- Mar 3, 2017
- 1,777
- 6,791
- 136
How much of it is iOS and therefore irrelevant to the discussion of Android vs WoA?Reality of gaming on ARM is that 90% of gaming market already is on ARM devices. Mobile gaming vastly outperforms desktop, and console markets.
Very much since a lot of mobile gaming is in Asia and Android is still main platform there.How much of it is iOS and therefore irrelevant to the discussion of Android vs WoA?
In any case these will not be too relevant to Zen 5 outside of the handheld niche.
Very different games and thus game market.Mobile gaming vastly outperforms desktop, and console markets
x86 appears to be dying platform
Very much since a lot of mobile gaming is in Asia and Android is still main platform there.
Its relevant because on mainstream market, x86 appears to be dying platform, that has very little advantage over other solutions. "If you want to cross the river, you do not need a battleship for that".
casinos aren't gaming.Very much since a lot of mobile gaming is in Asia and Android is still main platform there.
they're not games. casinos.Very different games and thus game market.
casinos aren't gaming.
they're not games. casinos.
A casino is more profitable than an art museum but it's still a casino.It doesn't matter, what we consider what games are, or not.
Its about how much money they are generating.
Mobile market is far profitable than desktop and laptop. And if you know companies - follow the money
But it's true. Everything on mobile besides 3.5 big boy PC game ports is gacha now.That's a smartass comment but I like it!
and that because phone games that are casinos, are free to download, but they bring in a ton of cash !! Probably leaves laptops to waste (no numbers, just a feeling)A casino is more profitable than an art museum but it's still a casino.
But it's true. Everything on mobile besides 3.5 big boy PC game ports is gacha now.
These fantasies that non-portable computers will eventually be replaced by portable ones are complete nonsense.
– Ergonomics,
– potential computing capacity,
– economics
of portable computers are drastically inferior to non-portable ones.
You call them "excellent" at both roles, but anything with a 7945HX gets like 3-4 hours battery life tops. That's not what I'd call "excellent" as a laptop, that's what I'd call "absolutely dog-water".
7840HS laptops are different, but those can't be considered "desktop replacements" anyway. I can see a genuine mass-market usecase for these, because they don't compromise on battery life, remain reasonably portable and provide good performance on the go. But they don't match up to a full desktop in CPU performance whatsoever.
If I wanted something that was actually desktop class, I'd only consider something with Strix Halo or M4 Pro/Max (although I'd rule out the latter personally because I hate MacOS). Eventually more manufacturers are going to launch similar kinds of products, but for now those are the only two options I would consider.
They could really benefit I think from some initiative like what Intel did with the “Ultrabook” standard7945HX with 3-4 hours battery is a miracle TBH
Halo is better in every regard indeed, a goddamn tablet running 9950x in super efficient mode
The existence of Halo 100% supports the argument I'm trying to make
Why buy a desktop? Just get Halo or Fire range
IF ONLY AMD had a super close collaboration with an OEM to produce a real macbook killer!
Maybe we see that in next gen Medusa
🙏 Pray to Lisa Su 🙏
Apropos practical reality. You must have missed at least two thirds of my post, if not more. I direct your attention to just the topmost of the several parts of my post:practical reality
Reality of gaming on ARM is that 90% of gaming market already is on ARM devices. Mobile gaming vastly outperforms desktop, and console markets.
The reality of this situation is that now Android has finally chips to scale devices from mobile to desktop, and laptop form factor. Kids who play mainly mobile games will have incentive to use such products because - they will have the same games on all: smartphone, tablet, laptop, desktop.
The faster AMD, Nvidia, and even Intel will see this, the better for their business.
Because scaling Android to desktop, with all of its Apps, since we have hardware now, will be cheaper andeasier than scaling Windows to ARM.
EOT.
Also memory model!No.
The ISA games are compiled into is mostly a non factor. You write in C or whatever and compile it, and it doesn't matter much whether it compiles into x86 or ARM. You might call some libraries or even write a few short assembler sections in tight loops to insure the best SIMD code can be used, that's about it.
The difficulty in writing and porting games is in everything that surrounds that code you write - the OS and GPU drivers. Having competitive ARM SoCs does nothing to help Android games run on Windows.
Even if we restrict ourselves to a PC with the power and performance level of the 7945HX (and which GPU?), your portable computer is a *lot* louder than a decently built stationary computer. Furthermore, keyboard and screen of your portable computer are bolted onto each other and are therefore by definition not ergonomic. Unhealthy in prolonged use.
What memory kit is that?I dont think ARM can be faster then this in gaming until we see several generations of ARM.
Especially if paired with a higher mid tier GPU. Even if the ARM was getting 100fps on that game, im pretty sure the 9800X3D would do like 400+ with a DGPU.
View attachment 115078
AMD pretty much wrecks the gaming market now... and i think its gonna be that way until several more generations, or if AI can somehow magically squeeze out more frame rates.
Yes i am gonna have fun this weekend tweeking the living hell out of this, just need to wait for the 5090.
My Surface Pro would like right of challenge to your statement to this.
And keyboards can be virtual, or even pen based with learning.
No one said you need a physical keyboard, and smart phone users are proof of that statement.
What memory kit is that?
I use the desktop for games too, but do all my work on a Surface pro 7+ and take that on travel. It's light enough that I can put it alongside another work laptop in the same bag if needed. I have some classic RTS/4X games and emulators on it, which work fine on any PC.I travel fairly often, sometimes for over two weeks at a time. I can't remember the last time I brought even a thin and light laptop with me. A tablet does the job just fine these days. Also odds are a will be lugging around my DSLR and who knows how many lenses for that. Last thing I want is a laptop bag to have to deal with as well. And when I am home nothing beats a desktop. Why bother with a laptop if I'm just going to put it in a docking station anywa?
I'm nbot saying my solution works for everyone or that yours has no merit. I am just explaining why my preferences.
I use the desktop for games too, but do all my work on a Surface pro 7+ and take that on travel. It's light enough that I can put it alongside another work laptop in the same bag if needed. I have some classic RTS/4X games and emulators on it, which work fine on any PC.
DTR laptops won't replace desktops just because of the power output. There is no way to have a 575W 5090 in a laptop.
I barely play phone games at all (only have a few ports of old PC games) but it's true that this market is much bigger than PC/console.
It's not N3e.N3E for Z6