Red Dawn
Elite Member
- Jun 4, 2001
- 57,529
- 3
- 0
if there's one thing Fox News viewers hate, it's pretty women who are villianized by the mainstream media.
If that was all they hated they wouldn't be so ridiculed.
if there's one thing Fox News viewers hate, it's pretty women who are villianized by the mainstream media.
::Sigh::
Half the people on this board are fucking retarded. Its not a stretch to think that someone in the GOP has been made aware by police or the FBI the shooter was influenced by suggestive political slogans so they're removing all traces to minimize the fallout.
My second suggestion had nothing to do with the shooter being influenced by slogans, just that said slogans put politicians in political jeopardy after a shooting. Its cool how you make shit up though.
Obviously they're worried about something or they wouldn't be taking them off the 'net right?
You know Giffords's office was vandalized after she voted for healthcare reform? So I guess that was just some nut too right, and not someone who believed the right's rhetoric that painted healthcare reform as a fascist communist Kenyan takeover?
Really? So now it's some conspiracy that they're trying to hide something and they secretly know they caused the shooting? THAT's why you think they're taking it down? REALLY?
Could it possibly be that while at the time, what Palin and others were saying was perfectly fine. But now, out of respect for the dead, it's not such a good idea right now? Nope, couldn't be that, it's some huge conspiracy.
No. Not I'm not saying its a conspiracy you fucking idiot.My second suggestion had nothing to do with the shooter being influenced by slogans, just that said slogans put politicians in political jeopardy after a shooting. Its cool how you make shit up though.
Yes...it's "obvious" that they must be guilty of "something".::Sigh::
Half the people on this board are fucking retarded. Its not a stretch to think that someone in the GOP has been made aware by police or the FBI the shooter was influenced by suggestive political slogans so they're removing all traces to minimize the fallout.
My second suggestion had nothing to do with the shooter being influenced by slogans, just that said slogans put politicians in political jeopardy after a shooting. Its cool how you make shit up though.
Obviously they're worried about something or they wouldn't be taking them off the 'net right?
Oh god, you're hopeless. If you really think this guy was some sort of planted assassination attempt by right-wingers, then you're as crazy as he is.I don't just blame Sarah, she is just a part of the vast right wing conspiracy that existed then and has only strengthened now to the point of explosiveness as witnessed this weekend.
you're as crazy as he is.
Yes...it's "obvious" that they must be guilty of "something".![]()
There is just no way you can equate the propaganda coming from the left to that of the right. There is an order of magnitude in difference that is plainly apparent. Hell, look no further than the campaigns of the last election as proof. But anyway, if that kid had eyes and ears I can pretty much guarantee he was exposed to that hateful rightwing rhetoric as much as everyone else was. Yes he's also clearly obviously disturbed, and maybe he decided in 2007 he was going to do something like this. Or maybe it took 3 more years of the kind of vitriol spewed by the right to turn his screw enough to actually do it. I don't know. You don't know. But to defend those who overtly encouraged this very sort of thing, and created such an upside down environment where we actually have morons defending it because "maybe" it didn't contribute to this incident, is flat out sickening.
How about this possibility...media fallout. It's already started even though there's no facts that even remotely connect Palin/Kelly to Loughner's actions. All we have right now are "intellectuals" like you in the media speculating and making baseless assumptions."Either these 2 feel or have knowledge that they somehow influenced the shooter (which I doubt, but until the investigation is over we won't know)"
You're perfect evidence for why a politician shouldn't use suggestive slogans and images, your brain twists everything.
If you disagree with me that they aren't worried about the political fallout then please give us a reason why they are removing this content from the internet.
wasnt the guy a gold standard nutter anyways?
How about this possibility...media fallout. It's already started even though there's no facts that even remotely connect Palin/Kelly to Loughner's actions. All we have right now are "intellectuals" like you in the media speculating and making baseless assumptions.
Simple, either these 2 feel or have knowledge that they somehow influenced the shooter (which I doubt, but until the investigation is over we won't know), or they recognize that by using these slogans they've put themselves in political danger. If they were smart they would have recognized both of these possibilities from the start and not put themselves in this position.
My second suggestion had nothing to do with the shooter being influenced by slogans, just that said slogans put politicians in political jeopardy after a shooting.
Political fallout and media fallout aren't the same thing...at least in my book.Umm..yes, that was my suggestion as well.
Political fallout and media fallout aren't the same thing...at least in my book.
Possibly yes...possibly no. Two different things Dr. Einstein.Wow, so if Palin and this guy suffered a media fallout from this you don't think it would risk a Political fallout huh?![]()
Wow, it is just soooo interesting how FOX and their hired talking heads are handling this. It's like I'm watching a whole different station all of a sudden.
Well, back to normal in a few days I guess. Can't let the "implicative" and "symbolic" armed war on Obama and those demon commie-yet-fascist Dems get too cold. I'm sure they've already determined when to fire up the faux vitriole right down to the very second it's again "allowable".
Possibly yes...possibly no. Two different things Dr. Einstein.
Who vandalized it? Why did they vandalize it? Where was Sarah?
You mean a Republican's office has never been vandalized, and we can't ever claim it was a left winger who did it?
Far leftys never go too far? Or do we just not report the incidents?
The far left didn't hate W? I could have sworn I lived through 8 years of vitiriol. Maybe I was dreaming?
This shit is hilarious.![]()
Horrible. I hope Palin never gets elected to any political office again...evah!Out of curiosity, how great do you think Palin would be as President?
If you want to connect the vandalism to tea party members you'd probably get somewhere. Now connect it to what Loughlin did, and I mean with evidence.
I think we've discovered a religion, faith based guilt.
FNC reported that? Uh oh, someones now on Roger Ailes shit list at that station.
Hmm, you sound like the leftists insisting that there's no evidence that Wikileaks outing people put them in danger or caused them to be killed.
You don't see how creating this political atmosphere where your opponents are fascist communist Kenyan enemies of the state legitimizes violence? Oh I'm sorry, I think you prefer the term "2nd amendment solution" to "violence".
