• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Question Zen 6 Speculation Thread

Page 375 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
adroc_thurston said:
They care about DIY very much; they own the place and will collect hearthy margins there.
Click to expand...
You haven't commented directly about the delay. I mean you seem to give the impression it might still launch this year, but without taking explicit stance. Or maybe I am reading too much or too little into this😉
 
adroc_thurston said:
wut?
2-4 years to what
Click to expand...

When AMD handed Alder Lake undisputed performance leadership over Zen 3 (rather than a tie vs. Zen 3 V-Cache) that loss of Halo effect persisted until Zen 5 V-Cache.

That's because there were some cases where Zen 4 V-Cache did not build Raptor Lake, and Intel fans claimed that those CPUs were tied.

Only Zen 5 V-Cache reclaimed undisputed leadership, the same as what AMD gave away to Alder Lake.
 
Joe NYC said:
When AMD handed Alder Lake undisputed performance leadership over Zen 3 (rather than a tie vs. Zen 3 V-Cache) that loss of Halo effect persisted until Zen 5 V-Cache.

That's because there were some cases where Zen 4 V-Cache did not build Raptor Lake, and Intel fans claimed that those CPUs were tied.

Only Zen 5 V-Cache reclaimed undisputed leadership, the same as what AMD gave away to Alder Lake.
Click to expand...
This has nothing to do with this babble and everything to do with RPL being good nuff in gaming.
Intel just got hit with a double whammy of RPL suicides and ARL-S being poo in gaming.
 
gdansk said:
I suspect NVL bLLC will be competitive with 9800X3D so to give Intel a few months of being on top in 1T, MT, and good enough in gaming would be hilarious self-sabotage.
Click to expand...
I think bLLC will be better; however, the latency will not be close to X3D in AMD's designs. I don't believe NVL with bLLC will even best 9800X3D rather on 10800X3D. Just my speculation.
yuri69 said:
Huh? Zen 6 does not seem to be a big bump - it is more like in Intel's territory of ~10% IPC.

I guess nobody expects Zen 7 "soon", as before 2028/2029.
Click to expand...
I think IPC will be north of 10%. Perhaps 12-14%; however, clocks will be in the 6.2-6.5Ghiz region so when combined with the IPC increase, it will be a pretty significant bump. At least that is how I am reading the tea leaves.
 
OneEng2 said:
I think bLLC will be better; however, the latency will not be close to X3D in AMD's designs. I don't believe NVL with bLLC will even best 9800X3D rather on 10800X3D. Just my speculation.
Click to expand...
It’s a big and thus expensive slab of silicon, so to be worth it I guess it must be close.

But I also wonder how big latency difference can be expected. And what the net result difference will be in gaming performance.
 
DrMrLordX said:
Yeah but why compete with an old part like that? All they're doing is setting themselves up to get smashed by Zen6.
Click to expand...
Don't underestimate NVL bLLC when it comes to gaming, even Raptor Cove + big cache would likely get close enough to Zen5 3D. If Intel fixes their uncore and cache latency (big IF, but still) they should be competitive with Zen6 3D.
 
To me, the only wildcard for NVL is the paired P cores sharing a larger block of L2. If they can keep the latency of that L2 decent, get better Fmax on the P cores and also increase the average instruction throughput per clock of the core itself, they'll win a few benchmarks that spill the L2 on Zen5/6 heavily. Beyond that, I remain to be convinced that NVL is going to be significantly faster than the seppuku prone RPL K parts.
 
There are certainly lots of "ifs" about how competitive a NVL with bLLC might be with ZEN6 X3D or even 9800 X3D.

I tend to believe that AMD simply has a huge lead in technology like chiplets, and stacked L3, and that it is unlikely that the huge gap can be overcome by Intel by the next attempt.

I also believe that Intel is STILL being weighed down by its fab work and the old philosophy of win by brute force through fab superiority.

But mostly I believe that AMD simply has a very good strategy in its server first design. They are really racking up the margins year after year. They also have the momentum gained over the good decision making done a decade back.

I expect NVL to be much better than we believe, but ZEN 6 to be even more so.
 
OneEng2 said:
I tend to believe that AMD simply has a huge lead in technology like chiplets, and stacked L3
Click to expand...
They have much better cores and a much better L3.
OneEng2 said:
I also believe that Intel is STILL being weighed down by its fab work and the old philosophy of win by brute force through fab superiority.
Click to expand...
Their CPU IP flat out sucks. It's very simple.
OneEng2 said:
I expect NVL to be much better than we believe, but ZEN 6 to be even more so.
Click to expand...
NVL sucks.
Zen6 tbd.
 
Joe NYC said:
Just contemplating of what it would take run into N2 supply issues that could only arise if the actual demand far exceeds the number of wafers ordered.

A lot of people ignore the fact that when AMD placed order for N2 and TSMC confirmed it, those wafers are as good as money in the bank, independent of what else is taking place in the industry with other players.
Click to expand...

AMD has a certain amount of confirmed N2 wafers, and no guarantees they will get any more than what they already have confirmed. So yes those are like money in the bank, but like money in the bank they'll want to invest it what makes them the most profit.

If they see enough demand from the datacenter market they could easily decide to allocate nearly all of those wafers there, leaving precious little for Zen 6 PC/laptop parts. They might trickle some out at the very high end / high profit range, but unless the AI bubble bursts this year I can't see them making a big launch with wide availability. If they can earn x dollars of profit per wafer making Zen 6 PC chips or 2x, 3x, 5x who knows as much profit per wafer making AI/Epyc chips it would be financially stupid to do the former.

They can keep selling Zen 5, or port Zen 6 to N3 family processes to avoid wasting that "money in the bank" making peanuts by comparison to what they could be making. If the AI bubble keeps inflating DRAM/NAND will continue to get more expensive, causing PC demand to crater so it might not matter that much anyway.
 
Fjodor2001 said:
Are you talking about gaming specifically, or also for other use cases including MT workloads?
Click to expand...
Both I think. I believe that ARL was critically hamstrung by the high latency of off-chip interconnects. Zen 5 X3D was very very good with respect to latency.

It isn't hard to imagine that Intel (like AMD before it) had problems reconciling the architecture around off-chip resources. If that was able to be fixed (even a little bit) it could result in some big wins across a broad range of applications.

Zen 5 has long since (a couple of generations) found ways to deal with off chip latency ...... AND has perfected chip stacking which provides much lower latency access to L3 that Intel's bLLC is every likely to achieve (physics).

So where I am coming from is that ARL->NVL there is great opportunity for improvement. Zen 5-6 will likely find most of its gains from faster clock speeds made possible by the shrink from N4P to N2. Intel on the other hand will likely get much less of a boost moving from N3B to either N2 or 18A .... and I have great concerns about the fmax for 18A.

I think that NVL 52c will dominate Zen 6 24c in MT; however, it may be a moot point since at its price point it may well be up against thread ripper which, IMO, will beat it badly in highly MT loads that people are likely to shell out that kind of money to run.
Hulk said:
Do you think this article right? 2027 for Zen 6/Nova Lake?

www.tomshardware.com

AMD Zen 6 and Intel Nova Lake CPUs reportedly arriving late, delayed to CES 2027 — next-gen chips rocked by industry turmoil

Zen 6 and Nova Lake are supposed to release this year.
www.tomshardware.com www.tomshardware.com
Click to expand...
I think that AMD has little reason to rush. Zen 5 already dominates ARL. I think it more likely that AMD will simply not release Zen 6 DT until Intel manages NVL..... and I suspect Intel is having yield issues with NVL pushing back their release date. I think AMD is just waiting ..... and raking in the profit from Zen 5 every day that Intel doesn't have an answer.

I think you and I both remember a time when Intel did the same exact thing ..... for like 10 years!

Lack of competition has shown itself to be VERY bad for consumers. Let's all hope Intel gets their act together or we aren't going to see Zen 6 for quite a while.
 
OneEng2 said:
I think that AMD has little reason to rush. Zen 5 already dominates ARL. I think it more likely that AMD will simply not release Zen 6 DT until Intel manages NVL..... and I suspect Intel is having yield issues with NVL pushing back their release date. I think AMD is just waiting ..... and raking in the profit from Zen 5 every day that Intel doesn't have an answer.

I think you and I both remember a time when Intel did the same exact thing ..... for like 10 years!
Click to expand...
2 * Only the paranoid survive.
 
OneEng2 said:
I believe that ARL was critically hamstrung by the high latency of off-chip interconnects.
Click to expand...
The added tile latency combined with moving the IMC away from the compute tile probably did most of the damage, but ARL also has weird problems with cache latency. That's why I argued NVL might register a big jump in gaming, that big cache version can hide the IMC mess as long as Intel fixes their L3 (relative to size ofc).

OneEng2 said:
Zen 5-6 will likely find most of its gains from faster clock speeds made possible by the shrink from N4P to N2.
Click to expand...
AFAIK Zen 6 makes use of the advanced packaging seen for Strix Halo, so it should also see significant improvements in latency and power. A great recap of the packaging used in Halo can be found here.
 
OneEng2 said:
I think that NVL 52c will dominate Zen 6 24c in MT; however, it may be a moot point since at its price point it may well be up against thread ripper which, IMO, will beat it badly in highly MT loads that people are likely to shell out that kind of money to run.
Click to expand...

It will depend on all core clock rates which can differ from f-max quite a lot.

IPC uplifts seem to be similar ish but it seems Z6 will have a clock bump nvl won't. How that shakes out for all cores will determine the MT winner in the highly threaded parts.

Feeding all those cores may come at a significant power cost so it will also depend on if Intel are willing to juice it just to win a few benches.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top