• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)

Page 272 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
On package RAM isn't a totally new idea. Intel already shipped it in the Kabylake+Vega wacky product they made back in 2018:

images-8.jpg

So yes, putting dedicated VRAM on package is certainly doable. But I still think that configurable, user replaceable LPCAMM is the way forward- 256 bits of LPDDR5X should be plenty of bandwidth for any APU that fits in a laptop thermal envelope.
Unless the entire SoC shares the entire bandwidth instead of separating between the CPU and iGPU it'd be quite troubling to feed both components
 
Can 256 bit LPDDR5X feed the potential 40 CU RDNA 3.5 iGPU though? The 6700XT itself has 384 GB/s bandwidth..
Not even 256bits of LPDDR5X-8533 can get near that, they will need to include some cache and maybe RDNA3.5 is a bit more memory efficient than RDNA2 as well.
 
Not even 256bits of LPDDR5X-8533 can get near that, they will need to include some cache and maybe RDNA3.5 is a bit more memory efficient than RDNA2 as well.
RDNA 3 is 33% more memory efficient iirc but they will need even more efficiency or more/better cache technology unless Strix Halo is destined to be always bandwidth starved
 
Can 256 bit LPDDR5X feed the potential 40 CU RDNA 3.5 iGPU though? The 6700XT itself has 384 GB/s bandwidth..
Yeah, I have been wondering about memory bandwidth for a while...As FP32's TFs are based on clock speed; I believe AMD would clock Sarlak's GPU lower than usual. As calculated here, with 2500MHz, Sarlak's GPU theoretical speed is double of Strix Point which has half of memory bandwidth.....

Of course, the above Sarlak is for 256-bit LPDDR5x version, we should see LPDDR6 version one year later.... 😉
 
Yeah, I have been wondering about memory bandwidth for a while...As FP32's TFs are based on clock speed; I believe AMD would clock Sarlak's GPU lower than usual. As calculated here, with 2500MHz, Sarlak's GPU theoretical speed is double of Strix Point which has half of memory bandwidth.....

Of course, the above Sarlak is for 256-bit LPDDR5x version, we should see LPDDR6 version one year later.... 😉
If they are aiming for LPDDR5X this late the reason has to be LPCAMM2, and just so happens 2 x LPCAMM2 = 256bits.
 
Wasn't Radeon already an AMD trademark in 2018?
Radeon branding comes from years before AMD acquired ATi after they transitioned from the earlier 'Rage' 3D accelerator branding.

Hypothetically AMD would have acquired all ATi's trademarks and branding along with Radeon back in 2006

The Qualcomm Adreno GPU brand is an anagram of Radeon in reference to their original low power ISA/µArch acquisition from AMD/ATi.
 
LPDDR5 came about 17 months before regular DDR5 did.

It's not a stretch to imagine that LPDDR6 will follow a similar cadence and appear significantly before regular DDR6.
The thing is LPDDR6 will initially be very expensive and limited in supply, hence being relegated to flagship smartphones that are of course very expensive and sell in low volumes.

When have laptop makers been so quick to adopt a new LPDDR version?
 
Their source is MLID.
Pretty sure he's guessing. MB manufactures can just reuse their current boards and just add 'now supports Zen XXXX CPUs!!!" Or, call them x670E Super Overdrive Extreme or some other marketing gobbilty beloved patriot.

WTH? beloved patriot?
 
Last edited:
LPDDR5 came about 17 months before regular DDR5 did.

It's not a stretch to imagine that LPDDR6 will follow a similar cadence and appear significantly before regular DDR6.
Yep, but this round LPDDR6 and DDR6 should launch within the same 2026 year.. Of course, nobody cares about CAMM2 anymore by then 😛


DDR6.png
 
The thing is LPDDR6 will initially be very expensive and limited in supply, hence being relegated to flagship smartphones that are of course very expensive and sell in low volumes.

When have laptop makers been so quick to adopt a new LPDDR version?
LPDDR6 are selling directly to OEMs which are much cheaper than DDR6 at retail prices
 
Pretty sure he's guessing. MB manufactures can just reuse their current boards and just add 'now supports Zen XXXX CPUs!!!" Or, call them x670E Super Overdrive Extreme or some other marketing gobbilty beloved patriot.
Probably just better memory overclocking with more expensive traces or extra PCIe 5.0 lanes.
 
Go calculate memory bandwidth of 192-bit LPDDR6 and think why AMD going to launch Sarlak with 40CU? (instead of 32CU which is double the Strix Point's 16CU)
You are just speculating.

P.S. If there will be a replacement for Strix Halo - it will use 9600 LPCAMM2 LPDDR5 memory, because that is the next logical step.
 
Back
Top