lupi
Lifer
- Apr 8, 2001
- 32,539
- 260
- 126
Blizz announced with 4.3 that wrath xp leevels getting reduced.
RAF is already stupid easy through Wrath (say that five times fast). I think we did Borean, half of Grizzly, and most of Scholozar and we were 80.Damn. With RAF XP bonus goes to 80 that would make leveling 1-80 extremely fast.
I'm somewhat tempted to do another RAF just to experience this.
RAF is already stupid easy through Wrath (say that five times fast). I think we did Borean, half of Grizzly, and most of Scholozar and we were 80.
Couple that with all the EXP bonus gear you can wear and leveling requires very little time. I dont know why blizz just doesnt come out with max level toons that you can buy already.
Anyone have any advice for a Restoration Shaman on Baleroc? It seems our Shaman is having some issues with proc heals messing up the fight mechanics (I don't know them too well to describe what exactly is happening). I know she's already stopped using Earth Shield on tanks because of how it screws things up.
3) The healer is not using fast enough heals (or doesn't have the haste) to build up sparks fast enough. Example, my resto shaman is a haste build so I have 22% Haste, other shaman is more balance so they sit at around 12% haste, with my haste I can time and chain RT>UL>HS>HS while tormented is eating 12 stacks gaining me 16 sparks while the other healer can barely get two spells in (usually RT>HS) due to GCD and cast time.)
I appreciate all the information! I'll forward the post along.
Hmm I wonder if Haste could be a problem here. I checked the armory, and it looks like she has 8.81% spell haste.
Where is a good place to find PvP info? Starting PvPing and looking for some help on gems/enchants/glyphs and what not.
k. probably a good idea.Looking for Raid tool raids will be easier than normal raids using a new level of difficulty (Looking For Raid).
why not both? and won't that make the que times incredibly long?The Looking for Raid tool will only work for 25 man raids, not 10 man.
considering the LFR is 25m only, and 99% of 'actual' raids are 10m, that could be a problem. Given how many people are likely to be carried through 25m LFR raids, I dont see this helping to 'prepare' anyone a great deal.This will introduce players to the content and mechanics of the fights so that they are more prepared for an actual raid.
Impressive. PoS and definitely HoR had excellent lore integration.The new five mans will have tighter story integration with the Deathwing Raid than Icecrown Heroics did.
I bet at least one of them dies/sacrifices themselvesThe Dragonflights will work together to help take down Deathwing.
BFDThey might be talking about Pandas at Blizzcon.
I thinl why it willl be 25 man only is a) they are redesigning with difficulty/loot and onlly want to do it once and b) they know that with 25 people there is a larger per person margin to error.
One thing I considered was buff management. Unless Blizzard wants to write this intricate AI to help ensure 99.9% of buffs and debuffs are covered by certain classes/talent combos, it would probably be easier to just allow 25 people and write a less sophisticated selection routine.
Also, if they did 10 and 25, it would require them to re-tune two sets of data (boss hp, damage, etc.) rather than just one. Kind of a lame excuse, but that could be part of it.
Equitable Remedies.
In the event that you breach this Agreement, you hereby agree that Blizzard would be irreparably damaged if this Agreement were not specifically enforced, and therefore you agree that Blizzard shall be entitled, without bond, other security, or proof of damages, to appropriate equitable remedies with respect to breaches of this Agreement, in addition to such other remedies as Blizzard may otherwise have available to it under applicable laws. In the event any litigation is brought by either party in connection with this Agreement and consistent with Section 17, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to recover from the other party all the costs, attorneys' fees and other expenses incurred by such prevailing party in the litigation."
Anybody have any sites for Warrior Tank reading apart from tankspot?