Zorba
Lifer
You signed a contract to pay off your debt. The government then gave you money to help pay it off. The difference there is your contract was with a random third party, not the government.Yes that is the same thing... NOT. 🙄
You signed a contract to pay off your debt. The government then gave you money to help pay it off. The difference there is your contract was with a random third party, not the government.Yes that is the same thing... NOT. 🙄
"lived in government housing" why'd she get free housing? I don't get free housing, she should've been on the street! /sLol Almost word for word and could have been summed up with: FYGM
How exactly is getting thousands discounted off of your taxes for mortgage interest different than getting a discount on your student loan? Except you get one and someone else gets the other? Sure one is an indirect discount, but it is functionally the same. Why should my taxes go towards paying for you to buy a house you can't afford? I paid off my mortgage in 2 years and never got a penny of tax deduction from it, so you shouldn't either. FYGM.Definitely not the same thing. Now if the President wants to forgive $10,000 or $20,000 on my mortgage...or on my truck loan, that would be more comparable...and I'd be fine with it.
Definitely not the same thing. Now if the President wants to forgive $10,000 or $20,000 on my mortgage...or on my truck loan, that would be more comparable...and I'd be fine with it.
How exactly is getting thousands discounted off of your taxes for mortgage interest different than getting a discount on your student loan? Except you get one and the someone else gets the other? Sure one is an indirect discount, but it is functionally the same. Why should my taxes go towards paying for you to buy a house you can't afford? I paid off my mortgage in 2 years and never got a penny of tax deduction from it, so you shouldn't either. FYGM.
Yea, or… Pelosi.... Covid can't touch this 'cause vaccinated?![]()
Back to the actual thread topic (which some are clearly uncomfortable with): Trumpism, election denialism, and RINO-ism all got their freakin asses kicked last Tuesday. And the Republicans lost a midterm election that, with an unpopular Dem President in office and a weak economy, should have been an absolute landslide for them.
What went wrong?
Oh what horse shit. If you are not going to repay the loan then don't sign for it.
You make it sound like the Boomers all got a free college education. Most of the kids I graduated with didn't go to college. You want to know why? They couldn't afford it and were smart enough to know they couldn't. They also had the integrity to not sign up for loan they couldn't repay. College was cheaper back then, but so was everything else. The wages weren't much either. Yeah I remember rocking with my 3,000 dollar a year job. I joined the Navy to get an education to get better pay.
Beat me to it came here to say"lived in government housing" why'd she get free housing? I don't get free housing, she should've been on the street! /s
Also ate from a garden someone else planted. Lots of socialism described in that tweet."lived in government housing" why'd she get free housing? I don't get free housing, she should've been on the street! /s
So you've always been retired? Difference in interest and principle is meaningless, you could immediately take your discount and pay off principle with it.First...mortgage interest and property tax deductions do nothing to refuce your mirtgage principle. The student loan forgiveness program does.
As for me, I'm retired, don't have enough taxable income to even have to file, let alone to make itemizing my deductions make sense...so I basically "throw away" thousands of dollars every year in mortgage interest and property tax deductions.
What else ya got?
Lots of “Fuck You Got Mine”Also ate from a garden someone else planted. Lots of socialism described in that tweet.
Alright, let's get this back on track, look at what i just saw, and have a good laugh at this prospect
Yeah by her logic, "I'm not responsible for your family not being able to afford a home"..."lived in government housing" why'd she get free housing? I don't get free housing, she should've been on the street! /s
Yeah by her logic, "I'm not responsible for your family not being able to afford a home"...
Guess she's a socialist for using all those handouts. Hope she feels icky 😀
If we give them help with student loans they will just blow the savings on avocado toast.This seems pretty relevant for the old folks complaining that young people may get a helping hand on their student loans:
This seems pretty relevant for the old folks complaining that young people may get a helping hand on their student loans:
That’s probably what annoys me most - boomers had a very active role and are now like ‘who, me?’Basic "Generation who actively made housing and higher education super expensive so that younger people can't afford them without ruinous debt has thoughts about fairness" stuff.
That’s probably what annoys me most - boomers had a very active role and are now like ‘who, me?’
Since you are quoting legalize, how does any state have standing to being this suit?You don't know shit. LOL
What I have an issue with is Biden bypassing the House that controls the purse strings and spending to the tune of 400 Billion Dollars or more. He doesn't have the authority to do this because it is illegal as stated by the Texas Federal Court.
“The program is thus an unconstitutional exercise of Congress’s legislative power and must be vacated,” wrote Judge Mark Pittman, who was nominated by then-President Donald Trump. “In this country, we are not ruled by an all-powerful executive with a pen and a phone,” he continued.
And
A lawsuit brought by six Republican-led states is pending at the 8th US Circuit Court of Appeals. On October 21, that appeals court put an administrative hold on the program, banning the administration from canceling any debt. The appeals court then granted a preliminary injunction request from the states on November 14. The injunction will “remain in effect until further order of this court or the Supreme Court of the United States,” according to the order.
We are discussing the President's authority to divert funds so the comparison is appropriateWe are not discussing Trump or his wall which is a completely different subject.