Why should any consumer care about how much products Apple or any other company sold? More sales does not make it a better product, in case you didn't know. I don't see the point of these sales figures arguments that people like to throw out so much.
The more iphones out there = more developers creating great apps for us. I care about their sales because it results in a very healthy app store with apps for virtually anything I need.
Apple has an app store that Google envies. It is because Apple has a huge engaged user base that actually spends money on apps.
The more iphones out there = more developers creating great apps for us. I care about their sales because it results in a very healthy app store with apps for virtually anything I need.
Apple has an app store that Google envies. It is because Apple has a huge engaged user base that actually spends money on apps.
it doesn't just have to do with text reflow. mobile apps make a more usable version.Yeah, like a separate app for every website you visit because your browser doesn't support text reflow. For some people, all those apps aren't important.
Why should any consumer care about how much products Apple or any other company sold? More sales does not make it a better product, in case you didn't know. I don't see the point of these sales figures arguments that people like to throw out so much.
So feel free to echo this statement every time our resident Android Propaganda Machine posts some iOS vs Android sales figure or Android marketshare numbers. Who cares right? It doesn't matter at all.Why should any consumer care about how much products Apple or any other company sold? More sales does not make it a better product, in case you didn't know. I don't see the point of these sales figures arguments that people like to throw out so much.
So feel free to echo this statement every time our resident Android Propaganda Machine posts some iOS vs Android sales figure or Android marketshare numbers. Who cares right? It doesn't matter at all.
Troubling news. Apple pretty much re-released iPhone 4 and it is selling as cakes. Looks like hardware specs do not nearly matter as much as user experience. Google and partners have been very slow with ICS, which was supposed to be an answer.
The 4S destroys the competition in benchmarks and you are saying they simply rereleased the 4? LOL.
Troubling news. Apple pretty much re-released iPhone 4 and it is selling as cakes. Looks like hardware specs do not nearly matter as much as user experience. Google and partners have been very slow with ICS, which was supposed to be an answer.
Except the 4S is easily the most powerful smartphone out there. A5's GPU destroys the Android competition. . . it's literally about twice as fast as its nearest competitor, the Mali 400 in the Galaxy S2.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4951/...rks-800mhz-a5-slightly-slower-gpu-than-ipad-2
Sure apple just re-used the same external design. I'd hardly call it a minor upgrade though.
Troubling news. Apple pretty much re-released iPhone 4 and it is selling as cakes. Looks like hardware specs do not nearly matter as much as user experience. Google and partners have been very slow with ICS, which was supposed to be an answer.
For instance, I love the Galaxy Note concept, but why in the hell did they give it capacitive buttons and not put ICS on it? Where's the Verizon LTE version? Why in the hell did they put a stylus in it? Why the slow intro into the US market?
Troubling news? lol, this isn't the coming of the Apocalypse.
The 4S was easily the most powerful phone when it was released and it still is currently.
Clarification, the GPU in the A5 isn't an Apple designed part. Its PowerVR's SX543MP2, available for any manufacturer to use.
The A5 itself is competing on the same level as OMAP4, Exynos, etc. The CPUs perform within ~10% of each other usually.
The gpu is fast but the cpu and ram are quite mediocre. I'm surprised the gpu matters so much to Apple fans, becase if so you all must have thought the iPhone 4 was severely underpowered since the Galaxy S had a considerably faster gpu.
They didn't give it ICS for obvious reasons, the software necessary to support the stylus takes time to integrate into Android and they obviously didn't have time to do that and launch the phone on schedule. Besides the phone is excellent on Gingerbread anyways.
The reason it has a stylus should be pretty clear, it is called the Note after all. Besides the stylus was one of the features people like most about it, despite what Steve Jobs thought a stylus can be a great tool to improve productivity.
Surely you of all people know how the U.S. cell market works, there won't be a Verizon LTE version unless Verizon wants one.
The overall performance margin from the Galaxy S/iPhone4 wasn't nearly as large as the iPhone 4S. Aside from that, real world performance of the Galaxy S....was...mediocre.
I was impressed by the Hummingbird, don't get me wrong on that. However, people spreading fud about how the 4S not having powerful hardware is completely false
Sure, but only Apple has used it so far. No other smartphone (or tablet, for that matter) has even come close to that level of GPU performance. Whether it's because Apple were able to get their SOC into production more quickly, or maybe other SOC manufacturers didn't want to pay the licensing fee for PowerVR's more advanced GPU designs, I don't know. But I still give credit to Apple for putting a ridiculously powerful SOC in their smartphone.
The "A5 itself" is a system-on-a-chip, which includes the CPU AND GPU (as well as a bunch of other stuff like radios, IO controllers, etc.)