Zin - you are wrong - there are plenty of attacks by these dogs whose owners did everything properly.
Where do you think you are going to find 'pro-pit bull' articles? By people with an agenda looking to protect the breed, who are going to spread the myths - it's not the dog - it's the owners, they aren't more dangerous than other breeds, their bite isn't any stronger than other breeds, etc, etc.
Look - Humans own dogs - many humans do a shitty job of owning dogs - with most breeds, that doesn't put people in danger - with this breed - it does, period.
We aren't magically going to make everyone a good dog owner - we also aren't going to stop people from owning dogs. The only real solution is to limit the breed in this case.
Many countries have already banned the breed, required licensing and insurance for the breed, etc - why do we think otherwise?
The statistics tell the whole story - but of course we'll attack the messenger of those statistics rather than the numbers themselves. The CDC offers it's take - and again we're told the numbers are wrong, the media is biased, etc, etc.
In the end - I simply don't understand defending this breed.
I might have a pet tiger - and it might be the sweetest, most affectionate puppy/pet anyone has ever seen - but at the end of the day, it's still a tiger, and the risk far outweighs the benefit - and that's simply not the case for most dog breeds.
Where do you think you are going to find 'pro-pit bull' articles? By people with an agenda looking to protect the breed, who are going to spread the myths - it's not the dog - it's the owners, they aren't more dangerous than other breeds, their bite isn't any stronger than other breeds, etc, etc.
Look - Humans own dogs - many humans do a shitty job of owning dogs - with most breeds, that doesn't put people in danger - with this breed - it does, period.
We aren't magically going to make everyone a good dog owner - we also aren't going to stop people from owning dogs. The only real solution is to limit the breed in this case.
Many countries have already banned the breed, required licensing and insurance for the breed, etc - why do we think otherwise?
The statistics tell the whole story - but of course we'll attack the messenger of those statistics rather than the numbers themselves. The CDC offers it's take - and again we're told the numbers are wrong, the media is biased, etc, etc.
In the end - I simply don't understand defending this breed.
I might have a pet tiger - and it might be the sweetest, most affectionate puppy/pet anyone has ever seen - but at the end of the day, it's still a tiger, and the risk far outweighs the benefit - and that's simply not the case for most dog breeds.