A thread about Christianity

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

petrek

Senior member
Apr 11, 2001
953
0
0
Want to list some verses that say drinking, homosexuality, and profanity are wrong? To me it seems like the Bible is open to interpretation.

Yes, wording, no matter how clear, can be used to say the opposite based on pronunciation. The reality as to God's view of drinking, homosexuality, and profanity are very clear unless of course one enjoys doing any or all of those worldly activities, in which case one can, and most likely will justify that behavior by perverting the word of God.

Dave
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
How is Christians spreading their beliefs any different that Republicans and Democrats spreading theirs?
Politico's don't do it by buggering Altar Boys!
 

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81
Originally posted by: petrek
Want to list some verses that say drinking, homosexuality, and profanity are wrong? To me it seems like the Bible is open to interpretation.

Yes, wording, no matter how clear, can be used to say the opposite based on pronunciation. The reality as to God's view of drinking, homosexuality, and profanity are very clear unless of course one enjoys doing any or all of those worldly activities, in which case one can, and most likely will justify that behavior by perverting the word of God.

Dave

That doesn't answer my question.
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Originally posted by: luv2chill
Originally posted by: Millennium
Want to list some verses that say drinking, homosexuality, and profanity are wrong? To me it seems like the Bible is open to interpretation.
...and no Leviticus quotes!!

l2c

Why not? Where does it say that the Old Testament doesn't apply anymore?

I am a practicing Christian, although my church attendance has not been the greatest lately (mostly due to work). I went to the Indianapolis 500 this year, and as I was walking back to my car there were some fundies standing on milk crates with bullhorns yelling at us and telling us we're all going to hell. That made me very embarrassed to be a Christian. They knew NOTHING about the people they were talking to. Obviously it pissed off a lot of drunks, but I think that's the reaction they WANTED. Blessed are the persecuted - I think that's in Matthew 5. Unfortunately they're NOT helping the cause of Christianity one bit.

Edit:
1 Corinthians 6:9-10 - Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterous nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. (NIV)

Edit: I DO think that the word "drunkards" in that verse is open to some interpretation. It could refer to anyone who gets drunk, or just to people who do it frequently.
 

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
16
81
Originally posted by: petrek
Want to list some verses that say drinking, homosexuality, and profanity are wrong? To me it seems like the Bible is open to interpretation.

Yes, wording, no matter how clear, can be used to say the opposite based on pronunciation. The reality as to God's view of drinking, homosexuality, and profanity are very clear unless of course one enjoys doing any or all of those worldly activities, in which case one can, and most likely will justify that behavior by perverting the word of God.

Dave

Forgive me for I am not a Bible scholar, but here's a question: What exactly is God's view of such? Homosexuality is a preference, not an action; it is what one is, rather than what one does. If someone is born homosexual, with an orientation towards finding one's own gender sexually attractive, did not God create that person in that fashion? Is it acceptable to be homosexual and never engage in sexual activity, or to be homosexual and engage in unfulfilling sexual activity with members of the opposite sex (and thus cause that individual to not be as happy in life as he could be)?

And drinking... Where do you draw the line? Alcohol is a chemical compound that has certain effects on the body and mind both positive and negative. There are health benefits associated with drinking a small amount on a regular basis. On the other extreme, there can be alcoholism and violent behavior, both obviously negative.
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Originally posted by: Millennium
That's awfully nice of the Bible to give Female prostitutes a pass.

I meant to add a comment that that is not a comprehensive list, nor is it the only verse in the Bible that deals with that sort of thing. I'm sure prostitution is mentioned in the Bible - probably in Leviticus. That was just the first verse I found in the back of my Bible.

Forgive me for I am not a Bible scholar, but here's a question: What exactly is God's view of such? Homosexuality is a preference, not an action; it is what one is, rather than what one does. If someone is born homosexual, with an orientation towards finding one's own gender sexually attractive, did not God create that person in that fashion? Is it acceptable to be homosexual and never engage in sexual activity, or to be homosexual and engage in unfulfilling sexual activity with members of the opposite sex (and thus cause that individual to not be as happy in life as he could be)?

Well, first of all, lust is a sin. So a man lusting after another man would be a sin just like a man lusting after a woman is. Obviously this is something that you don't have much control over, so it's a good thing God forgives sin pretty easily. ;) Engaging in homosexual relations is a sin (IMHO), but I'm not sure about just "being" a homosexual without acting on it.

And drinking... Where do you draw the line? Alcohol is a chemical compound that has certain effects on the body and mind both positive and negative. There are health benefits associated with drinking a small amount on a regular basis. On the other extreme, there can be alcoholism and violent behavior, both obviously negative.

Drinking alcohol is not a sin in and of itself. Jesus's first miracle was changing water to wine. I'm not sure where exactly the line is drawn. Obviously it's not written in the Bible that a blood alcohol level of .08% constitutes sin. I'm not even certain that any single instance of being intoxicated would be a sin. But I do think the Bible is at least clear that alcoholism is a sin.
 

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
16
81
Originally posted by: mugsywwiii
Originally posted by: Millennium
That's awfully nice of the Bible to give Female prostitutes a pass.

I meant to add a comment that that is not a comprehensive list, nor is it the only verse in the Bible that deals with that sort of thing. I'm sure prostitution is mentioned in the Bible - probably in Leviticus. That was just the first verse I found in the back of my Bible.

Forgive me for I am not a Bible scholar, but here's a question: What exactly is God's view of such? Homosexuality is a preference, not an action; it is what one is, rather than what one does. If someone is born homosexual, with an orientation towards finding one's own gender sexually attractive, did not God create that person in that fashion? Is it acceptable to be homosexual and never engage in sexual activity, or to be homosexual and engage in unfulfilling sexual activity with members of the opposite sex (and thus cause that individual to not be as happy in life as he could be)?

Well, first of all, lust is a sin. So a man lusting after another man would be a sin just like a man lusting after a woman is. Obviously this is something that you don't have much control over, so it's a good thing God forgives sin pretty easily. ;) Engaging in homosexual relations is a sin (IMHO), but I'm not sure about just "being" a homosexual without acting on it.

And drinking... Where do you draw the line? Alcohol is a chemical compound that has certain effects on the body and mind both positive and negative. There are health benefits associated with drinking a small amount on a regular basis. On the other extreme, there can be alcoholism and violent behavior, both obviously negative.

Drinking alcohol is not a sin in and of itself. Jesus's first miracle was changing water to wine. I'm not sure where exactly the line is drawn. Obviously it's not written in the Bible that a blood alcohol level of .08% constitutes sin. I'm not even certain that any single instance of being intoxicated would be a sin. But I do think the Bible is at least clear that alcoholism is a sin.

Your post is an excellent example that the Bible is open to interpretation. "What does God mean by..?" Much depends on the attitudes of those who read the Bible, and perhaps those who translated it.
 

petrek

Senior member
Apr 11, 2001
953
0
0
That doesn't answer my question.

I was under the impression you are already aware of verses associated with those issues. I'll look some of them up and post them for you.

Dave
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Your post is an excellent example that the Bible is open to interpretation. "What does God mean by..?" Much depends on the attitudes of those who read the Bible, and perhaps those who translated it.

Yeah, as long as you don't get too liberal with your interpretation. I believe that the Bible was meant to be read literally; I think most Bible scholars agree. But like I said in this particular case, I'm not entirely sure what is meant by "drunkard." It is very possible that going back to the original Greek text may help with the interpretation, because there could be a distinction in Greek between occassional drunkenness and alcoholism. Unfortunately I do not read Greek. People who dedicate their lives to studying the Bible DO learn to read it in the original languages (Hebrew, Greek, Aramaic) and would be in a better possition to offer interpretation than I am. But like I said, I think you need to interpret the Bible as literally as possible. If it's very clear about something ("Thou shalt not murder"), you can't very well interpret that how you please.
 

Legendary

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2002
7,019
1
0
I think the destruction of Sodom and Gammorah (spelling?) implies God's unhappiness with homosexuality.
 

Orsorum

Lifer
Dec 26, 2001
27,631
5
81
Originally posted by: AvesPKS
What is a hell house?

A tactic used by some churches to scare people, usually teens, into repenting and accepting Christianity. They basically put on plays about what happens to sinners (in hell).
 

BatmanNate

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
12,444
2
81
Here is my basic take on Christianity copy/pasted from my post in reitz's "deconversion" thread:


I suppose the only place to start would be to paint somewhat of a picture of my childhood. I was raised by two parents who had been religious their entire lives, raised by two sets of grandparents who were as well. I'm not talking about just on Sundays and not in a strictly ceremonial fashion, but I believe that they both honestly believed in what they embraced as faith and made it the basis of their lives to the best of their abilities. I grew up in a Baptist church until the age of 12 or so, where upon moving we joined the Evangelical Free denomination of church. Neither were particularly consipicuous as far as denominational deviances go, both pretty much run of the mill protestant flavor. I attended that church until I was 17, moving out on my own shortly thereafter.

What caused you to question your beliefs?

It was not so much one event in particular, but more so the culmination of a lifetime up until that point of having dwelt on the facts, the nature of the people who embraced what I believed, my own experience with God, the church, and the life that had been chosen for me up to that point, and a chain of events with the "leadership" of the church body with which I was affiliated with when my dissent began to outweigh my belief, so to speak.

Firstly, I have been a person of inquisitive nature from birth, like a child to this day in the respect that my curiousity often gets away with me. Always the asker of questions, I had tendency to pose conundrums to those, much more learned that myself in the ways of Religion and the world with questions that build the very foundation of a concrete belief system like that of a child.

Having mustered the necessary "faith" (with doubt as my predecessor) to cross the gap and simply turn a blind eye to the earlier riddles of religion that had failed to make sense to me as a child, I began grasping for an understanding of basic premises upon which my beliefs were founded. Take, for example, that which proclaims we are all born sinners, guilty from birth and predestined to stay that way, only to be redeemed by the grace of God should we accept. Several points about this philosophy bothered me, aside from the more obvious that I had conquered with feats of faith pertaining to the existence of God himself and the legitimacy of his sovreignty upon this place.

- First, the idea that we are created in God's image, yet it is destined that none should live up to his standards. From God's perspective, why? You'd have to be an egomaniac to create the sort of scenario where you have billions of impaired versions of yourself utterly dependent on you to be saved from certain death that you've made for them. Not to imply that I could ever fathom the mind of an omnipotent diety, that was just my take as a mere human. Beyond that, there is the classic debate of free will vs. predestination and I am convinced after much study that they indeed cannot coexist because they are in direct contradiction.

- Second, if our nature is to blame for our sinfulness, what does that say about God's own image? What does that say about the impact of our choices as to our character? Sin is our nature, but it is also a conscious choice we must make in order to receive punishment for it, no? And why is so much that is in our nature to be called sin? Rationally, our nature lends itself toward our survival, our procreation, and our advancement. Why call that which is seemingly virtuous our vice so to have us deny ourselves in hope that our reward lay in an afterlife we cannot be wholy assured of? Who benefits from this? Would it be wise to wish to serve a God with this agenda? The Catholic church in times long past (and perhaps some not so long past) used traits of our nature as cause for guilt, so as to govern the population as they saw fit and much destruction came of it. Why should we be guilty for something that not only we cannot change, but is logically something we should cherish and take pride in?

- Lastly on this subject, how can we accept the sacrifice of a man 2000 years ago who was without what we deem to be sin as payment for our own? How does that absolve my wickedness and my deviance should I just choose to accept something that was never mine to give? Where is my responsibility for my own?

Then, there was the perverse sense of justice that prevailed throughout everything that I knew about the God that I tried to love and fear at the same time, for we were taught to desire a personal relationship with our creator who had infinite love for us. I never questioned why God would let tradgedy happen, that was just the nature of life and part of a plan I could not see wholly nor understand. However, these ideas nagged at the back of my mind relentlessly, though I was not always aware of them their presence weighed greater on me than I knew at the time:

- There is an incalculable amount of people who have never heard the Christian gospel, because they existed before Christ, because they were geographically isolated, or simply because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time. Do all of these people go to Hell because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time?

- Expanding upon the first point, what of all the other religions, some of them strikingly similar in moral premises to Christianity, were they merely incarnations of the same to cater to those who were not privy to the the "good news" because of afformentioned issues? If so, why does one religion condemn the next? Why does the good man go to Hell and the evil man reformed not? Was the conivery of man present in the history of all these reilgions that caused them to schism into rival factions only to end up debating the unimportant details until they had atrophied into blasphemous machines that missed the entire point?

- The Bible says to rely not upon your own understanding but to trust in God. Following this train of logic, assume you are presented with 3 different religions that all tell you that, only with a different God at the head of each. If your own understanding, provided you in creation by God himself, who must have given us the power of logic, reason, epistemology, and perception, is not to be relied upon, then how am I to decide which religion is correct? They all tell me to believe blindly but without proof, I am at an impass. Why give us the basis to form knowledge logicaly if it is only to go to waste so we may play roulette with our very souls?

- On Heaven and Hell. From my personal experience, the biggest motivator in my religious life was aversion of Hell. Sure, I wanted to be like Jesus because he was a pretty cool guy and loving my neighbor was something to strive for for certain, but as they say, fear is the greatest motivator. In honest consideration, I would not really want to go to heaven either. Living enternally is something too vast for me to even contemplate, and I am not sure that I would want that "gift" were it offered to me. Life is a beautiful thing, partly so because of the perceived brevity. And were I to go to heaven, what would there be for me? If all that my body and mind which are inseperable in this place desire are denied me in heaven because they are vice, and so if I am to enter heaven I should not desire them any longer, what is my motivation? To worship someone for eternity? Selflessness looks nice at a glance but practically speaking it does not work. People look out for themselves, they work for themselves, they achieve for everything that represents themselves and what they love which is a reflection of the value of the self, so what then do we seek with an eternity of serving our brothers and our masters if not for the mere pleasure of doing so? It does not add up.

How did you arrive at atheism [edit] (or your new set of beliefs)?

The straw that broke the camel's back in my life was the administration of the church which I was a member of toward the end of my teen years. Many events took place that added to the camel's load and soiled the view of organized religion's plausible benefits in my eyes. For one, the youth pastor who had been at the church for the entire time that I had been there was a man who had earnestly earned my respect. He carried himself in a way that did not ask nor demand it, yet it was impossible for me not to. He was probably more like Jesus Christ than any other man I'd known; but he was still human. Had a good heart, was an excellent teacher, and very good at his job. He however developed feelings for one of the women who also worked in youth at that church, and although it never led to anything he was a married man. He repented this publicly to the pastor and the church and the woman involved and was forgiven by some, detested by others. He was an honest man yet he was cast out because he was trying to live what he believed and they were too blind and righteous to accept that. That allowed me to see a peice of what little faith I had in men to begin with crumble away. I began to realize that was merely a reflection of what little faith I had in the whole system which the very basis of reeked of the invention of man in the first place, but alas I did not see the whole picture then as I still probably do not.

After the youth pastor was gone, a good percentage of the congregation left with him, as they were divided over the issue and niether side was satisfied with the other's conclusion. What was left was no more than a conglamoration of modern day Pharisees now that I mull it over, and I did not fit in. They did not approve of my questions, my budding philosophy as a result of those questions, the way I dressed, the music I listened to, the people with whom I would associate (those whom Jesus had in mind when he told his buddies to become fishers of men...well, those were the men, we were the men) and most of all, my relationship with my girlfriend who also attended the church at the time. Her parents were a set of completely ignorant zealots who used the religious angle as nothing more than a crutch on which to lean in order to keep their archiac way of life and family structure inline. Sexist, racist, abusive idealists who considered themselves ordained because of the luck of the draw, you know the type. I am amazed such an amazing woman managed to grow out of that household after years of healing the damage that it caused, and I am with her still today. Back to the subject at hand, her parents and the church could not come to terms with the fact that her and I loved one another and did not intend to disband at their whim. This only made things infinitely more complicated and members of the church administrative body tended to become involved where they had no business being. More of my (and her) faith seeped away but there was nobody there to care where it was going as they all had their ulterior motives for the most part.

After that, upon graduating high school I moved out, worked hard, built a life for myself, and devoted a great deal of my time to reading and indepedent study. I will not say that I am an Atheist for I am not one to come to a conclusion which cannot be proven, I suppose Agnostic fits better but not in the cliche sense of the term. It is not a clause I put myself under to avoid the hard questions, to avoid thinking, to avoid choosing. We are little more than the sum of our choices after all. I merely hope that if there is some sort of all powerful all knowing force behind this broken mess that those of us who are meant to portray it are not accurate. I will say that logically every fibre in my body leans toward the conclusion that God is merely man's scapegoat for the results of one scheme or another gone awry, and has little more use in modern day life than to sway people politically or to give hope to those with little understanding and lots of imagination. If it works for you, more power to you but let me tell you brother I've been there and I earnestly tried with every drop of blood in my viens to seek what there was to be sought and I came away empty.

What was the transition like? Was it stressful? Was it difficult? Was it a long, drawn-out process, or a quick epiphany?

Long perhaps. Strenuous emotionally at times. Not completely over with for better or for worse. I would not change a thing in hindsight however.

How did your family, friends, and loved-ones react to your newfound [dis]belief?

My better half was very understanding as she is at perhaps a different place of the same journey herself partly as a result of our shared experience and partly as a result of her's growing up. We do the best to support one another and I try as honestly as I know how to answer her questions in the matter. She has become a very mature person and none the less loving for certain as a result of shying away from long held beliefs. My friends are for the most part open minded if they don't share similar beliefs which many don't and we generally have discussions that we both come away from the better as a result of it. My immediate family on the other hand, I never told them directly of my decisions in this matter, although it is no doubt my life reflects it in many ways. They must know, but they are probably afraid to admit it as it might seem to be failure on their part, however I feel it is the opposite. They helped me keep a level head growing up, and I'm using it. I think they will understand one day. Perhaps this life has worked for them and that is what matters.

How has it impacted your outlook on life?

Vastly is the only way I have of describing it. I thought I'd become more of a cynic but since I've always been such a cynic that hasn't really changed. Everything else has, though. I have hope now that I hadn't before. I have confidence in myself that I had not previously known. I realize that I love my life, I enjoy it immensly, and that is not worth trading in for a life of misery in hopes that the afterlife will see me in a better position. I rely on myself and that is enough. I give faith no longer, but trust on a value for value basis. I realize that dissent is not by nature something to fear and to forget, but to embrace and dig for the root of. I also understand now that I can not hold contradicting ideas in my mind without being mislead as to the premise of one or the other, for contradictions do not occur naturally. That gives me a great deal of peace of mind, and I celebrate that mind not as a gift but as something that I have earned of my own accord.

This has probably been my longest post ever on these forums and I hope only that it can help one of you. I do not aim to change you or to make you like me, this is just my expereince and how it has worked for me, take it as you will for whatever it is worth. Good thread, reitz.



 

Blain

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
23,643
3
81
I like the Amplified Bible for pulling out word for word meanings.
The original sentance structure isn't easy for modern readers. But, if you take your time you can follow the text pretty well.

One note about the "King James" version (which version year?). The King James version around today isn't the same KJ version that started out.

The 1611 "King James" version began as a revision of "The Bishops Bible" (1568). Then it was revised in 1629, 1638, 1762 and 1769.
Words in italics were not part of the original Textus Receptus.

:D
 

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
16
81
Originally posted by: mugsywwiii
Your post is an excellent example that the Bible is open to interpretation. "What does God mean by..?" Much depends on the attitudes of those who read the Bible, and perhaps those who translated it.

Yeah, as long as you don't get too liberal with your interpretation. I believe that the Bible was meant to be read literally; I think most Bible scholars agree. But like I said in this particular case, I'm not entirely sure what is meant by "drunkard." It is very possible that going back to the original Greek text may help with the interpretation, because there could be a distinction in Greek between occassional drunkenness and alcoholism. Unfortunately I do not read Greek. People who dedicate their lives to studying the Bible DO learn to read it in the original languages (Hebrew, Greek, Aramaic) and would be in a better possition to offer interpretation than I am. But like I said, I think you need to interpret the Bible as literally as possible. If it's very clear about something ("Thou shalt not murder"), you can't very well interpret that how you please.

But, you see, even "Thou shalt not murder" is open to interpretation. First of all, you have to go back to the original Greek/Hebrew/Aramaic to determine exactly what was said (be it "murder" or "kill" or whatever), and then determine what "kill" or "murder" means. Not only do concepts and ideas get lost in translation (and new ones made up depending on the political agenda of whoever's sponsoring the translation), but the meanings of words themselves can change over time.
 

Vonkhan

Diamond Member
Feb 27, 2003
8,198
0
71
To get a taste of how accepting most Christians are, wear a pentacle (on a necklace, or a T-shirt with its logo) and walk upto an average house, ring the doorbell and ask if u can use their phone, get directions, whatever ;)
 

Woodchuck2000

Golden Member
Jan 20, 2002
1,632
1
0
Originally posted by: petrek
King James Bible. Word for word translation from original Hebrew and Greek.

Dave
The king james' translation is hardly word for word. Ask a greek or hebrew scholar - there are a number of mis-translations which support the dogma of the time. Look at young's literal translation if you want word-for-word version (which, to be fair, doesn't scan very well as it <is> word for word and thus translates idioms and the like literally rather than substituting english ones.)
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
But, you see, even "Thou shalt not murder" is open to interpretation. First of all, you have to go back to the original Greek/Hebrew/Aramaic to determine exactly what was said (be it "murder" or "kill" or whatever), and then determine what "kill" or "murder" means. Not only do concepts and ideas get lost in translation (and new ones made up depending on the political agenda of whoever's sponsoring the translation), but the meanings of words themselves can change over time.

Yeah, but like I said, you can't get too liberal with the interpretation. You can't twist "thou shalt not murder" to mean much other than intentionally taking the life of an innocent human being. Other passages make it clear that killing animals, killing in war, killing in self-defense, or killing a person who has committed certain crimes is ok. Obviously vigilantism is not legal, and the Bible also teaches to respect the secular law, but I believe state-sponsored executions would not be sin. So in light of the rest of the Bible, "murder" means exactly what you'd probably expect it to mean, and nothing else. People try to twist the words of the Bible to fit their purposes, but that's not how it was intended to be used.

Please feel free to pick a verse and give any interpretation you like, and I'll see if I can refute your interpretation. :)
 

GoingUp

Lifer
Jul 31, 2002
16,720
1
71
Well I started another thread of my own, but I'll move it in here, seein as how it only got 3 stupid replys...

Socrates asked "Is conduct right because god commands it, or does god command it because it is right?"
 

GoingUp

Lifer
Jul 31, 2002
16,720
1
71
Originally posted by: gopunk
Originally posted by: Dual700s
To chime in- What I have always been taught, and believe, is that if you truely wish to convert someone, you must live a life true to the beliefs you profess. This is a similar thought to St. Paul's "Faith without works is dead."

Many Christian fundimentalists who subscribe to "Faith alone" teachings criticize Catholics for believing that faith AND good works are neccessary. But what St. Paul, and the Church is teaching is that if you truely have faith, you will live it everyday, and as a neccesary product of your faith, you will do good works.

If we "love each other as Christ loves the Church", than we will offer food to the hungry, clothing to the naked, and shelter to the homeless irregardless of thier profession of faith or lack there-of.

I do know atheists that are better "Christians" than "Christians." There is a vast difference between TELLING everyone you've been saved, and LIVING a life FULL of Christ-like love and selflessness.

this reminded me of a comic i saw the other day:
http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0041/0041_01.asp

kind of scary, huh? i thought the comic was a joke at first...


Must be a Lutheran comic. Martin Luther was the one who believed in salvation by faith alone. He didn't believe that ones actions got them into heaven.
 

GtPrOjEcTX

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
10,784
6
81
Originally posted by: Gobadgrs
Originally posted by: gopunk
Originally posted by: Dual700s
To chime in- What I have always been taught, and believe, is that if you truely wish to convert someone, you must live a life true to the beliefs you profess. This is a similar thought to St. Paul's "Faith without works is dead."

Many Christian fundimentalists who subscribe to "Faith alone" teachings criticize Catholics for believing that faith AND good works are neccessary. But what St. Paul, and the Church is teaching is that if you truely have faith, you will live it everyday, and as a neccesary product of your faith, you will do good works.

If we "love each other as Christ loves the Church", than we will offer food to the hungry, clothing to the naked, and shelter to the homeless irregardless of thier profession of faith or lack there-of.

I do know atheists that are better "Christians" than "Christians." There is a vast difference between TELLING everyone you've been saved, and LIVING a life FULL of Christ-like love and selflessness.

this reminded me of a comic i saw the other day:
http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0041/0041_01.asp

kind of scary, huh? i thought the comic was a joke at first...


Must be a Lutheran comic. Martin Luther was the one who believed in salvation by faith alone. He didn't believe that ones actions got them into heaven.
actually that comic is almost correct. except for the acceptting Jesus and be saved part. you have to be baptized as well as was the example of Christians in the early Church.

example

Me: I'll give you $100
You: Cool.
Me: You have to go to the bank to get it.
You: But you said you'd give it to me. Do I get it if I don't go to the bank?
Me: No, I said I'd give you $100, but a step to receiving it is going to the bank. If you don't go to the bank you won't get it.

Parallel to:

God: If you believe, I'll give you salvation
Me: Cool
God: You have to believe and be baptized to be saved.
Me: But you said if I believe I'd get salvation. Don't I get it if I don't get baptized?
God: No, but baptizism is a step to getting the salvation. If you don't get baptized you won't get saved.
 

dfi

Golden Member
Apr 20, 2001
1,213
0
0
I don't have a problem with reglious people. I am also not opposed to the idea that there is a god. At this point I simply have not found enough evidence of it.

I've been to church and study groups on a regular basis when I was younger. I've noticed that church is more of a place to socialize for many people. Whether or not you are religious, if you surround yourself with religious people it is much easier to become religious.

What I find most curious about the religious people I've talked to is their intense faith, and yet their total inability to justify their faith. Their logic is very circular: I believe and therefore it exists, it exists and therefore I believe. Indeed, faith defies justification or any logic. In a time when we have changed the widespread view that the earth is flat, in a time where we have discredited the religious belief of the greeks, in a time where theories are useless without scientific proof, I find it amusing that people think their beliefs have any bearing in or on reality.

The fact that most religion condemns nonbelievers to an afterlife of misery is at least a point of annoyance to nonbelievers. The condescending attitude of "I will save you from your own ignorance" is also a point of annoyance.

dfi