Edge is now the best browser!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

mikeymikec

Lifer
May 19, 2011
20,966
16,203
136
Others may be faster in browser tests but in real world usage I don't really notice the difference at all.

+1

The only differences I've consistently spotted is that:

a) with IE I've always found it irritating when it starts and the UI takes a few seconds to become usable (depending on the website that is loading), it's also possible to render the menu unusable by trying to use it while a website loads.

b) With Firefox, if I loaded a 36 tab job, the UI would freeze for short periods of time as Firefox's lack of threadyness caught up with it. It's one of the reasons why I switched to Chrome, which plows through the job without freezing and a good deal quicker.

only if you exclude desktop and factor in android devices. Otherwise no, IE has the biggest chunk.

http://1u88jj3r4db2x4txp44yqfj1.wpe...s/2015/05/firefox_market_share_april_2015.png

Both are desktop browser stats:
http://gs.statcounter.com/#desktop-browser-ww-monthly-200807-201607

https://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=2&qpcustomd=0
 

imaheadcase

Diamond Member
May 9, 2005
3,850
7
76
If you put Edge on the back burner or in the trash and forgot about it, I highly suggest looking at it again after you update to Redstone. ;)

They made some really nice improvements, the greatest obviously being the extensions. I'm LOVING the translator! It's really awesome, and it works very seamlessly with Edge. Performance has improved as well, along with stability.

Also, Edge now has hardware acceleration for VP9, something which Chrome doesn't have yet. So if you have a Pascal GPU or RX480, you can watch VP9 encoded 4K footage without it hammering your CPU.. :cool:

Yah a whole %8 is hammering my CPU.
Not only that, but translate works with Chrome just great.

Literally nothing worth switching over for.
 

TeknoBug

Platinum Member
Oct 2, 2013
2,084
31
91
Yeah the method of extension addons for Edge is a bit weird (and it's in the programs & features list once installed, not going to be switching to Edge anytime soon anyways- I only use Edge for Netflix on my HTPC. Otherwise pretty happy with Vivaldi.
 

nerp

Diamond Member
Dec 31, 2005
9,865
105
106
Chrome used to be good. So bloated and slow now, though. Edge is superior now.
 

TheRyuu

Diamond Member
Dec 3, 2005
5,479
14
81
Also, Edge now has hardware acceleration for VP9, something which Chrome doesn't have yet. So if you have a Pascal GPU or RX480, you can watch VP9 encoded 4K footage without it hammering your CPU.. :cool:

Chrome has added support for hardware accelerated VP9 (now in the dev channel) if you have one of the few cards that support it. If you look at chrome://gpu you can see support for it and whether or not it's using hardware acceleration.

that's annoying, they require you to use your microsoft account to download a browser extension and it's tied to the windows store.. nope, I'll continue to use other browsers that don't require this.

You can enable developer mode for extensions which allow you to load unpacked extensions the same way you can do so in Chrome. The setting is on the about:config page. There may be security side effects of doing this but you should be ok so long as you don't install malicious extensions.

You're still limited on what extensions work. While Microsoft has done a good job provided a faithful recreation of the WebExtensions API that Chrome (and other) browsers use it still requires some very slight changes for compatibility. There is already a version of uBlock Origin for Edge in the works although it's not complete yet. I think we should see HTTPS Everywhere at some point as well.
 
Last edited:

JimmiG

Platinum Member
Feb 24, 2005
2,024
112
106
I use Edge exclusively on my Atom-powered tablet/2in1 with 2 GB RAM. It's much more touch friendly (smooth zooming and scrolling) and seems to use less memory and perform better on a low-end system. I can even have 4-5 tabs open without noticeable slowdowns.

On my desktop system and work laptop, I use Vivaldi. I don't like the minimalist UI of Edge on a bigger screen. My laptop has a Quad-core CPU and 8GB RAM, the desktop Quad-core and 16 GB, so it doesn't really matter which browser is the fastest.
 

Carfax83

Diamond Member
Nov 1, 2010
6,841
1,536
136
performance has always been 2nd to utility, options and customizability for me.
Can you set tabs on bottom or change where the close tab button is? Seems silly until you are opening and closing enough tabs in quick succession that it really slows you down. But what's really silly is having no option to choose at all.

OK I can understand performance not being a priority, but what about security and stability? FF has been less secure and less stable than Chrome (and probably even IE) over the years because they didn't have the multi-process architecture and no sandboxing.

Firefox is still the least secure major web browser.

Granted things have changed now, but the point is FF didn't possess these crucial attributes unlike their competitors, and this was the status quo for years. That to me is completely unacceptable and a deal breaker.
 

coffeemonster

Senior member
Apr 18, 2015
241
87
101
OK I can understand performance not being a priority, but what about security and stability? FF has been less secure and less stable than Chrome (and probably even IE) over the years because they didn't have the multi-process architecture and no sandboxing.

Firefox is still the least secure major web browser.

Granted things have changed now, but the point is FF didn't possess these crucial attributes unlike their competitors, and this was the status quo for years. That to me is completely unacceptable and a deal breaker.
I've been using mozilla/firefox since it's inception, and I've been using adblockers and no-script for as long as they've been available. I've never spent much time fretting over some hacker targeting my machine directly, and I've never been infected with anything scarier than ad generators. I'll keep using the more user friendly browser for the small extra risk it entails.

Stability has not been a serious enough issue with firefox. Firefox maybe crashes once a week for me, and it recovers in a matter of seconds. The difference is meaningless. The only area that FF has been noticeably less stable is streaming youtube and twitch. But I use VLC for that now anyway.

The bottom line is there are too many features present in FF only that are a deal breaker for every other browser. I have no allegiance to any of them, and I'm always looking for new ones to match FF's versatility. I have high hopes for Vivaldi.
 

Puffnstuff

Lifer
Mar 9, 2005
16,197
4,881
136
Edge needs an interface just like IE. Give me a menu up top with drop down bookmarks that I can edit on the fly without having to open up some ludicrous amount of steps to get to.
 

nerp

Diamond Member
Dec 31, 2005
9,865
105
106
Edge needs an interface just like IE. Give me a menu up top with drop down bookmarks that I can edit on the fly without having to open up some ludicrous amount of steps to get to.

I agree: the bookmarks system is lacking. I want an easy way to clean up and sort bookmarks. Right now it's so damn clunky.
 

TheRyuu

Diamond Member
Dec 3, 2005
5,479
14
81
The BIG benifit of Edge comes on mobile. It's just a lot better for battery usage on a laptop or what have you. That's where it shines IMO.
 

StinkyPinky

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2002
6,973
1,276
126
Chrome is atrocious for mobile, it's a terrible battery hog. I do use it on the desktop though, partially because I'm used to it as I've been using it since it was released 9-10 years ago. If I had a windows laptop I would definitely use Edge.
 

Puffnstuff

Lifer
Mar 9, 2005
16,197
4,881
136
I think that MS is purposely trying to force us off IE and onto edge based upon the number of crashes and freezes I've been having over the last year with it. Half the time new tabs don't work when I launch them and I have to close and reopen them up. Pages that IE stutters on FF will load quickly. Come on MS patch up edge and allow users to choose between the classic IE interface and your uber stupid modern interface.
 

mikeymikec

Lifer
May 19, 2011
20,966
16,203
136
I think that MS is purposely trying to force us off IE and onto edge based upon the number of crashes and freezes I've been having over the last year with it.

Given the ease with which virtually any user can switch to any browser (including third party browsers that happen to have a far superior reputation to Edge), IMO this would be an incredibly stupid strategy for MS.

I have little doubt that IE has reached the end of its evolution however; any inefficiencies in its design are likely to remain.

IMO you should clear out IE's cache and do a full IE reset and give it another try. I haven't seen anything that suggests that it has suddenly become an unstable browser.
 

fleshconsumed

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2002
6,486
2,363
136
I can't believe that FF is this popular. The browser comparisons I've seen usually tout FF as the slowest browser. Heck, they just recently added multi processes, a feature that Microsoft and Google have had in their browsers for years o_O
My primary browser is FF because it offers the best set of security/privacy/usability extensions, namely:
- AdBlockPlus
- NoScript
- FlashBlock
- FireGestures
 

TheRyuu

Diamond Member
Dec 3, 2005
5,479
14
81
- AdBlockPlus
- NoScript

You can replace both of these with uBlock Origin[1]. Dynamic filtering[2] in uBlock replaces NoScript. If you like the granulatiry of NoScript you can also try uMatrix[3] (instead of dynamic filtering in uBlock). I believe uMatrix has a much more intuitive interface than NoScript but to each his own.

- FlashBlock

What does FlashBlock do that the browser currently doesn't do when setting a plugin as "Ask to activate"?

[1] https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock#installation
[2] https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Blocking-mode:-medium-mode
[3] https://github.com/gorhill/uMatrix#umatrix
 

Carfax83

Diamond Member
Nov 1, 2010
6,841
1,536
136
Edge needs an interface just like IE. Give me a menu up top with drop down bookmarks that I can edit on the fly without having to open up some ludicrous amount of steps to get to.

Edge already has that feature. You can directly access your bookmarks by clicking on the hub icon at the top right in one step, or you can drag them to the area below the address bar.

You can also easily edit them by right clicking..
 

Puffnstuff

Lifer
Mar 9, 2005
16,197
4,881
136
Edge will not import my bookmarks from IE correctly and constantly drops many of them during the import process. Edge does not allow me to change the properties of the bookmark like IE does. Edge has a dufus tablet/ touch screen based interface and is useless on a desktop without the proper mouse oriented interfaces. All this is doing is forcing me off to FF so I can browse with minimal retardedness. At least FF syncs all of my data to the cloud just in case something should go wrong so I can get it back instantly as does chrome.
 

sweenish

Diamond Member
May 21, 2013
3,656
60
91
Edge syncs your stuff as well. Do you also complain about extra features that FF and Chrome bundle like FF Hello and Chrome's attempt at shoving Chrome OS into a browser?

FF is less secure, and no amount of extensions will fix a fundamentally flawed browser in that regard. I haven't tried bookmark importing, so I can't speak to that. But with the anniversary update, Edge is definitely worth consideration. It is a fast, compliant browser. So, from my experience, you might have one valid complaint, not the list you attempted. All browsers are imperfect. I've started using Edge now that I can block ads, and it's pretty great.
 

paperfist

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2000
6,539
287
126
www.the-teh.com
OK I can understand performance not being a priority, but what about security and stability? FF has been less secure and less stable than Chrome (and probably even IE) over the years because they didn't have the multi-process architecture and no sandboxing.

Firefox is still the least secure major web browser.

Granted things have changed now, but the point is FF didn't possess these crucial attributes unlike their competitors, and this was the status quo for years. That to me is completely unacceptable and a deal breaker.

So which one is the best balance between speed and security?
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
Still use FF myself, have played with Edge a bit in the past.

Might try it out again with Redstone rolling out.