.. Will, surely Nvidia is no "saint" with some of the stuff they have pulled in the past with benchmarking.. however I think ATI now takes the cake in lack of ethics.. or at least in planning..
I have had the x800xt on "backorder" for 2 1/2 months through gateway computer.. in that time the ONLY places selling the x800xt would either be sold out or on a secondary "black" market for 800$..
Today, 2 1/2 months later after having placed an order for an x800xt (with a credit card) I get an email from Gateway saying they have canceled my order and cannot and will not be fulfilling any orders for the x800xt. but that I can purchase an x800pro..
the X800xt never DID exist in the market other then a very small handful of reference boards and a few boards early on..
Basically the x800 does not exist, never did exist and never will exist in any real consumer forum.. meanwhile they took "preorders" with credit cards and many sites published x800xt benchmark results when doing comparisons.. as this card never did and never WILL exist, this is all unethical and simply not fair. Ati has taken the term vaporware to new heights and made suckers out of us all. Certainly we can put to bed who has the fastest card on market NVIDIA 6800ultra or x800xt.. THE 6800 wins by a now show! Sites should stop comparing it to acard that doesn?t exist! who or what to blame is besides the point. the fact it was allowed to go on is..
It is about time both the consumers that held off a purchase and technical websites that wasted their time to publish x800xt benchmarks be given a public apology from ATI to save face.. As it is.. I will certainly never "preorder" anything ATI promises to bring to market..
Now, in the meantime I have purchased an 6800gt.. but it was 3 months waited time I could have been enjoying it having waited for the x800xt vaporware which doesn?t exist. the fact gateway now is offering a "reduced price" on the x800pro.. leads me to further question these ethics..
Of course the moral is to never count on pre-orders.. and here is a perfect expample of why..
I have had the x800xt on "backorder" for 2 1/2 months through gateway computer.. in that time the ONLY places selling the x800xt would either be sold out or on a secondary "black" market for 800$..
Today, 2 1/2 months later after having placed an order for an x800xt (with a credit card) I get an email from Gateway saying they have canceled my order and cannot and will not be fulfilling any orders for the x800xt. but that I can purchase an x800pro..
the X800xt never DID exist in the market other then a very small handful of reference boards and a few boards early on..
Basically the x800 does not exist, never did exist and never will exist in any real consumer forum.. meanwhile they took "preorders" with credit cards and many sites published x800xt benchmark results when doing comparisons.. as this card never did and never WILL exist, this is all unethical and simply not fair. Ati has taken the term vaporware to new heights and made suckers out of us all. Certainly we can put to bed who has the fastest card on market NVIDIA 6800ultra or x800xt.. THE 6800 wins by a now show! Sites should stop comparing it to acard that doesn?t exist! who or what to blame is besides the point. the fact it was allowed to go on is..
It is about time both the consumers that held off a purchase and technical websites that wasted their time to publish x800xt benchmarks be given a public apology from ATI to save face.. As it is.. I will certainly never "preorder" anything ATI promises to bring to market..
Now, in the meantime I have purchased an 6800gt.. but it was 3 months waited time I could have been enjoying it having waited for the x800xt vaporware which doesn?t exist. the fact gateway now is offering a "reduced price" on the x800pro.. leads me to further question these ethics..
Of course the moral is to never count on pre-orders.. and here is a perfect expample of why..