Question Zen 6 Speculation Thread

Page 329 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Fjodor2001

Diamond Member
Feb 6, 2010
4,456
680
126
Idk core count hardly matters above like 6c.
Will be above 8c once 10th gen consoles ship and give gamedevs 2 more cores to play around with.

What you want is 1t.
Good news, you're getting it!
Then why is AMD releasing 9950X3D2, which provides X3D cache for 16C/32T mainly useful for gaming?
 

Fjodor2001

Diamond Member
Feb 6, 2010
4,456
680
126
There's gotta be a sucker that buys it.
Worthless part otherwise.
Or you’re wrong about it’s usefulness and thus implicitly the use of up to 16C/32T. Does not make sense for AMD to release it unless X3D2 is going to perform better than X3D.

At least you’re admitting 9950X3D2 will happen now. You denied it like forever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ToTTenTranz

carrotmania

Member
Oct 3, 2020
124
310
136
Or you’re wrong about it’s usefulness and thus implicitly the use of up to 16C/32T. Does not make sense for AMD to release it unless X3D2 is going to perform better than X3D.

At least you’re admitting 9950X3D2 will happen now. You denied it like forever.
It makes sense if the margins make sense. Stop making it out that companies short term plans never ever change. Adroc is bullish, sure, but the consensus is that dual X3D won't make that much difference, BUT AMD are probably looking at the market and seeing people still pay through nose for GPUs, and now RAM.

Why wouldn't they release a part that doesn't really make sense, but priced at $999, means margins are excellent, their internals now say people will buy it, and their 2 years of packaging expertise means it's less risk now...
 

Fjodor2001

Diamond Member
Feb 6, 2010
4,456
680
126
It makes sense if the margins make sense. Stop making it out that companies short term plans never ever change. Adroc is bullish, sure, but the consensus is that dual X3D won't make that much difference, BUT AMD are probably looking at the market and seeing people still pay through nose for GPUs, and now RAM.

Why wouldn't they release a part that doesn't really make sense, but priced at $999, means margins are excellent, their internals now say people will buy it, and their 2 years of packaging expertise means it's less risk now...
He said 9950X3D2 would not happen. He was wrong. End of story.

There was no disclaimer about if this or that mentioned. He simply said it would not happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Win2012R2

inquiss

Senior member
Oct 13, 2010
601
865
136
He said 9950X3D2 would not happen. He was wrong. End of story.

There was no disclaimer about if this or that mentioned. He simply said it would not happen.
Meh, it shouldn't happen. When it inevitably isn't important for, well, anything really, I wonder if the people like you clamoring for it will be disappointed
 
Last edited:

CouncilorIrissa

Senior member
Jul 28, 2023
770
2,797
106
No. Absolutely not. We left the 1 core era about 2 decades ago.
No. And especially not for mainstream / general laptops.
No, mainstream laptops (and pretty much everything non-DTR class) quite literally are glorified javascript crunchers, where single-threaded performance is king.
You're running a browser? Great, javascript it is. Microsoft 365? Google Docs? You're running JS as well. Slack? Notion? VSCode? JS again. More often than not, chances are what you're running is either a React Native app, or worse, something WebView-based. Hell, you can't even launch the startup menu without tapping into React Native nowadays.
 

carrotmania

Member
Oct 3, 2020
124
310
136
He said 9950X3D2 would not happen. He was wrong. End of story.

There was no disclaimer about if this or that mentioned. He simply said it would not happen.
Just. Stop.
He's big headed sure. But it's obvious that AMD weren't considering offering 3DX2. Adroc doesn't, and doesn't claim to, have knowledge of AMDs internal margins and defect rates. Sure, he speaks in absolutes, but anyone smart can see that AMD must be feeling this is just a way to wring some more money out of enthusiasts, while their process is mature and there's zero competition from Intel. A business decision has changed, and recently. You need to get over it. You're as bad as he is with your definites, and you add even less to the conversation than he does.
Stop.
 

inquiss

Senior member
Oct 13, 2010
601
865
136
Just. Stop.
He's big headed sure. But it's obvious that AMD weren't considering offering 3DX2. Adroc doesn't, and doesn't claim to, have knowledge of AMDs internal margins and defect rates. Sure, he speaks in absolutes, but anyone smart can see that AMD must be feeling this is just a way to wring some more money out of enthusiasts, while their process is mature and there's zero competition from Intel. A business decision has changed, and recently. You need to get over it. You're as bad as he is with your definites, and you add even less to the conversation than he does.
Stop.
Absolutely, it's a pointless product but if they make money from some, so be it. This poster will be first in line to crow if it doesn't add much to performance though and will tout it as an AMD fail, it's so predictable