Fired police officer gets last laugh...

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Garet Jax

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2000
6,369
0
71
Originally posted by: KLin
Originally posted by: Brackis
That seems pretty rediculous. People bust their asses for 20 years to make 1.6 million dollars for their families and this guy gets 1.6 for assualting a guy who is in handcuffs....

If the suspect did grab his testicles like it mentions in the article, I would have reacted the same way.

Doesn't make it right. It should have been another charge levied against the teenager.
 

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,644
10
81
Originally posted by: Nitemare
No, the media is guilty of sensationalizing and running with stories that have little to any truth just for the sake of printing it first...ie the whole Bush awol at the National Guard thing that forced Dan Rather to retire.

You mean he wasn't AWOL?!?

;)

I don't recall seeing *that* much coverage of this story, it was covered, they showed the video (quite a bit) then it fell off the map. It was only around for a couple of days in the national media.

Originally posted by: Vic
Complete BS. Those cops deserved to be fired. The entire incident was caught on videotape, and while tape does clearly show the cop beating on the handcuffed suspect, it does not show the testicle-grabbing that the cop claims. Pulling out the race card and stealing this jury award from the taxpaying public is beyond outrageous.

So the lack of proof=proof it didn't happen? I'm thinking no... Cops make arrests all day long w/o video, are you upset about that too?

Judge: What happened.
Cop: Your honor, I saw them steal a loaf of bread off the counter and walk out the store with out paying.
Judge: Got video?
Cop: No.
Judge: Dismissed!

You OK with that?

edit: clipped unnecessary quotes.
 

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,644
10
81
Originally posted by: Garet Jax
Originally posted by: KLin
Originally posted by: Brackis
That seems pretty rediculous. People bust their asses for 20 years to make 1.6 million dollars for their families and this guy gets 1.6 for assualting a guy who is in handcuffs....

If the suspect did grab his testicles like it mentions in the article, I would have reacted the same way.

Doesn't make it right. It should have been another charge levied against the teenager.

Was there an additional charge? If not, the cop's position is *very* shaky. I don't think the cop would let me grab his nuts and let me go w/o charges...

For what it's worth, I think the $1.6M is a bit steep... TORT REFORM!!!
 

Garet Jax

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2000
6,369
0
71
Originally posted by: BigJ
After getting his nuts grabbed.

If that is true, why wasn't everything in his partner's report. If this is indeed true, then the officer has the right to protect himself and the punch and slam against the hood was justified.
 

Garet Jax

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2000
6,369
0
71
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
Originally posted by: Garet Jax

Doesn't make it right. It should have been another charge levied against the teenager.

Was there an additional charge? If not, the cop's position is *very* shaky. I don't think the cop would let me grab his nuts and let me go w/o charges...

For what it's worth, I think the $1.6M is a bit steep... TORT REFORM!!!

This is exactly my contention. If the teenager did grab the balls, then it should have been in the report and retaliation would have been jusitified. However there is no mention of this ball grabbing until after they were caught. Very fishy...
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: Garet Jax
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
Originally posted by: Garet Jax

Doesn't make it right. It should have been another charge levied against the teenager.

Was there an additional charge? If not, the cop's position is *very* shaky. I don't think the cop would let me grab his nuts and let me go w/o charges...

For what it's worth, I think the $1.6M is a bit steep... TORT REFORM!!!

This is exactly my contention. If the teenager did grab the balls, then it should have been in the report and retaliation would have been jusitified. However there is no mention of this ball grabbing until after they were caught. Very fishy...

His partner filed the report, not him. His partner could've forgotten about it, thought it wasn't necessary in the report, whatever. Maybe the cops felt them hitting him was punishment enough for the grab. I honestly do not know why it was left out.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
So the lack of proof=proof it didn't happen? I'm thinking no... Cops make arrests all day long w/o video, are you upset about that too?

Judge: What happened.
Cop: Your honor, I saw them steal a loaf of bread off the counter and walk out the store with out paying.
Judge: Got video?
Cop: No.
Judge: Dismissed!

You OK with that?

edit: clipped unnecessary quotes.
If you read the article, you will see that neither officer nor his partner included the testicle-grabbing incident or the beating they gave the suspect in their official reports. This is why his partner received his 10-day suspension. It was not until AFTER the bystander videotape showing the beating came out that they changed their stories and claimed the testicle-grabbing incident. I have followed this story since it was first made public back in the summer of 02.
Your analogy doesn't work.

What I am not okay with are police officers who think they are above the law, or seek to hide behind the badge to justify their own criminally violent behaviors.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: BigJ
His partner filed the report, not him. His partner could've forgotten about it, thought it wasn't necessary in the report, whatever. Maybe the cops felt them hitting him was punishment enough for the grab. I honestly do not know why it was left out.
Well, his partner "forgot" to include the beating they gave the handcuffed suspect in the report as well. Then the testicle-grabbing incident and their admission of the beating came out after the videotape was released to the media.
Coincidence? I think not.
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: BigJ
His partner filed the report, not him. His partner could've forgotten about it, thought it wasn't necessary in the report, whatever. Maybe the cops felt them hitting him was punishment enough for the grab. I honestly do not know why it was left out.
Well, his partner "forgot" to include the beating they gave the handcuffed suspect in the report as well. Then the testicle-grabbing incident and their admission of the beating came out after the videotape was released to the media.
Coincidence? I think not.

It was not a "beating," the officer punched the kid and threw him against the car. I'd like to see how many police officers actually report every time they toss someone against the car for being uncooperative. Do you know if the police report said if the suspect was being uncooperative?
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,578
982
126
Originally posted by: Brackis
That seems pretty rediculous. People bust their asses for 20 years to make 1.6 million dollars for their families and this guy gets 1.6 for assualting a guy who is in handcuffs....

What's really rediculous is how you spelled ridiculous.
 

Hammer

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
13,217
1
81
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: BigJ
His partner filed the report, not him. His partner could've forgotten about it, thought it wasn't necessary in the report, whatever. Maybe the cops felt them hitting him was punishment enough for the grab. I honestly do not know why it was left out.
Well, his partner "forgot" to include the beating they gave the handcuffed suspect in the report as well. Then the testicle-grabbing incident and their admission of the beating came out after the videotape was released to the media.
Coincidence? I think not.

also, rule #1 that every cop knows: never hit a suspect in handcuffs. ever.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: BigJ
It was not a "beating," the officer punched the kid and threw him against the car. I'd like to see how many police officers actually report every time they toss someone against the car for being uncooperative. Do you know if the police report said if the suspect was being uncooperative?
Really? So if one civilian were to attack another in a similar fashion, you would disapprove of the prosecutor calling the incident a "beating" at the felony assault trial?
Originally posted by: Hammer
also, rule #1 that every cop knows: never hit a suspect in handcuffs. ever.
Bingo.


For the record: I don't care about the suspect. What I do care about is that allowing (hell, rewarding based on the lawsuit award) this type of corrupt behavior from bad cops makes every good cop in America look bad, and further erodes the public's faith in our legal system. And I care about that quite a bit. As probably 99% of the cops in America are "good", I cannot for the life of me figure out why they protect the very few bad cops.
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: BigJ
It was not a "beating," the officer punched the kid and threw him against the car. I'd like to see how many police officers actually report every time they toss someone against the car for being uncooperative. Do you know if the police report said if the suspect was being uncooperative?
Really? So if one civilian were to attack another in a similar fashion, you would disapprove of the prosecutor calling the incident a "beating" at the felony assault trial?
Originally posted by: Hammer
also, rule #1 that every cop knows: never hit a suspect in handcuffs. ever.
Bingo.


For the record: I don't care about the suspect. What I do care about is that allowing (hell, rewarding based on the lawsuit award) this type of corrupt behavior from bad cops makes every good cop in America look bad, and further erodes the public's faith in our legal system. And I care about that quite a bit. As probably 99% of the cops in America are "good", I cannot for the life of me figure out why they protect the very few bad cops.

Yes I would disagree with the term being used. That is not a beating. If this was brought to trial between civilians, it would've probably been thrown out because it's ridiculous. Party A was wrong to sexually assault and grab Party B's balls first, and Party B was wrong to have hit and thrown Party A. If this was a beating, the kid would've been in a lot worse shape than from just a punch and a shove.

I'm not saying the cop was totally right; he should've been placed on administrative leave, or been possibly suspended without pay, but he should not have lost his job. I mean if someone grabs your balls, how would you go about getting them to stop?

He lost his job because of the suspect being black and being labeled as a racist by the media, and I'm glad he was compensated for the unfair treatment. The compensation is a little much, but he definitely deserved something. He is not a bad cop, he just overreacted.
 

NikPreviousAcct

No Lifer
Aug 15, 2000
52,763
1
0
Originally posted by: SampSon
I can't wait for the race card to be worth nothing.

Me too. Sadly, I don't think it's going to be any time soon. :( Part of my family lives in Oklahoma. The entire city they live in is STILL segregated between blacks and whites. Literally everything, including school and a hospital with two wings -one for blacks, one for whites-, etc. However, there's no major crimes committed based on race. It's just like two completely different worlds living in the same place.

While that kind of bullsh|t still exists in some parts of the contry, I think most of the stories you hear about racist in the media come from areas where racism isn't a problem --just the people who try pulling the card because they're just trying to get what they want, no matter what the cost.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: BigJ
Yes I would disagree with the term being used. That is not a beating. If this was brought to trial between civilians, it would've probably been thrown out because it's ridiculous. Party A was wrong to sexually assault and grab Party B's balls first, and Party B was wrong to have hit and thrown Party A. If this was a beating, the kid would've been in a lot worse shape than from just a punch and a shove.

I'm not saying the cop was totally right; he should've been placed on administrative leave, or been possibly suspended without pay, but he should not have lost his job. I mean if someone grabs your balls, how would you go about getting them to stop?

He lost his job because of the suspect being black and being labeled as a racist by the media, and I'm glad he was compensated for the unfair treatment. The compensation is a little much, but he definitely deserved something. He is not a bad cop, he just overreacted.
You're dense or something. Falsifying police reports is an overreaction? Breaking the law by assaulting a handcuffed suspect wasn't grounds enough to lose his job? It just had to be the race issue right, not that they broke the law by covering the incident up, right?

"I mean" if I was a professional police officer, I would know that the first rule they teach in the police acadamies about dealing with a handcuffed suspect is to not place yourself in a situation where that suspect could potentially harm you in the first place.

In short, you're an idiot.
 

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,644
10
81
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
So the lack of proof=proof it didn't happen? I'm thinking no... Cops make arrests all day long w/o video, are you upset about that too?

Judge: What happened.
Cop: Your honor, I saw them steal a loaf of bread off the counter and walk out the store with out paying.
Judge: Got video?
Cop: No.
Judge: Dismissed!

You OK with that?

edit: clipped unnecessary quotes.
If you read the article, you will see that neither officer nor his partner included the testicle-grabbing incident or the beating they gave the suspect in their official reports. This is why his partner received his 10-day suspension. It was not until AFTER the bystander videotape showing the beating came out that they changed their stories and claimed the testicle-grabbing incident. I have followed this story since it was first made public back in the summer of 02.
Your analogy doesn't work.

What I am not okay with are police officers who think they are above the law, or seek to hide behind the badge to justify their own criminally violent behaviors.

I agree that's much more relevant, you noted the lack of video evidence in your post, which I though was pointless...

Considering it was left out of the report until after the fact I don't see the justifcation for the award. Tough call about wether or not he should have been fired... I think that would have been the prudent thing, so I guess you have moved me to the other side of the fence. I think he should have been fired for not including relelvant details in the report, and the jury shouldn't have awarded him anything because there was valid reason.
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: BigJ
Yes I would disagree with the term being used. That is not a beating. If this was brought to trial between civilians, it would've probably been thrown out because it's ridiculous. Party A was wrong to sexually assault and grab Party B's balls first, and Party B was wrong to have hit and thrown Party A. If this was a beating, the kid would've been in a lot worse shape than from just a punch and a shove.

I'm not saying the cop was totally right; he should've been placed on administrative leave, or been possibly suspended without pay, but he should not have lost his job. I mean if someone grabs your balls, how would you go about getting them to stop?

He lost his job because of the suspect being black and being labeled as a racist by the media, and I'm glad he was compensated for the unfair treatment. The compensation is a little much, but he definitely deserved something. He is not a bad cop, he just overreacted.

You're dense or something. Falsifying police reports is an overreaction? Breaking the law by assaulting a handcuffed suspect wasn't grounds enough to lose his job? It just had to be the race issue right, not that they broke the law by covering the incident up, right?

"I mean" if I was a professional police officer, I would know that the first rule they teach in the police acadamies about dealing with a handcuffed suspect is to not place yourself in a situation where that suspect could potentially harm you in the first place.

In short, you're an idiot.

How did he falsify the police report? It was his partner that did so, and he was suspended for 10 days. He wasn't fired. Rightfully so for not documenting it.

Also, the assault case was dismissed, so I guess some people felt he was justified in his actions resulting from a suspect grabbing his balls. He should not have been fired over it. A desk job, administrative leave, suspension; any of those would've been suitable. Not termination.

So you're telling me, in your trained profession, you've never been in a situation where you could lapse in your thinking, and have something occur as a result of it. Do you have a link to the video of the arrest? Because the grabbing could've happened a number of times where the officer is close enough to make the arrest. If you're behind a suspect, you'd assume you are reasonably safe if they're bent over and you are next to them. If he had gotten kicked in the face because he was looking at the suspects shoe laces, that would've been a whole different story.
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
So the lack of proof=proof it didn't happen? I'm thinking no... Cops make arrests all day long w/o video, are you upset about that too?

Judge: What happened.
Cop: Your honor, I saw them steal a loaf of bread off the counter and walk out the store with out paying.
Judge: Got video?
Cop: No.
Judge: Dismissed!

You OK with that?

edit: clipped unnecessary quotes.
If you read the article, you will see that neither officer nor his partner included the testicle-grabbing incident or the beating they gave the suspect in their official reports. This is why his partner received his 10-day suspension. It was not until AFTER the bystander videotape showing the beating came out that they changed their stories and claimed the testicle-grabbing incident. I have followed this story since it was first made public back in the summer of 02.
Your analogy doesn't work.

What I am not okay with are police officers who think they are above the law, or seek to hide behind the badge to justify their own criminally violent behaviors.

I agree that's much more relevant, you noted the lack of video evidence in your post, which I though was pointless...

Considering it was left out of the report until after the fact I don't see the justifcation for the award. Tough call about wether or not he should have been fired... I think that would have been the prudent thing, so I guess you have moved me to the other side of the fence. I think he should have been fired for not including relelvant details in the report, and the jury shouldn't have awarded him anything because there was valid reason.

The police officer who filed the report was not the one whos testicles was grabbed. The police officer who filed the report was suspended for 10 days.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
Originally posted by: Hammer
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: BigJ
His partner filed the report, not him. His partner could've forgotten about it, thought it wasn't necessary in the report, whatever. Maybe the cops felt them hitting him was punishment enough for the grab. I honestly do not know why it was left out.
Well, his partner "forgot" to include the beating they gave the handcuffed suspect in the report as well. Then the testicle-grabbing incident and their admission of the beating came out after the videotape was released to the media.
Coincidence? I think not.

also, rule #1 that every cop knows: never hit a suspect in handcuffs. ever.

bullsh*t. I have cuffed a lot of people and ill tell you this, if a suspect grabs my nuts during a struggle, handcuffed or not he is going to get punched and punched again until he lets go. Its called self defense.
 

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,644
10
81
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: Hammer
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: BigJ
His partner filed the report, not him. His partner could've forgotten about it, thought it wasn't necessary in the report, whatever. Maybe the cops felt them hitting him was punishment enough for the grab. I honestly do not know why it was left out.
Well, his partner "forgot" to include the beating they gave the handcuffed suspect in the report as well. Then the testicle-grabbing incident and their admission of the beating came out after the videotape was released to the media.
Coincidence? I think not.

also, rule #1 that every cop knows: never hit a suspect in handcuffs. ever.

bullsh*t. I have cuffed a lot of people and ill tell you this, if a suspect grabs my nuts during a struggle, handcuffed or not he is going to get punched and punched again until he lets go. Its called self defense.

But you would have included that in the report, right?
 
Aug 23, 2000
15,509
1
81
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: Brackis
That seems pretty rediculous. People bust their asses for 20 years to make 1.6 million dollars for their families and this guy gets 1.6 for assualting a guy who is in handcuffs....

Not to mention getting fired from your job and having your name and likeness spread all over the US and called a racist. The media should have to pick up that 1.6 mill for their story whoring

Exactly. The guy is branded a racist. And having been fired from a Police Officer position, he will never be able to get a job as a cop again. If he has spent a majority of his working years a cop and was wanting to do it till retirement, 1.6Mil isn't overboard.
If he were to make $75,000 a year(which is easy to do with OT and side jobs) in 30years when he retires he would have made $2.25mil. He is getting short changed since he also going to have to pay taxes and his lawyer.