Originally posted by: Selso2109
My computer is going to eat doom 3 and half life 2 for breakfast
Not really.
Originally posted by: Selso2109
My computer is going to eat doom 3 and half life 2 for breakfast
Originally posted by: Selso2109
My computer is going to eat doom 3 and half life 2 for breakfast
Originally posted by: StrangerGuy
Originally posted by: Selso2109
My computer is going to eat doom 3 and half life 2 for breakfast
Although you have a insane rig, it's still not enough for D3 with max settings.
Originally posted by: Selso2109
I am positive my comp will be blasting through doom 3 at the maxed out 60 fps. I have the settings on far cry maxed with full AA and AF and I NEVER drop below 30 FPS and my average is over 60 FPS.
PC Gamer reviewed DoomIII with 3.0ghz p4 and 6800Ultra and they were only able to enable AA/AF at 1024x768.
Originally posted by: Selso2109
first of all NO ONE has reviewed doom 3 yet. Second of all, my processor and video card are both better performers than the setup they "claimed" to have used. If they did manage to test anything it was most likely alpha code that wasn't even finished yet. Too bad so sad I'll post benchmarks for you non believers on AUGUST 3.
THANKS
possibly . . . better replace any defective CD-ROMSOriginally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: Selso2109
My computer is going to eat doom 3 and half life 2 for breakfast
Not really.
Originally posted by: Selso2109
first of all NO ONE has reviewed doom 3 yet.
Originally posted by: thegimp03
lol, i love how people are so competitive when it comes to their system being able to play a game...let it go, d3 hasn't even been benchmarked yet...of course id will throw the lowest settings possible on the box in order to sell as many copies as possible...it's all marketing.![]()
This point has been made before, and so has the counter-point. The game engine will drive many up-coming titles, so getting your system ready for D3 means getting it ready for a bunch of upcoming titles as well :light:Originally posted by: rickn
Originally posted by: thegimp03
lol, i love how people are so competitive when it comes to their system being able to play a game...let it go, d3 hasn't even been benchmarked yet...of course id will throw the lowest settings possible on the box in order to sell as many copies as possible...it's all marketing.![]()
and not only that, single player is only 20hrs of gameplay, he he. so many nerds are gonna go shell out $1000's of dollars on computer junk to play $54 game that lasts 20hrs.
Originally posted by: Nebor
Your credibility is just about ZERO now.
That goon never had any to begin with. He's a board nazi, plain and simple.
I'm wondering if my p4 @ 3.5ghz and a r9800p @ 420\360 can run Doom 3 @ 1280x1024 w/ 4xAA and 8xAF and nice details.... Or do I need to upgrade my video card to a 6800 Ultra? Or upgrade CPU to an a64? Both?
Originally posted by: Optimummind
I know the statement I'm about to make may sound like "Oh brother, not this again," but I heard from a Fry's employee that Doom 3 ran fine on his computer with a 9800XT with a 3.0GHZ computer.
Originally posted by: EvanAdams
Why in the world run something at 16x12 with AA and AF? That seems like a waste. At that resolution you dont need those.