Finally, I take no responsibility for what you do with the information in this guide. Overclock your hardware at your ow

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

dclive

Elite Member
Oct 23, 2003
5,626
2
81
Originally posted by: starams5


Well, well, well if it Ronald McDonald himself. I don't really care how many burgers you flipped or what you bought. "Lets point out all the flaws in everyone else" The truth is, you are nothing but a coward, fess up Ronald.

What in the world does your post have to do with his? His is yet another voice in the chorus that's condemning your actions.

If you break something, man up and fix it - don't try to get everyone else to pay for it.
 

dclive

Elite Member
Oct 23, 2003
5,626
2
81
Originally posted by: starams5

I started LMAO when I seen this. To answer your question, yes I initially feel guilty about RMAing parts when its my fault they failed but not all of us can afford ($$$) to take the high road. "Let he who is without sin, cast the first stone"

and then later:

You are a complete idiot if you think I admitted anything, fool!

You admitted exactly that when you wrote the above - you RMAd parts when it was your fault they broke.
 

starams5

Member
May 7, 2009
97
0
0
Originally posted by: dclive
Originally posted by: starams5


Well, well, well if it Ronald McDonald himself. I don't really care how many burgers you flipped or what you bought. "Lets point out all the flaws in everyone else" The truth is, you are nothing but a coward, fess up Ronald.

What in the world does your post have to do with his? His is yet another voice in the chorus that's condemning your actions.

If you break something, man up and fix it - don't try to get everyone else to pay for it.

All I see is a bunch of hypercritical followers.
 

starams5

Member
May 7, 2009
97
0
0
Originally posted by: dclive
Originally posted by: starams5
All I see is a bunch of hypercritical followers.

Why do you steal from others? Or perhaps more to the point, why do you defend that action publicly?

The only fraud going on around here is you claiming to be a saint.

This type of personal attack is not allowed here. Clean up your act, or you will get a vacation

Markfw900
Anandtech Moderator
 

dclive

Elite Member
Oct 23, 2003
5,626
2
81
Originally posted by: dclive
Originally posted by: starams5

I started LMAO when I seen this. To answer your question, yes I initially feel guilty about RMAing parts when its my fault they failed but not all of us can afford ($$$) to take the high road. "Let he who is without sin, cast the first stone"

and then later:

You are a complete idiot if you think I admitted anything, fool!

You admitted exactly that when you wrote the above - you RMAd parts when it was your fault they broke.

Above clearly demonstrates fraud.
 

starams5

Member
May 7, 2009
97
0
0
And I stand by everything I said, you are the coward for not standing up for any of your wrong doings. You would rather have us all believe otherwise then be a man and tell the truth. Coward!
 

Stumps

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2001
7,125
0
0
Originally posted by: starams5
And I stand by everything I said, you are the coward for not standing up for any of your wrong doings. You would rather have us all believe otherwise then be a man and tell the truth. Coward!

The simple fact that you feel the need to attack of people to justify your action's rather than just take it on the chin gives us a clear indication of your moral standings.

But to be fair, having worked many years in computer retail I know this for a fact, as long as the failed item in question show's no signs of physical damage (broken components, tampering etc) it will always pass RMA no matter what purpose the item has been used for, which is why some many people can get away with RMA'ing item's that they have used incorrectly (Overclocking etc).

If manufacturers were really worried about the misuse of their products and fraudulent RMA claim's then they would have a more stringent inspection process of returned items in place.

But at the end of the day it's always the consumer that ends up paying for others actions.

I should add that a lot of computer stores will still RMA an item even when they clearly know what the cause of the failure was and it normally should have it's warranty voided.

It all comes down to morals I guess.
 
Dec 30, 2004
12,553
2
76
Still pointing fingers.

Starams5-- FYI: If you vote for the right person, they will send you money as long as you shirk responsibility.
 
Dec 30, 2004
12,553
2
76
Originally posted by: Stumps
Originally posted by: starams5
And I stand by everything I said, you are the coward for not standing up for any of your wrong doings. You would rather have us all believe otherwise then be a man and tell the truth. Coward!

The simple fact that you feel the need to attack of people to justify your action's rather than just take it on the chin gives us a clear indication of your moral standings.

But to be fair, having worked many years in computer retail I know this for a fact, as long as the failed item in question show's no signs of physical damage (broken components, tampering etc) it will always pass RMA no matter what purpose the item has been used for, which is why some many people can get away with RMA'ing item's that they have used incorrectly (Overclocking etc).

If manufacturers were really worried about the misuse of their products and fraudulent RMA claim's then they would have a more stringent inspection process of returned items in place.

But at the end of the day it's always the consumer that ends up paying for others actions.

It's nearly impossible to test for this stuff. You have to be an engineer to figure it out; and if you're an engineer you've got better things to be doing than testing RMA's.

I for one hope Nvidia/ATI/Intel/AMD come up with a chip that will monitor the voltages you've applied to the different components-- simply log them-- to shut down crap like this.
 

Stumps

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2001
7,125
0
0
Originally posted by: soccerballtux
Originally posted by: Stumps
Originally posted by: starams5
And I stand by everything I said, you are the coward for not standing up for any of your wrong doings. You would rather have us all believe otherwise then be a man and tell the truth. Coward!

The simple fact that you feel the need to attack of people to justify your action's rather than just take it on the chin gives us a clear indication of your moral standings.

But to be fair, having worked many years in computer retail I know this for a fact, as long as the failed item in question show's no signs of physical damage (broken components, tampering etc) it will always pass RMA no matter what purpose the item has been used for, which is why some many people can get away with RMA'ing item's that they have used incorrectly (Overclocking etc).

If manufacturers were really worried about the misuse of their products and fraudulent RMA claim's then they would have a more stringent inspection process of returned items in place.

But at the end of the day it's always the consumer that ends up paying for others actions.

It's nearly impossible to test for this stuff. You have to be an engineer to figure it out; and if you're an engineer you've got better things to be doing than testing RMA's.

I for one hope Nvidia/ATI/Intel/AMD come up with a chip that will monitor the voltages you've applied to the different components-- simply log them-- to shut down crap like this.

A "black box" would be a fantastic idea for computer hardware but it's probably just cheaper for manufacturers to replace failed items rather than implement such a feature.

 

starams5

Member
May 7, 2009
97
0
0
Originally posted by: soccerballtux
Originally posted by: Stumps
Originally posted by: starams5
And I stand by everything I said, you are the coward for not standing up for any of your wrong doings. You would rather have us all believe otherwise then be a man and tell the truth. Coward!

The simple fact that you feel the need to attack of people to justify your action's rather than just take it on the chin gives us a clear indication of your moral standings.

But to be fair, having worked many years in computer retail I know this for a fact, as long as the failed item in question show's no signs of physical damage (broken components, tampering etc) it will always pass RMA no matter what purpose the item has been used for, which is why some many people can get away with RMA'ing item's that they have used incorrectly (Overclocking etc).

If manufacturers were really worried about the misuse of their products and fraudulent RMA claim's then they would have a more stringent inspection process of returned items in place.

But at the end of the day it's always the consumer that ends up paying for others actions.

It's nearly impossible to test for this stuff. You have to be an engineer to figure it out; and if you're an engineer you've got better things to be doing than testing RMA's.

I for one hope Nvidia/ATI/Intel/AMD come up with a chip that will monitor the voltages you've applied to the different components-- simply log them-- to shut down crap like this.

So now you want to be a hardware snitch's, what a sad bunch. One jumps off the cliff and they all jump......you're nothing but weak followers and that's all you'll ever be.

This type of personal attack is not allowed here. Clean up your act, or you will get a vacation

Markfw900
Anandtech Moderator
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: starams5
Originally posted by: soccerballtux
Originally posted by: Stumps
Originally posted by: starams5
And I stand by everything I said, you are the coward for not standing up for any of your wrong doings. You would rather have us all believe otherwise then be a man and tell the truth. Coward!

The simple fact that you feel the need to attack of people to justify your action's rather than just take it on the chin gives us a clear indication of your moral standings.

But to be fair, having worked many years in computer retail I know this for a fact, as long as the failed item in question show's no signs of physical damage (broken components, tampering etc) it will always pass RMA no matter what purpose the item has been used for, which is why some many people can get away with RMA'ing item's that they have used incorrectly (Overclocking etc).

If manufacturers were really worried about the misuse of their products and fraudulent RMA claim's then they would have a more stringent inspection process of returned items in place.

But at the end of the day it's always the consumer that ends up paying for others actions.

It's nearly impossible to test for this stuff. You have to be an engineer to figure it out; and if you're an engineer you've got better things to be doing than testing RMA's.

I for one hope Nvidia/ATI/Intel/AMD come up with a chip that will monitor the voltages you've applied to the different components-- simply log them-- to shut down crap like this.

So now you want to be a hardware snitch's, what a sad bunch. One jumps off the cliff and they all jump......you're nothing but weak followers and that's all you'll ever be.

Hold on a minute :p

Weak?
:confused:

You are the weak one pretending to be something you are not. You take the easy way out every time and then brag about "getting away" with it. You then get all "self righteous" when you get called on it.

You are costing all of his here money by ripping off vendors and now all of a sudden you don't like us pointing out that you have no morals and no personal responsibility?
:confused:

You are taking the hypocrite route and blaming others are for rightly saying "no" to your elitist, entitled, lack of morals and rude attitude that steals from us all; --you are no one to trade with either, in my book
:roll:


 

TuxDave

Lifer
Oct 8, 2002
10,571
3
71
lol I wish people who commit fraud would at least admit it. The denial/rationalization cracks me up. And yes I have a very high moral standard when it comes to retail purchases so don't use me as an excuse for the crap you do.
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: TuxDave
lol I wish people who commit fraud would at least admit it. The denial/rationalization cracks me up. And yes I have a very high moral standard when it comes to retail purchases so don't use me as an excuse for the crap you do.

i wish they wouldn't mention it at all. :p
- they should be embarrassed instead; this "bragging" just shows their extreme lack of moral fiber
[well, i guess it is a good warning against trading with them ;) ]

it is just damn irritating when they try to *justify* it by calling the rest of us hypocrites at the same time they are ripping us off by their fraudulent RMAs - and then bragging about it as though it is something desirable for the rest of us to do. :|
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,570
10,203
126
Originally posted by: Stumps
A "black box" would be a fantastic idea for computer hardware but it's probably just cheaper for manufacturers to replace failed items rather than implement such a feature.
True, which is why we haven't seen these sorts of features yet in mainstream products. It's certainly technically possible to engineer them.

 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
37
91
Overclocking is extremely easy. If you ruin hardware doing it, you deserve it.
 

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
21,020
3,491
126
okey someone once asked me this question... when do you think a RMA is valid.

Here is when and where i think they are valid.

1. when its not a result of a oh shit.. or a oh crap, or a 4 letter word which starts with f.
2. when you cant see anything visably wrong with your card. Ive had video cards die with no apparent reason, and no matter how hard u look they looked brand new.
3. When a capacitor or a mosfet blows out from non tampering. You would be amazed at how many bad caps one can run into.

When i asked a video card vendor when do they usually start denying RMA's.
The typical answer i get is, as long as u didnt run over it with your car, we dont see that you drilled holes into it, and there isnt any signs of you doing something bad to the card.

So basically it all falls down to my #1. If it wasnt a result of a 4 letter word f word, i think your in your all grounds to RMA.


To be honest, a moderate overclock, using an aftermarket sink would = out to the life span of a stock setting + stock sink.

So if you overclock smart, you made an equivalent exchange. Where as i am doing extreme overclocking at the cost of extreme cooling. So my cpu's will probably outlast all yours because it runs that much cooler. :p
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: aigomorla
okey someone once asked me this question... when do you think a RMA is valid.

Here is when and where i think they are valid.

1. when its not a result of a oh shit.. or a oh crap, or a 4 letter word which starts with f.
2. when you cant see anything visably wrong with your card. Ive had video cards die with no apparent reason, and no matter how hard u look they looked brand new.
3. When a capacitor or a mosfet blows out from non tampering. You would be amazed at how many bad caps one can run into.

When i asked a video card vendor when do they usually start denying RMA's.
The typical answer i get is, as long as u didnt run over it with your car, we dont see that you drilled holes into it, and there isnt any signs of you doing something bad to the card.

So basically it all falls down to my #1. If it wasnt a result of a 4 letter word f word, i think your in your all grounds to RMA.


To be honest, a moderate overclock, using an aftermarket sink would = out to the life span of a stock setting + stock sink.

So if you overclock smart, you made an equivalent exchange. Where as i am doing extreme overclocking at the cost of extreme cooling. So my cpu's will probably outlast all yours because it runs that much cooler. :p

you guys might enjoy reading this if you haven't seen it yet. i believe the OP works for BFGTech in RMA
[i think :eek:] .. but anyway, some great stories and pics of what some people try to RMA [& what happens]

RMA for fun and profit!
 
Dec 30, 2004
12,553
2
76
Originally posted by: VirtualLarry
Originally posted by: Stumps
A "black box" would be a fantastic idea for computer hardware but it's probably just cheaper for manufacturers to replace failed items rather than implement such a feature.
True, which is why we haven't seen these sorts of features yet in mainstream products. It's certainly technically possible to engineer them.

Would hardly cost much at all; $0.50 for a component and maybe $0.10 for the extra traces.
Once the programming of the MCU is done, it'll be cake to monitor it.
:thumbsup:
 

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
22,546
12,413
136
Originally posted by: starams5


"This is about people costing me extra money when I buy parts." If it bothers you then stop buying parts, and stop whining.

No, and no. Please stop trolling. Though you seem to have done so already, so good show!

Leave a thread for a day and look what happens. Good grief.

Originally posted by: apoppin

You have to realize that there is something called "morals"
- the financial crash was related directly to lack of them

what one does affects others .. actually everyone; in higher prices overall

rose.gif

My point exactly. Doesn't take a Moral Orel to figure that out.

Besides, we routinely warn people, edit posts, lock threads, and ban here for even talking about software piracy, so I don't see why we would encourage or tolerate RMA fraud.
 

Itchrelief

Golden Member
Dec 20, 2005
1,398
0
71
Originally posted by: starams5
Originally posted by: dclive
Originally posted by: starams5
All I see is a bunch of hypercritical followers.

Why do you steal from others? Or perhaps more to the point, why do you defend that action publicly?

The only fraud going on around here is you claiming to be a saint.

I love how "everyone does it" gives carte blanche to do anything these days.

There is a line between forgiving people for minor past transgressions and rationalizing current and future sins.

In the former, the transgressors attempt to halt the practice. In the latter, there is no attempt to alter behavior at all. It's just empty words "oh I know what I'm doing is wrong" while continuing to do it. In essence, it's just lip service.
 

frostedflakes

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2005
7,925
1
81
Originally posted by: soccerballtux
Originally posted by: VirtualLarry
Originally posted by: Stumps
A "black box" would be a fantastic idea for computer hardware but it's probably just cheaper for manufacturers to replace failed items rather than implement such a feature.
True, which is why we haven't seen these sorts of features yet in mainstream products. It's certainly technically possible to engineer them.

Would hardly cost much at all; $0.50 for a component and maybe $0.10 for the extra traces.
Once the programming of the MCU is done, it'll be cake to monitor it.
:thumbsup:
$0.60 x millions of units is a lot of money, though. Like Stumps pointed out, if it was more cost effective to do this companies already would be.
 

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
I have killed processors before by overclocking / modifying . Two I ruined with a drill bit, depth was set too deep. Another I ruined with painting on conductive paint. That was in the early days when overclocking was a lot harder and usually involved soldering irons, wire and sometimes the occasional pencil.

As for the onboard bios chips. Yes you can screw them up and on the newer boards you can't just swap them out. Usually they are soldered on and they are no longer programmed like the old eprom chips. The new ones are SPI chips that require a programmer designed for the task and different software.