do you actually think it takes for someone to backup a foot and squeeze? Read I didn't say squat your balls on their hands, I said you have to be very close. My father is a retired CO and says he can see it happening pretty easily if the Officer is not extremely careful and the suspect wants to try something.

EDIT: And also, it wouldn't be hard for an officer to have to get that close if he had to frisk the suspect (which he should have).
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Complete BS. Those cops deserved to be fired. The entire incident was caught on videotape, and while tape does clearly show the cop beating on the handcuffed suspect, it does not show the testicle-grabbing that the cop claims. Pulling out the race card and stealing this jury award from the taxpaying public is beyond outrageous.