Originally posted by: Lemon law
The PokerGuy lack of logic is almost wholly contaned her with "LOL. Your entire repsonse did not list a single thing that qualifies her for being a senator, unless you count writing a book as a qualification, in which case I'm also qualified."
Ok, so you wrote a book, she wrote a book, you may be both equally qualified in your own mind, but at the end of the day, your logic stinks, you are in a distinct minority, she threw her hat in the ring and you did not, and Caroline may or may not get the appointment from the New York Governor.
Get over it PokerGuy, you ain't the decider, and in a game where high hand wins, you have the lowest hand in existence, a 2, 3, 4, 6,7, maybe a world beater in a game of low, but other wise, anything beats your nothing. Notice I missed the ace, I sure would not you to have the option of declaring it high or low at your illogical convince.
Dude, are you delusional? Of course none of us are the decider. You were busy yappin' about Bush and his gang over the last 8 years, yet you had the same "nothing" hand that we all have, but it didn't stop you from posting did it?
I'm still waiting for someone to provide any reasonable qualifications for her to be a senator, other than "she's a Kennedy". "She's a Kennedy" is not a qualification, any more than Jenna Bush is qualfied to be president. "She threw her hat in the ring" is also not a qualification, anyone can throw their hat in the ring. So far, the summary of why she's likely to become a powerful senator is "she's a democrat, and she's a Kennedy".
Craig, please stop the babbling trying to compare relative merits of one "political family" versus another. The Kennedy's have plenty of skeletons in there, from pedos to murderers to drunkards etc, just like *any* family. It's completely irrelevant as to whether one specific individual is qualified for a job or not.
