- Mar 3, 2017
- 1,777
- 6,791
- 136
Normally, yes, but when Ian Cutress says "due to a typo" that would be box packaging and labeling, not what you are speaking about.
Going from how omnipresent the 9900X is in marketing and product listing leaks, and the first early review also being on a 9900X, I very much doubt that.My best guess is that the Yields just aren't there. 5.4 and 5.5GHz kinda works, so the 2 small SKUs can Release on 8th, but the number of 5.6 and 5.7GHz CCDs is so low that it would've been a paper launch.
With all the 13 and 14th gen degradation stories that are going on they have enough to worry about with their own rigs to be concerned with AMD.Sadly, the only ones rejoicing at AMD's recall are Intel users who get more time to NOT get depressed upon seeing Zen 5 benchmarks.
LPDDR5x @ 8533 MHz with 256-bit interface is 273 GB/s.Is there a chance Strix Halo would outperform 9950X for membw bound workloads?
Does anyone happen to have numbers for theoretical membw for Strix Halo vs 2:1 DDR5 ~8000 on Zen5 DT?
They are guessing. They see AMD recalling all units and announcing that they're replacing it with a fresh batch and jump to the conclusion that it must be a hardware issue.That’s not what hardwareluxx is reporting. It’s also a hardware issue.
Yeah, by a lot, each CCD gets 2*32B fabric uplink (aka the new norm going forward).Is there a chance Strix Halo would outperform 9950X for membw bound workloads?
That's not the limiting factor at all.LPDDR5x @ 8533 MHz with 256-bit interface is 273 GB/s.
I'm aware. He explicitly asked about memory bandwidth, not the throughput between the I/O die and the CCD (for GNR).That's not the limiting factor at all.
I already gave my opinion in post #16459Is 3600uclk and 2400fclk possible or is the italian guy delusional ?
N3E is not just for server. N3P is the evolution of N3E.N3E is enterprise/server, N3 is efficient junk. N3P is the value play performance/efficiency mainstream 3nm. N3X is for Nvidia, high end performance and increased silicon density.
TSMC dictates the prices not Apple. Anyway, if you believe so show some proof that that Apple is increasing the price of TSMC nodes.Yes because then most "cheap" AMD users wouldn't want the extra cost being passed onto them. And the cost got driven high due to Apple.
At least AMD owes customers an explanation and a side by side comparison of the non certified chips vs. the certified AMD Zen 5 chips they are sending out to testers. We need to see what is going on and why the 1-2 week release delay is happening.
Funny thing i got hands on 5600x on 31th oct 6days before official release. And litteraly noone was interested back then xD I think i only got a mention on VC or WCFKEKSo Italian dude with 9900X runs a few gaming tests with a "questionable" memory setup and thats it? Radio silence since then? At least throw us some more crumbs, bro, even stale ones, lol. People better hope I never manage to snag such an early unit and not be under NDA like him. There would be a lot of pissed off tech news outlets out there...![]()
It's called transparency.. . . Why?
With no official reviews performed with potentially defective units and no retail sales to consumers of potentially defective units, there's very little reason for transparency. AMD has not "wronged" anyone, only delayed a product release a short time. They very well could have delayed it with no statement at all.It's called transparency.
Is AMD paying you for your statement? Or are you an AMD voluntary public service agent here on the forum?With no official reviews performed with potentially defective units and no retail sales to consumers of potentially defective units, there's very little reason for transparency. AMD has not "wronged" anyone, only delayed a product release a short time. They very well could have delayed it with no statement at all.
It's called transparency.
It's common sense logic. Who buys up capacity in bulk, years in advance and who has loads of cash and still makes loads more through their uniquely demented userbase? Out of all of TSMC's customers, that's Apple. They may have done a service to mankind by enabling TSMC to do accelerated R&D for the invention of advanced process technologies because of Apple's needs but they are also the ones who promoted TSMC to becoming a monopoly. Apple is like oxygen. A necessary evil. Too much leads to oxidation and accelerated aging and not enough halts future progress. I love *some* things about them but I hate way more about them than I love about them.TSMC dictates the prices not Apple. Anyway, if you believe so show some proof that that Apple is increasing the price of TSMC nodes.
Fantastic reply. I always like hearing from strange new worlds.Is AMD paying you for your statement? Or are you an AMD voluntary public service agent here on the forum?
Well, this expected if they talk about Epyc : 4nm vs 3 nmIan said that Zen 5c would see a much smaller drop in frequencies compared to what Z4c had relative to the classic cores.
Interesting.
I don't really believe AMD. This sounds too suspicious, TBH.AMD said they discovered an issue (in testing), it's been resolved, and good product will be delivered with a very small delay. As long as the released products are good, there will be nothing to add to the story.
I don't really believe AMD. This sounds too suspicious, TBH.
AMD said there was issues and he doesn't believe AMD so obviously theres no issues and the delay is because AMD felt like it.Ok. . .
What do you think is the issue then?