Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: BigJ
Yes I would disagree with the term being used. That is not a beating. If this was brought to trial between civilians, it would've probably been thrown out because it's ridiculous. Party A was wrong to sexually assault and grab Party B's balls first, and Party B was wrong to have hit and thrown Party A. If this was a beating, the kid would've been in a lot worse shape than from just a punch and a shove.
I'm not saying the cop was totally right; he should've been placed on administrative leave, or been possibly suspended without pay, but he should not have lost his job. I mean if someone grabs your balls, how would you go about getting them to stop?
He lost his job because of the suspect being black and being labeled as a racist by the media, and I'm glad he was compensated for the unfair treatment. The compensation is a little much, but he definitely deserved something. He is not a bad cop, he just overreacted.
You're dense or something. Falsifying police reports is an overreaction? Breaking the law by assaulting a handcuffed suspect wasn't grounds enough to lose his job? It just
had to be the race issue right, not that they broke the law by covering the incident up, right?
"I mean" if I was a professional police officer, I would know that the first rule they teach in the police acadamies about dealing with a handcuffed suspect is to not place yourself in a situation where that suspect could potentially harm you in the first place.
In short, you're an idiot.