You remember Kim Davis? The woman who refused marriages to gays? She lost.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
May 11, 2008
22,551
1,470
126
music.png
She's got Kimmy Davis thighs…

Jummy :

Kim-Davis-069.jpg



 
Last edited:

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,776
6,338
126
You remember Kim Davis? The woman who refused marriages to gays? She lost.


Not possible, since I hear more and more from our Liberal establishment that America is turning into a theocracy and how our dear leader, the pussy-grabber, blowhard, twice divorced, 3 times married, currently to an ex model who did soft core porn, is leading the way,

There's a shit ton of Politicians trying. Keep your head in the sand if you must.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ch33zw1z

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,749
20,323
146
You remember Kim Davis? The woman who refused marriages to gays? She lost.


Not possible, since I hear more and more from our Liberal establishment that America is turning into a theocracy and how our dear leader, the pussy-grabber, blowhard, twice divorced, 3 times married, currently to an ex model who did soft core porn, is leading the way,
Definitely not for lack of trying. The pieces are moving into position.
 

J.Wilkins

Platinum Member
Jun 5, 2017
2,681
640
91
You remember Kim Davis? The woman who refused marriages to gays? She lost.


Not possible, since I hear more and more from our Liberal establishment that America is turning into a theocracy and how our dear leader, the pussy-grabber, blowhard, twice divorced, 3 times married, currently to an ex model who did soft core porn, is leading the way,

You forgot "teenage dressing room peeking" and adulterer.

Don't worry though, the so called Christians will not run out of hatred of your neighbour any time soon, next up is hating and discriminating against transexuals.

It's the second most important commandment you know, hate your neighbour. At least it is in their version of Christianity.
 

Ackmed

Diamond Member
Oct 1, 2003
8,499
560
126
There's a huge difference between a makeup artist losing first prize and a systematic campaign to deny marriage to people because of who they love. Had you considered that CNN isn't covering because they have limited resources and decided it wasn't worth a story given more pressing issues, and that Fox News is covering it because it's a right-wing propaganda outlet manufacturing outrage? (See also: "war on Christmas")

Lets be honest, two things would have happened if it was a Trump supporter taking away a prize of a Clinton supporter. CNN would have covered it, and it would have been posted here. We both know this to be true, if you're being honest.

Nice diversion try.

Where is the diversion? Did I not say that Davis was wrong? Yes, I did. At least read the post, before replying. I know all you want to do is argue, you have proven this. Keep it up and I'll stop responding. Even when you don't have a stance. I simply linked more hypocrisy to someone who said religious hypocrisy. Then backed up my statement that it is all just hypocrisy.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,935
55,287
136
Lets be honest, two things would have happened if it was a Trump supporter taking away a prize of a Clinton supporter. CNN would have covered it, and it would have been posted here. We both know this to be true, if you're being honest.

You have a really strangely high level of confidence in the editorial decisions of a company you presumably do not work for and know no one who works for it. Are you trying to say that CNN is liberally biased? If so, I haven't seen any data to support that.

People often think that if a network runs a lot of negative stories about Trump they must be biased against him. I think the vastly more likely answer is that there are a lot of negative newsworthy events he's engaged in.
 

Commodus

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2004
9,215
6,820
136
Lets be honest, two things would have happened if it was a Trump supporter taking away a prize of a Clinton supporter. CNN would have covered it, and it would have been posted here. We both know this to be true, if you're being honest.

Would they? Maybe, but it's pure speculation. And it doesn't change the ground truth: this isn't a case of CNN trying to suppress news, it's Fox trying to make a bigger deal out of a story than it actually warrants. Get scared, conservatives! Those eeeeevil liberals are trying to keep you down! Now, won't you clap while Trump and the GOP systematically dismantle what's left of American democracy?
 

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
davis-timeline.jpg


Nothing beats religious hypocrisy does it?

Honestly, this meme image is representative of what's wrong with the Internet in regard to discussion/debate. The image lists a bunch of items in chronological order, but completely ignores that she didn't become religious until after all of it.

Davis' first three marriages ended in divorce in 1994, 2006, and 2008; she then remarried her second husband in 2009. She became an Apostolic Christian in 2011.
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Davis

I don't agree with her at all, but I also don't agree with spreading BS. :mad:
 

SMOGZINN

Lifer
Jun 17, 2005
14,359
4,640
136
Honestly, this meme image is representative of what's wrong with the Internet in regard to discussion/debate. The image lists a bunch of items in chronological order, but completely ignores that she didn't become religious until after all of it.


source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Davis

I don't agree with her at all, but I also don't agree with spreading BS. :mad:

So, it is okay for her to hold other people to her religious beliefs that she didn't want others holding her to before she became religious?
 
  • Like
Reactions: soundforbjt

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,749
20,323
146
Honestly, this meme image is representative of what's wrong with the Internet in regard to discussion/debate. The image lists a bunch of items in chronological order, but completely ignores that she didn't become religious until after all of it.


source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Davis

I don't agree with her at all, but I also don't agree with spreading BS. :mad:
Please, she's from an area where you don't need to be a practicing believer to be influenced by religion.

Her conversion to apostolic pentacostal in 2011 doesn't exempt her.

It may very well be that way, but the order of events doesn't preclude a religious influence prior to 2011.

I think that's three ways of saying the same thing, like versions of the bible.

Interpret it how you want
 

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
So, it is okay for her to hold other people to her religious beliefs that she didn't want others holding her to before she became religious?

Isn't this just a strawman argument? I specifically stated that I don't agree with what she did; however, I also don't like cheap meme images that warp reality to serve their own agenda... regardless of whether I agree with that side or not.

Please, she's from an area where you don't need to be a practicing believer to be influenced by religion.

Her conversion to apostolic pentacostal in 2011 doesn't exempt her.

It may very well be that way, but the order of events doesn't preclude a religious influence prior to 2011.

Maybe? But then we're just making up talking points based upon assumptions. It's really better to just avoid that sort of stuff.
 

Sea Ray

Golden Member
May 30, 2013
1,459
31
91
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
Kim Davis -- one of three Kentucky county clerks refusing to issue marriage licenses in violation of multiple court orders, and the only one sentenced to jail time Thursday -- is a Democrat.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...trump-is-a-republican/?utm_term=.4b063ea36646

Fucking Democrats.

And then she joined *your* party. Aren't you lucky.

"Kim Davis, the Kentucky county clerk who was jailed after refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, has officially changed her party registration to the Republican Party.

A spokeswoman for the Liberty Council, a Christian legal organization representing Davis, confirmed the switch.

"My husband and I had talked about it for quite a while and we came to the conclusion that the Democratic Party left us a long time ago, so why were we hanging on?" Davis told Reuters in Washington, where she was attending the Values Voter Summit hosted by the Family Research Council."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...registered-republican/?utm_term=.d42fd3b0ce80
 
  • Like
Reactions: ch33zw1z