Fenixgoon
Lifer
- Jun 30, 2003
- 33,272
- 12,836
- 136
this ought to go well:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...other-net-neutrality-opponent-to-oversee-fcc/
time to pay up just to post on P&N...</s>. but anyone who thinks this is in any way good for the internet as a whole is in for a very rude awakening. when trump was first elected, though i was horrified, i thought "oh maybe congress will reign him in"...and then i realized even if congress were to hypothetically oppose trump at every turn, he could still appoint very powerful policy makers (FCC, EPA, etc.).
and that part really scares the shit out of me more than anything else at this point.
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...other-net-neutrality-opponent-to-oversee-fcc/
time to pay up just to post on P&N...</s>. but anyone who thinks this is in any way good for the internet as a whole is in for a very rude awakening. when trump was first elected, though i was horrified, i thought "oh maybe congress will reign him in"...and then i realized even if congress were to hypothetically oppose trump at every turn, he could still appoint very powerful policy makers (FCC, EPA, etc.).
and that part really scares the shit out of me more than anything else at this point.