Anatomy of a Disaster
Originally posted by: terpsy
I, as many others, have legitimate copies of Vista through MSDN as well as being beta testers for Microsoft. This is not my first Beta Test, nor will it be my last.
MSDN OS licenses are for developers who need advance access to the RTM to prepare their software for official retail launch. That's why they call it a
developer network. So your premise is faulty, and the rest of your post falls.
I stated that in my opinion, the fact of having no driver for the 8800 series and Vista leads me to believe that there is a SERIOUS problem going on in writing the driver. It has been RTM for about 2 months now, and not even a Beta driver. I stated that we may find out that you will need to purchase the revision hardware, as the launch hardware is not fully DX10 compatible or may need to change for the driver and Vista to work correctly.
Technically, we may find out tomorrow that scientists have accidentally set loose a super virus against which we have no defense and no hope of curing. Possible? Yes. Probable? No, exactly the opposite. You may not have done anything wrong in your posting, but this making kind of wild speculation in the absence of facts is just irresponsible and stupid.
I also stated that I did not purchase the 8800 so that I can have a few more FPS in XP.
I bought this card for the same reason I feel everyone else has, to get full use and speed
In Vista.
Marketing of the "Vista Ready" kind only suckers people who are already desperate to believe something. Unethical? Yes, but also partially your own fault. When you see a vague term like that, which could mean any of five completely different things just off the top of my head, you just made something up and spent a great deal of money for it. Reading about the hardware before buying would have revealed that a) Vista has a DX9 performance hit necessary because of the way the OS itself is designed and b) there are no DX10 games out yet. So there's no evidence to support the conclusion upon which you based your purchase.
If all I wanted was XP performance, an ATI X1950 or 7900 Series GPU would have been just fine.
Your choice, your problem.
Note: I hate marketing speech and have fallen into this trap myself.
There are Drivers for every ATI card as well as all PREVIOUS NVidia GPU?s for Vista,
Why not for the card that was SUPPOSEDLY built for Vista? What is the big secret that
Is being hidden from the public, as well as the review sites? I already know the card is purchased is 10% cheaper, and may turn out to be the Next Voodoo5 series.
QA
Obviously, the hardware is different enough that nVidia has split their XP unified drivers into G80 and pre-G80 variants. Porting an existing, reasonably stable pre-G80 driver to Vista took lots of time. Why shouldn't simultaneously creating/learning new Vista driver models take the G80 driver team right up until official launch? If I ran nVidia, I'd rather have an on-time launch than have an early launch that could blow up in my face.
Then again, maybe nVidia will have a pleasant surprise for Vista users. We're just speculating here, right?
In the past, NVidia was known for being just a tad worse than ATI in desktop graphics, but the driver support could not be beat. Over the past couple of years, this has changed. And in my opinion, ATI is far more concerned about their drivers, and are constantly working to improve them. That was the main reason I had stuck with Nvidia through the years. But after this latest situation, I am appalled at the actions and non-communication from NVidia on their flagship card.
I totally agree with this paragraph except for the last statement. nVidia owes nothing for an operating system that has not been officially released to the general public.
What is the big surprise on Jan 30th, that we have all invested in a card that runs Aero, but ends there? The performance is beaten by the ATI X1900 series and 7900 GPU?s in Vista? When someone has nothing to hide, they communicate and have Beta drivers available. Why the BIG curtain on the 8800 series and Vista? I must have the most expensive VGA display for Vista (of course, only beaten by those with 8800GTX SLI setups).
Perhaps the beta driver has serious problems. Who knows? But basing your argument on your admitted lack of knowledge about the driver development process is folly.
This was Chris Ray?s Private Message on the Nvidia Forums to me?
You have a new personal message from ChrisRay
Stop returning to the forums.
Stop coming back to these forums. You are not welcome on them.
ChrisRay is a member of the Moderators group and has 910 posts.
Thanks Chris, I see where Nvidia is heading currently, and look forward to
The AMD-ATI offering for my future endeavors?
No surprise there. Mods vent by cracking down hard on people, occasionally without just cause. But Chris's behavior is still inexcusable, and I must commend you for restraining your emotions (if not your speculation).