Oyeve
Lifer
- Oct 18, 1999
- 22,071
- 885
- 126
The only flaw, imo, is no pure white. Other than that I love my sgs2 screen.Samsung does not have that market cornered and it's flaws are obvious when you look at it.
The only flaw, imo, is no pure white. Other than that I love my sgs2 screen.Samsung does not have that market cornered and it's flaws are obvious when you look at it.
Drawings are nice, but is there a display that size with the increased resolution to keep the "Retina Display" tag? And can it be mass produced for release this year?
Samsung does not have that market cornered and it's flaws are obvious when you look at it.
I just looked up the numbers again. It wasn't 95%. It is 90%. In what world does 90% not equal total market domination? Things can change but as it stands now, Samsung owns AMOLED market.
![]()
First line is Samsung.
I have no idea if there's a 3.8" LCD part ready to order. You can bet any components supplier wants to get in bed with Apple.Drawings are nice, but is there a display that size with the increased resolution to keep the "Retina Display" tag? And can it be mass produced for release this year?
If I want 1280 pixels wide, it does me no good on 3.5" because text size is too small -high dots per inch. DPI number for iPhone 4S is really large, over 300, and it has to go even larger if they keep same size and increase resolution. It is so high that eye can no longer see pixels.2 years ago all I heard from people was "people want bigger screens on a cell phone, anything smaller than a 4" really won't do well" last year "non 4g/LTE phones suck, people don't want 3G phones anymore" I bet the next iPhone will have a 3.5" screen and possibly no 4G/LTE but it'll still be the best selling handset on the market. Maybe I'm in the minority but I love my 3.2" LG phone. I scratch my head at people who claim they can't read web pages on anything less than 4-4.5" my vision's not the best and on a 3.2" I can read shit perfectly
*shrug*
If I want 1280 pixels wide, it does me no good on 3.5" because text size is too small -high dots per inch. DPI number for iPhone 4S is really large, over 300, and it has to go even larger if they keep same size and increase resolution. It is so high that eye can no longer see pixels.
For example, two phones that have 1280x720 resolution, Rezound and Nexus, have higher or similar DPI, and they are 4.35" and 4.7" respectively.
it is hard to look fly holding a small television up to your ear.
my real point is, y'all think the iphone will go to a bigger screen because that's the way to make it "better".
I am saying that is totally conventional thinking, which doesn't always, or even often, turn out to be the direction markets and desirability really go.
making something is bigger is a designer saying, 'I have no real skills, but maybe if we make it bigger, shinier, etc, it will fly.'
I'm saying that hasn't been apple's forte, so why would they start now ?
A bigger screen is better. Ask anyone using a large monitor if they'd ever go back to a smaller one - I definitely wouldn't, even if the smaller monitor had the same of slightly higher resolution.
You don't have to hold a monitor in your hand.
Apple probably spends more money than HTC, Samsung, and Motorola combined on usability focus groups. If a bigger screen was important, they would build a phone with a bigger screen. Due to the most recent sales figures, it is obvious that screen size isn't a high priority for the majority of consumers.
This whole debate is going to seem silly when the next iPhone is 4". But them I'm sure that will be the "perfect" size.
According to the Jobs biography, Apple doesn't spend a dime on focus groups.You don't have to hold a monitor in your hand.
Apple probably spends more money than HTC, Samsung, and Motorola combined on usability focus groups. If a bigger screen was important, they would build a phone with a bigger screen. Due to the most recent sales figures, it is obvious that screen size isn't a high priority for the majority of consumers.
Apple probably spends more money than HTC, Samsung, and Motorola combined on usability focus groups.
According to the Jobs biography, Apple doesn't spend a dime on focus groups.
Hence the whole cult mentality.
According to the Jobs biography, Apple doesn't spend a dime on focus groups.
It's silly to discuss display sizes on a thread about Apple's record profits. Polls indicate majority of iphone users would like a bigger screen but the iphone is too hot not to compromise for that minor issue. Over a million people went to great lengths to get the iphone on T-Mobile and many switched carriers just to have it, a minor niggle about screen size won't stop them from buying iphone.
IOS ecosystem is more profitable than competition, ipad 2 has been selling itself pretty much all alone in the high margin/high end segment. The platform and apps are more mature, efficient and polished than Android, despite the latter closing the gap fast over the past year and a half or so.
A5 dominated 2011 on the hardware side and looks set to keep the lead until it successor is out. The closest competitor was Samsung with it's SGS2 all others faded into background.
I expected Android to have a stronger push with the hardware because it needed it to compensate for the raw OS and because all the major SoC houses were lined up vs. Apple on their home turf.
So far there has only been one serious challenger to Apple, no other came as close to putting a whole package together like as Samsung did with SGS2.
No telling how others will do this year but at least Samsung is all set to repeat last year's successes. That new Tab with the Exynos 5250 and the sick display/resolution combo will be priced like XOOM initially but unlike that pos, it will be worth it.
SOC is not going to justify $600+pricing when tablet sweet spot is $300.
