20 Years and it all goes to s*. Climate Change. Hossenfelder.

[Muse]

Because it was regulated. By the govt.

We've known about climate change for an actual century. The science has been established, there's no political will to change.

There's a lot of that political will in California. It has a lot to do with the fact that gasoline costs something like $1.00 more per gallon here than the national average. Not just to keep people out of their cars but to make the gas burn cleaner.

Why does California gasoline cost more?

California gasoline costs more than in most other states primarily due to its unique, stricter environmental regulations that require a special gasoline blend to reduce air pollution, combined with higher state taxes on gasoline compared to other states, making it more expensive to produce and distribute within the state; this also contributes to California's "fuel island" status where most gasoline consumed is refined within the state, making it more vulnerable to supply disruptions from refinery issues.


Key factors contributing to higher California gas prices:

• Special gasoline blend:
  California mandates a specific gasoline formula designed to reduce smog, which is more costly to produce than standard gasoline blends.
  
  
  
• High state taxes:
  California has some of the highest gasoline taxes in the country.
  
  
  
• Limited refinery capacity:
  Most of the gasoline consumed in California is refined within the state, which can lead to price fluctuations if there are refinery outages.
  
  
  
• Environmental program costs:
  The state's stringent environmental regulations, like the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS), add to the cost of gasoline.
  
  
  
• "Fuel island" status:
  Due to geographic isolation, transporting gasoline into California from other regions can be more expensive.

 

[Red Squirrel]

If you're even partially on solar, you aren't the problem. Nobody is targeting you. Nobody gives a fuck about you.

The problems with climate change are way, way above your pay grade. If every man, woman, and child on the planet was actually living in pods eating bugs, it still wouldn't help as much as you'd expect. Energy generation, goods transportation, the co2 already emitted, and the chain reactions we're about to experience are the problem.

Yes this is correct. I've been saying this for a while, but then get accused for just blaming someone else and being a climate change denier.

Reality is we need large scale changes more than anything, then everything else would fall into place.

 

[MtnMan]

Uh, wasn't fusion displaying over the top sarcasm? I mean pet eating with a side dish of global warming denialism. OK, it wasn't terribly witty but wasn't serious.
- - - -
No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it. - Albert Einstein

I see that now, as others have pointed out.

My initial reaction was based on content without noting the source, combined with the fact I am so completely DONE with these mouth breathing Trump supporters that are too stupid to see they just tanked the next decade to economic and social ruin.

They won't even figure it out when they have to sell their trucks, and boats, and other toys because the Trump fucked everyone except a handful of billionaires.

 

[brycejones]

Yes this is correct. I've been saying this for a while, but then get accused for just blaming someone else and being a climate change denier.

Reality is we need large scale changes more than anything, then everything else would fall into place.

So why advocate for a candidate that is determined to oppose the large scale changes you claim we need?

 

[Red Squirrel]

So why advocate for a candidate that is determined to oppose the large scale changes you claim we need?

Environment is one place where I sometimes disagree with conservatives, but let's be real, liberals have not done much for it either except for making stuff more expensive.

 

[SteveGrabowski]

There's a lot of that political will in California. It has a lot to do with the fact that gasoline costs something like $1.00 more per gallon here. Not just to keep people out of their cars but to make the gas burn cleaner.

Still blows me away the state of public transportation in California. When I was at UCLA the god damn NIMBYs in Santa Monica kept killing expansion of the purple line subway because they didn't want blacks and latinos being able to easily get to their side of town. Even today it still only goes to Westwood Blvd AFAIK. Would have killed to have even that though when I lived in the area to make the commute downtown for work so much easier.

 

[Muse]

Environment is one place where I sometimes disagree with conservatives, but let's be real, liberals have not done much for it either except for making stuff more expensive.

OK, eggspurt.

 

[Muse]

Still blows me away the state of public transportation in California. When I was at UCLA the god damn NIMBYs in Santa Monica kept killing expansion of the purple line subway because they didn't want blacks and latinos being able to easily get to their side of town. Even today it still only goes to Westwood Blvd AFAIK. Would have killed to have even that though when I lived in the area to make the commute downtown for work so much easier.

AFAIK, public transportation has pretty much always been pretty lousy in Los Angeles (grew up there). Maybe in the first 1/2 of the 20th century it was better, but 2nd half? uh uh. Glad I don't live there now, I have heard too much about the horrible traffic.

 

[[DHT]Osiris]

Yes this is correct. I've been saying this for a while, but then get accused for just blaming someone else and being a climate change denier.

Reality is we need large scale changes more than anything, then everything else would fall into place.

You get derided when you act like this isn't something anyone should be worried about, or something the govt shouldn't be doing, or that you are being targeted.

In addition, those 'large scale changes' only come from force of govt regulations. There will never be a point in time when the businesses of the world decide to be nice to everyone and do it themselves.

 

[Fenixgoon]

Yes this is correct. I've been saying this for a while, but then get accused for just blaming someone else and being a climate change denier.

Reality is we need large scale changes more than anything, then everything else would fall into place.

But you advocate to put people in power who don't want any kind of large scale changes whatsoever.

You are literally advocating against your own claimed interests

 

[cytg111]

But you advocate to put people in power who don't want any kind of large scale changes whatsoever.

You are literally advocating against your own claimed interests

Also the problem with climate change is that it has been politicized.
So you wanna achieve big global change but it should not involve politics too much.

Yea that makes banging sense. Fuck the Paris Accord.

Which side has been denying the problem, still is denying the problem? The party that is primarily motivated by big donor money. Surprise.

But actually I think red is onto something. The only way to not politicize it is to have a King to just direct how it's going to be, no talky talky needed.

Of course the King they got is a clean coal idiot.

So get fucked.

 

[hal2kilo]

You get derided when you act like this isn't something anyone should be worried about, or something the govt shouldn't be doing, or that you are being targeted.

In addition, those 'large scale changes' only come from force of govt regulations. There will never be a point in time when the businesses of the world decide to be nice to everyone and do it themselves.

Businesses try to externalize as many costs a possible, Make that someone else's problem.

 

[APU_Fusion]

climate change truth like STEM is dead. It is who yells the loudest and appeals to the lowest alt-fact denominator now on social media to grift the most from those too dumb to know they are the mark.

 

[Moonbeam]

climate change truth like STEM is dead. It is who yells the loudest and appeals to the lowest alt-fact denominator now on social media to grift the most from those too dumb to know they are the mark.

Too dumb to know or relieved to believe?

 

[Greenman]

You've not seen it because of this:

View attachment 111758

It exists only for those that can afford it during the coming populist revolution and Elon is making sure they have a planet or a space station they can hide out on!

I find this a little hard to believe. 24% pay increase over 47 years?

 

[brycejones]

I find this a little hard to believe. 24% pay increase over 47 years?

In real earnings power? Sounds about right actually, remember the vast majority of productivity gains have flowed to investors since the early 80s.

The numbers could be better explained but it’s probably accurate

 

[[DHT]Osiris]

This looks like a good enough spot.
As of 2024, the Arctic is officially a net carbon producer, taking into account wildfires release of methane and CO2 will only increase, so that specific astrix won't last long (in case anyone feels like getting argumentative). Permafrost methane release is one of the bigguns that's going to accelerate climate change faster than we've even been doing it. It's unknown how much warmer we'll see from a significant amount of permafrost release, but it's already past the tipping point so we'll find out soon enough!

Arctic Terrestrial Carbon Cycling - NOAA Arctic

DOI: 10.25923/0gpp-mn10 S. M. Natali1, B. Rogers1, E. A. G. Schuur2, V. Romanovsky3, H. Alcock4, K. Arndt1, E. S. Euskirchen5,6, G. Falvo2, G. Fiske1, G. Hould-Gosselin4, J. Hung1, A. Kholodov3, S. Potter1, O. Sonnentag4, and A. -M. Virkkala1 1Woodwell Climate Research Center, Falmouth, MA, USA...

arctic.noaa.gov

 

[MrSquished]

Yes. Your perceived indifference infers that you dont have skin in the game, skin in this context would be children and/or grand children... Or at least none that you have a caring relationship with.

I take issue with your stance cause it's quite obvious that you use these forums as an outlet for that inherent need you have to label some other group of people as idiots. These idiots screaming on the internet and doing nothing in real life "lol" they dumb. Right?
But at least they didnt eat meat. Lol. Libtards.
Makes you feel good right? Those idiots. Tsk.
And in this instance you just leverage a climate debate to achieve that.

You know, its probably for the best.

Greenman's wife is a childless cat lady?

Who knew 🤷🏼

 

[sandorski]

This looks like a good enough spot.
As of 2024, the Arctic is officially a net carbon producer, taking into account wildfires release of methane and CO2 will only increase, so that specific astrix won't last long (in case anyone feels like getting argumentative). Permafrost methane release is one of the bigguns that's going to accelerate climate change faster than we've even been doing it. It's unknown how much warmer we'll see from a significant amount of permafrost release, but it's already past the tipping point so we'll find out soon enough!

Arctic Terrestrial Carbon Cycling - NOAA Arctic

DOI: 10.25923/0gpp-mn10 S. M. Natali1, B. Rogers1, E. A. G. Schuur2, V. Romanovsky3, H. Alcock4, K. Arndt1, E. S. Euskirchen5,6, G. Falvo2, G. Fiske1, G. Hould-Gosselin4, J. Hung1, A. Kholodov3, S. Potter1, O. Sonnentag4, and A. -M. Virkkala1 1Woodwell Climate Research Center, Falmouth, MA, USA...

arctic.noaa.gov

We shouldn't we do anything until the Arctic stops!...

 

[hal2kilo]

In real earnings power? Sounds about right actually, remember the vast majority of productivity gains have flowed to investors since the early 80s.

The numbers could be better explained but it’s probably accurate

That's why your only hedge against this is to invest. Working income will just let you tread water, as designed by those who determine how much they need to live their lifestyles with free abandon. They let you get the change that falls behind their couch cushions, so you can be a permanent renter of everything.

 

[cytg111]

Greenman's wife is a childless cat lady?

Who knew 🤷🏼

Its kinda funny I feel like green and felix is passing eachother going opposite directions. You win some you lose some.

 

[Amused]

You might pay a bit of attention to who posts what around here before losing your shit.

I lose my shit every time I flush. 🤷‍♂️

 

[cytg111]

Another mouth breathing waste of oxygen also wants to burn their house down because they are a bit chilly and want to warm up. How fucking stupid are these people, and yes that is a rhetorical question.

Hint you dumb motherfucker, oil are gas production is what the fuck is destroying the only home we have, you stupid motherfucker.

PS. I will not apologize or hold my punches when calling stupid motherfuckers, stupid motherfuckers, because it is simply the reality that they are stupid motherfuckers, and need to be told so. Nothing personal, I'm not attacking you, I am just describing you.

Sarcasm is a hell of a drug .

 

[UNCjigga]

I know I’m being flippant, but can’t we just plant new trees/vegetation when permafrost melts and offset the greenhouse gases? Trump: “Do that and sweep the floors to prevent wildfires. Problem solved!”

 

[APU_Fusion]

I know I’m being flippant, but can’t we just plant new trees/vegetation when permafrost melts and offset the greenhouse gases? Trump: “Do that and sweep the floors to prevent wildfires. Problem solved!”

Hell no. We use that fresh new land for more BEEF. Make beef prices great again