Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
I take back all of the bad things I've been saying about Paul Pierce.
Originally posted by: vi edit
Miller took a hell of a pop to the mouth. I think he even lost a tooth. If he steps up and hits both of these he'll have free beers in any bar in Chicago when he gets home.
![]()
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: jjsole
Allen tried to do a 'john stockton' on 7-footer Miller, lol. With 5 fouls already, what a moron!
Lame double foul imho.
Originally posted by: zerocool84
DA TROOF!!!!!!
Originally posted by: Baked
LMAO, Rondo just bitch slapped Miller. That's a flagrant!
Originally posted by: vi edit
Miller took a hell of a pop to the mouth. I think he even lost a tooth. If he steps up and hits both of these he'll have free beers in any bar in Chicago when he gets home.
![]()
Cleveland swept LA 2-0 the season before. I guess then that makes the Cavs a better team in '07 than the Lakers...right?Originally posted by: OCguy
Did you miss the game in Cleveland this year?Originally posted by: KnightBreed
Nobody gives a shit who won the regular season MVP if you win the title. Hence even then it's still meaningless. Hence your original point of Kobe for MPV is also meaningless. Doubly so since they aren't going to beat Cleveland.![]()
It wasn't any more flagrant than the foul that Rondo put on Miller. Dwight was trying to shake Dalembert off after a pretty blatant hold. I don't think his intent was to land an elbow, just like I don't belive it was Rondo's intent to rake Miller across the mouth, even though he was nowhere close to the ball.Originally posted by: Flipped Gazelle
Dwight Howard went for 24/24.
I just saw the replay of him throwing that elbow at Dalembert... now *that* was a flagrant foul!
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
It wasn't any more flagrant than the foul that Rondo put on Miller. Dwight was trying to shake Dalembert off after a pretty blatant hold. I don't think his intent was to land an elbow, just like I don't belive it was Rondo's intent to rake Miller across the mouth, even though he was nowhere close to the ball.Originally posted by: Flipped Gazelle
Dwight Howard went for 24/24.
I just saw the replay of him throwing that elbow at Dalembert... now *that* was a flagrant foul!
Dwight didn't draw blood.
Originally posted by: dbk
If that was Lebron or Kobe instead of Brad Miller that would've been a flagrant foul.
Miller should've stayed down on the ground.
then again - Kobe or Lebron would've dunked the ball so...oh well
best series of the playoffs
I don't think Rondo was going for the ball. He was trying to prevent Miller from going up and tried to grab whatever was within reach. It just happened to be Miller's face. The way he hooked his hand around was telling. A bunch of us watched in slow-mo on the DVR a number of times after it happened and we all came to the same conclusion.Originally posted by: Flipped Gazelle
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
It wasn't any more flagrant than the foul that Rondo put on Miller. Dwight was trying to shake Dalembert off after a pretty blatant hold. I don't think his intent was to land an elbow, just like I don't belive it was Rondo's intent to rake Miller across the mouth, even though he was nowhere close to the ball.Originally posted by: Flipped Gazelle
Dwight Howard went for 24/24.
I just saw the replay of him throwing that elbow at Dalembert... now *that* was a flagrant foul!
Dwight didn't draw blood.
Whether or not blood is drawn is irrelevant... Rondo looked like he was going for the ball, but too late. Howard had already most disengaged from Dalembert, and then slashed at him with his elbow. There's a big difference in a hand flapping in someone's face and a hard elbow driven by a muscular arm being driven into someone's head. Dalembert didn't do a good enough acting job...
Of course, IMO, flagrant fouls are issued too frequently, just like technicals.
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
But Rondo will likely get off unharmed while Howard may have to sit out a game. Hard to say though. David Stern was at the Magic game tonight so he may have a different opinion of things.
Agreed. I could see a fine. Wasn't exactly kosher, but it's not suspension-worthy either.Originally posted by: Flipped Gazelle
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
But Rondo will likely get off unharmed while Howard may have to sit out a game. Hard to say though. David Stern was at the Magic game tonight so he may have a different opinion of things.
Since Howard wasn't issued a flagrant, the NBA should not be able to retroactively suspend him. AFAIK, the NBA doesn't consider an "elbow" to be the equivalent of a "punch".
Maybe he'll be fined.
